METACOGNITION AS A CATALYST FOR IMPROVED LEARNING OUTCOMES IN OPEN & DISTANCE EDUCATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejoe.v9i1.5567کلمات کلیدی:
Open & Distance Education, metacognition, self-regulated learningچکیده
Challenges in open and distance education are unique to the learner and generally result in a gap between what is desired and what is realized. This paper explores how metacognition works wonders in bridging this gap and leading to improved learning outcomes within Open and Distance Education (ODE) environments. Metacognitive strategies foster self-regulated learning and assist students in properly planning, monitoring, and assessing their learning processes. In line with this, this paper discusses how metacognition could make a difference in improving academic achievement, promoting independent learning, and building lifelong learning skills within ODE. We demonstrate, from in-depth research and analysis of best practices, how the integration of metacognitive approaches into practice could go a long way in closing the achievement gap and optimizing the educational experience for distance learners. The findings underscore the critical role of metacognition in letting students rise above intrinsic ODE difficulties toward superior learning outcomes.
مراجع
Ayaz, N., Ghaffar, A., Idrees, M. & Ayaz, S. (2023). Improving classroom learning environment for enhancing reading comprehension through metacognitive strategies. Russian Law Journal, 11(5):498-507. https://doi.org/10.52783/rlj.v11i5.2652
Back, D. A., Behringer, F., Haberstroh, N., Ehlers, J. P., Sostmann, K., & Peters, H. (2016). Learning management system and e-learning tools: an experience of medical students' usage and expectations. International journal of medical education, 7, 267. DOI: 10.5116/ijme.57a5.f0f5
Baker, L. & Brown, A. (1984). Meta-cognitive skills and reading. In: Pearson, P.D., Barr, R., Kamil, M.L. & Mosenthal, P. (Ed). Handbook of Reading Research. New York: Longman; pp. 353-394.
Bonk, C. (2016). Keynote: What is the state of e-learning? Reflections on 30
ways learning is changing. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 20(2),
–20]. http://jofdl.nz/index.php/JOFDL/article/viewFile/300/205
Bueno, P. M., & Rodas, R. S. (2021). Distance learning and metacognitive awareness: a positive relationship? In ICERI 2021 Proceedings (pp. 7775-7780). IATED. doi: 10.21125/iceri.2021.1746
Bull, S., & Kay, J. (2013). Open learner models as drivers for metacognitive processes. International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies, 349-365. DOI:10.1007/978-1-4419-5546-3_23
Butler, D. L. (2015). Metacognition and self-regulation in learning. The SAGE Handbook of Learning. Los Angeles: SAGE, 291-309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-373951-3.00026-0
Cera, R., Mancini, M., & Antonietti, A. (2013). Relationships between metacognition, self-efficacy and self-regulation in learning. Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies (ECPS Journal), 4(7), 115-141. http://dx.doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2013-007-cera
Chow, W. S., & Shi, S. (2014). Investigating students’ satisfaction and continuance intention toward e-learning: An extension of the expectation–confirmation model. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 1145-1149. DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.193
Cotterall, S. & Murray, G. (2009). Enhancing meta-cognitive knowledge: Structure, affordances and self. System, 37:34-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.08.003
Creegan-Quinquis, M., & Thormann, J. (2017). Effective use of technologies to transform arts education and teach diverse learners. In Art and Technology (pp. 45-58). Brill. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-863-1_3
Cross, D.R & Paris, S.G. (1998). Development and instructional analyses of children’s meta-cognition and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology. 80, 131-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.2.131
Deng, H., Duan, S. X., & Wibowo, S. (2023). Digital technology driven knowledge sharing for job performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(2), 404-425. DOI:10.1108/JKM-08-2021-0637
Flavell, JH. (1979). Meta-cognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist 34 (10):906-911. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
Guspatni, M. (2018). Students’ activities in, perceptions of and expectations for e-learning: A case in Indonesia. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 10(1), 97. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2018.10.006
Hattie, JAC. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of over 800 Meta-analyses relating to Achievement. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887332
Hunter, J. E. (2017). A causal analysis of cognitive ability, job knowledge, job performance, and supervisor ratings. In Performance measurement and theory (pp. 257-266). Routledge. DOI:10.4324/9781315211947-13
Kelly, D., & Donaldson, D. (2016). Investigating the complexities of academic success: Personality constrains the effects of metacognition. Psychology of Education Review, 40(2), 17-24. http://hdl.handle.net/1893/24578
Kim, Y. H., Choe, E. K., Lee, B., & Seo, J. (2019, May). Understanding personal productivity: How knowledge workers define, evaluate, and reflect on their productivity. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-12). DOI:10.1145/3290605.3300845
Kuhn, D. (2000). Meta-cognitive development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(5):178-181. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00088
Kuhn, D. & Dean., D. (2004). A bridge between cognitive psychology and educational practice. Theory into Practice, 43(4):268-273. DOI:10.1207/s15430421tip4304_4
Livingston, J. A. (2003). Metacognition: An overview. New York: State University of New York.
Martinez., M.E. (2006). What is meta-cognition? Phi Delta Kappan, 87(9):696-699. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170608700916
McCracken, H. (2008). Best practices in supporting persistence of distance education students through integrated web-based systems. Journal College Student Retention, 10(1), 65–91. https://doi.org/10.2190/CS.10.1.f
Menchaca, M. P., & Bekele, T. A. (2008). Student and instructor identified success factors in distance education. Distance Education, 29(3), 231–252. Retrieved August 16, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/103121/.
Minnaar, A. (2012). Metacognition in distance learning. Trends and Issues in Distance Education: International Perspectives, 239-253.
Narens, L., Graf, A., & Nelson, T. (1996). Metacognitive aspects of implicit/ explicit memory. In L. M. Reder (Ed.). Implicit memory and metacognition. New York, NY: Erlbaum.
Ohtani, K., & Hisasaka, T. (2018). Beyond intelligence: A meta-analytic review of the relationship among metacognition, intelligence, and academic performance. Metacognition and Learning, 13, 179-212. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/s11409-018-9183-8
Özçakmak, H., Köroglu, M., Korkmaz, C., & Bolat, Y. (2021). The Effect of Metacognitive Awareness on Academic Success. African educational research Journal, 9(2), 434-448. DOI:10.30918/AERJ.92.21.020
Rawson, K. A. & Dunlosky, J. (2007). Improving students’ self-evaluation of learning for key concepts in textbook materials. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19(4–5),559–579. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/09541440701326022
Saputri, V. N., & Kesumawardani, A. D. (2021). Problem-based learning (PBL) model: How does it influence metacognitive skills and independent learning? Journal of Advanced Sciences and Mathematics Education, 1(1), 27-32. DOI:10.58524/jasme.v1i1.18
Schneider, W. (2008). The development of meta-cognitive knowledge in children and adolescents: Major trends and implications for education. Mind, Brain and Education 2(3):114-121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2008.00041.x
Schraw, G. & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review 7(4):351-371. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/BF02212307
Schraw, G. (1995). Promoting general meta-cognitive awareness. Instructional Science 26(1):113-126. DOI:10.1023/A:1003044231033
Schunk, D. H. (2008). Meta-cognition, self-regulation and self-regulated learning: Research recommendations. Educational Psychology Review 20, 463–467. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/s10648-008-9086-3
Spinath, B. (2012). Academic achievement. In: Ramachandran V.S. (Ed). Encyclopedia of Human Behavior. 2nd ed. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-375000-6.00001-X
Tu, C. -H., & Yen, C. J. (2007). A study of multi-dimensional online social presence. In L. W. Cooke (Ed.). Frontiers in higher education. New York, NY: Nova Science. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.520
Wallace, R. M. (2003). Online learning in higher education: A review of research on interactions among teachers and students. Education, Communication & Information, 3(2), 240–280. DOI:10.1080/14636310303143
Ward, R. T., & Butler, D. L. (2019). An investigation of metacognitive awareness and academic performance in college freshmen. Education, 139(3), 120-126. https://doi.org/10.22437/irje.v6i1.24627
Waters, H. S., & Schneider, W. (2010). Metacognition, strategy use, and instruction. New York, NY: Guilford.
Woolfolk, A. (2007). Educational Psychology. 10th ed. Boston, USA: Pearson.
Whiteside, A. L., Dikkers, A. G., & Swan, K. (Eds.). (2023). Social presence in online learning: Multiple perspectives on practice and research. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003447023
دانلودها
چاپ شده
شماره
نوع مقاله
مجوز
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


