VIDEO AS AN INNOVATIVE METHOD TO WORK ON TOURISM STUDENTS RESEARCH SKILLS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejoe.v6i2.3907Keywords:
video as a teaching resource, research in tourism, added value, content quality, tourism educationAbstract
Given the growing need for an increasingly practical teaching pedagogy, there is a need to innovate in content that helps us achieve the objectives of the different training programs. These innovations should not only respond to the application of new methodologies, but it is also necessary for the content to add value to the students. It is necessary that teachers advance at the same pace as society and understand that the expiration of content is increasingly rapid. I personally like to use videos in classes. But to do so, it has to fulfill a series of characteristics. Fundamentally, that its projection generates added value. That is, any proposal is meaningless if the recipient does not consider it useful. In this case, we will focus on how video can be a really interesting tool to grow research skills in tourism students. For this reason, it is key to understanding the students' perception of the usefulness of the videos used in class is key to identifying those resources that provide the most value and those that do not. In order to identify which ones are working better to accomplish our objective. Between 2018 and 2020, a multi-method investigation is carried out that includes survey techniques, discussion groups and interviews with students from different graduate programs in Ostetela Tourism Management School. Many authors, such as Castaño and Romero (2007) mention that the means to be used should not be perceived simply as technical elements, on the contrary they are didactic and communication elements. Along these lines, these and other authors consider that for a video to be didactic it must be produced (by the teacher) according to a series of criteria. Due to the characteristics of our students, external resources (mainly short videos speeches from key speakers) are used, and we understand that they are didactic not only if they help to understand the subject, but they can also help us to understand and simulate eventual professional situations. The provisional results show that the video is a much appreciated teaching resource. However, there is a great disparity in the perception of the students. Highlighting the video interview and the short video as resources that generate more added value. Visual content is increasingly present in classrooms. However, it is not always perceived as useful by students. The teacher must understand that not all resources generate positive impact on the student. Identifying which resources are appreciated as generators of added value is key to improving teaching quality.References
Cabero, J. (2002). Propuestas para la utilización del vídeo en los centros. (Documento línea). Disponible: http://tecnologiaedu.us.es/cuestionario/bibliovir/119.
Cabero, J. (2002). Propuestas para la utilización del vídeo en los centros educativos. Documento en línea. Disponible: http://tecnologiaedu.us.es/revistaslibros/Ballesta.html.
Cochran-Smith, M. (2003). Teaching quality matters. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(2), 95-98.
Croninger, R. G., Valli, L., & Chambliss, M. J. (2012). Researching quality in teaching: Enduring and emerging challenges. Teachers College Record, 114(4), 1-15.
De la Fuente Sánchez, D., Hernández Solís, M. and Pra Martos, I., (2017). Vídeo educativo y rendimiento académico en la enseñanza superior a distancia. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 21(1), p.323.
Dinham, S. (2013). The quality teaching movement in Australia encounters difficult terrain: A personal perspective. Australian Journal of Education, 57(2), 91-106.
Fenstermacher, G., & Richardson, V. (2005). On making determinations of quality in teaching. The Teachers College Record, 107(1), 186-213
Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 569-582.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
Guskey, T. R., & Passaro, P. D. (1994). Teacher efficacy: A study of construct dimensions. American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 627-643
Méndez-Romero, R. (2015). El concepto de excelencia docente: Una aproximación multidimensional inductivo-deductiva desde la teoría fundamentada, el mapeo de la ciencia y el análisis cualitativo de contenido. 10.13140/RG.2.1.1679.5928.
OCDE, Manual de Oslo (2005). Guía para la recolección e interpretación de datos sobre innovación. Madrid.
Santoro, N., Reid, J., Mayer, D., & Singh, M. (2012). Producing ‘quality’ teachers: The role of teacher professional standards. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 40(1), 1-3.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


