DISFLUENCY IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejfl.v5i2.3344Từ khóa:
desirable difficulties, scaffolding, English language teaching, disfluency, teacher educationTóm tắt
Desirable difficulties, coined by Bjork (1994), includes concepts such as spacing learning, interleaving, and disfluency, all of which can be practiced in the English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classroom. Sans Forgetica, a disfluent font developed at RMIT University in Australia, was specifically designed to enhance learning. Seventy-two preservice elementary school teachers in Switzerland participated in this study aimed at increasing awareness of desirable difficulties in general, and more specifically in the role of disfluency in reading comprehension. No significant differences between participants receiving a text on scaffolding and desirable difficulties in EFL classrooms in Sans Forgetica or Arial were found yet this study contributes to a larger discussion of alternative practices in English language classrooms around the world.
Article visualizations:
Tài liệu tham khảo
Barley, N. (2016). Using Visually Disfluent Fonts for Cueing and Increased Reading.
Benjamin, A. S. (Ed.). (2011). Successful remembering and successful forgetting: A festschrift in honor of Robert A. Bjork. Psychology Press.
Bertsch, S., Pesta, B. J., Wiscott, R., & McDaniel, M. A. (2007). The generation effect: A meta-analytic review. Memory & cognition, 35(2), 201-210.
Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2011). Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning. Psychology and the real world: Essays illustrating fundamental contributions to society, 2(59-68).
Bjork, R. A., & Kroll, J. F. (2015). Desirable difficulties in vocabulary learning. The American journal of psychology, 128(2), 241.
Bjork, R. A., and Yue, C. L. (2016). Commentary: is disfluency desirable? Meta. Learn. 11,133–137. doi: 10.1007/s11409-016-9156-8
Bjork, R.A. (1994). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In J. Metcalfe & A. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 185-205). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cacali, E. (2016). The Effects of Font on Vocabulary Memorization. Kwansei Gakuin University Humanities Review, 21, 111-115.
Diemand-Yauman, C., Oppenheimer, D. M., & Vaughan, E. B. (2011). Fortune favors the (): Effects of disfluency on educational outcomes. Cognition, 118(1), 111-115.
Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4-58.
Eskenazi, M. A., & Nix, B. (2020). Individual differences in the desirable difficulty effect during lexical acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000809
Gardiner, J. M., Smith, H. E., Richardson, C. J., Burrows, M. V., & Williams, S. D. (1985). The generation effect: Continuity between generating and reading. The American journal of psychology, 373-378.
Geller, J., Davis, S. D., & Peterson, D. (2020). Sans forgetica is not desirable for learning.
Hamidi, E., & Bagherzadeh, R. (2018). The logical problem of scaffolding in second language acquisition. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 3(1), 19.
Harris, A. (2018). Sans Forgetica: new typeface designed to help students study. Retrieved from https://www.rmit.edu.au/news/all-news/2018/oct/sans-forgetica-news-story
Jacoby, L. L., Craik, F. I., & Begg, I. (1979). Effects of decision difficulty on recognition and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18(5), 585-600.
Jaffe, A., & Bye, J. (2011). Desirable difficulties in the classroom: When learning how matters as much as what. Psychology Today. Retrieved from https://psychologytoday.com/blog/all-about-addiction/201105/desirable-difficulties-in-the-classroom.
Korn, C. W., Ries, J., Schalk, L., Oganian, Y., & Saalbach, H. (2018). A hard-to-read font reduces the framing effect in a large sample. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 25(2), 696-703.
Kühl, T., & Eitel, A. (2016). Effects of disfluency on cognitive and metacognitive processes and outcomes. Metacognition and Learning, 11(1), 1-13.
Miles, S. (2010). Good Timing: The Spacing Effect and Grammar Acquisition. English Teaching, 65(2).
Nikmah, N. (2018). The Effects of Font Sizes on Students’ Reading Comprehension (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Negeri Makassar).
Rello, L., Pielot, M., & Marcos, M. C. (2016, May). Make it big! The effect of font size and line spacing on online readability. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3637-3648).
RMIT University. (2018). Sans Forgetica. Available at https://sansforgetica.rmit/.
Roediger III, H. L., & Pyc, M. A. (2012). Inexpensive techniques to improve education: Applying cognitive psychology to enhance educational practice. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1(4), 242-248.
Taylor, A., Sanson, M., Burnell, R., Wade, K. A., & Garry, M. (2020). Disfluent difficulties are not desirable difficulties: the (lack of) effect of Sans Forgetica on memory. Memory, 1-8.
Weissgerber, S. C., & Reinhard, M. A. (2017). Is disfluency desirable for learning?. Learning and instruction, 49, 199-217.
Wenzel, K., & Reinhard, M. A. (2019). Relatively unintelligent individuals do not benefit from intentionally hindered learning: The role of desirable difficulties. Intelligence, 77, 101405.
Xie, H., Zhou, Z., & Liu, Q. (2018). Null effects of perceptual disfluency on learning outcomes in a text-based educational context: A meta-analysis.
Yue, C. L., Castel, A. D., & Bjork, R. A. (2013). When disfluency is—and is not—a desirable difficulty: The influence of typeface clarity on metacognitive judgments and memory. Memory & cognition, 41(2), 229-241.
Lượt tải xuống
Đã Xuất bản
Số
Chuyên mục
Giấy phép
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


