SPECIFICATIONS OF E-MENTORING IN EDUCATION FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: ACTION RESEARCH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejoe.v10i3.6273کلمات کلیدی:
e-mentoring, Education for Sustainable Development (ESD), professional development, sustainability educationچکیده
Technological advancements have enabled mentoring relationships to transcend temporal and geographical boundaries through digital platforms. E-mentoring—defined as mentoring facilitated by technology rather than face-to-face interaction—offers asynchronous, flexible, and accessible support, distinguishing it from traditional mentoring formats. This study investigates the characteristics of e-mentoring within the context of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD), employing a meta-analysis of scholarly literature published over the past seven years. Through systematic searches across academic databases (ERIC, Google Scholar, Springer Link, and Taylor & Francis), 18 evidence-based studies on e-mentoring were identified, including 5 directly related to ESD and 3 concerning distance education and sustainability. The methodology followed a structured process of search, screening, and synthesis, aiming to explore how e-mentoring aligns with the principles of sustainability. The findings contribute to a consolidated understanding of e-mentoring as a tool for professional development in ESD, while also revealing existing knowledge gaps and suggesting directions for future research.مراجع
Ben-Amram M, Davidovitch N, 2024. Novice teachers and mentor teachers: From a traditional model to a holistic mentoring model in the postmodern era. Education Sciences 14(2): 143. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14020143
Bierema LL, Merriam SB, 2002. E-mentoring: Using computer-mediated communication to enhance the mentoring process. Innovative Higher Education 26(3): 211-227. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1017921023103
Bonnett C, Wildemuth BM, Sonnenwald DH, 2006. Interactivity between protégés and scientists in an electronic mentoring program. Instructional Science 34: 21–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-005-4115-9
Dawson P, 2014. Beyond a definition: Toward a framework for designing and specifying mentoring models. Educational Researcher 43(3): 137-145. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.3102/0013189x14528751
Ensher EA, Heun C, Blanchar A, 2003. Online mentoring and computer–mediated communication: New direction in research. Journal of Vocational Behavior. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222831308_Online_Mentoring_and_Computer-Mediated_Communication_New_Directions_in_Research
Jung S, Draper J, Malek K, Padron TC, Olson ED, 2024. Bridging theory and practice: An examination of how event-tourism research aligns with UN Sustainable Development Goals. Journal of Travel Research 63(7): 1583–1605. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00472875241231273
Kemmis S, McTaggart R, Nixon R, 2014. The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. Singapore: Springer. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2
Khan M, 2025. Mentimeter tool for enhancing student engagement and active learning: A literature review. International Journal of Changes in Education. http://dx.doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE52023801
Kochan F, Pascarelli JT, 2012. Perspectives on culture and mentoring in the global age. In: The SAGE Handbook of Mentoring and Coaching in Education. Sage, Los Angeles, CA: 184-198. https://www.torrossa.com/en/resources/an/4913114#page=209
Loepp E, Weber N, 2021. Digital collaboration tools. In: Designing Courses with Digital Technologies. doi:10.4324/9781003144175-8. Retrieved from https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003144175-8/digital-collaboration-tools-eric-loepp-nicole-weber
Louws ML, Meirink JA, van Veen K, van Driel JH, 2017. Teachers' self-directed learning and teaching experience: What, how, and why teachers want to learn. Teaching and Teacher Education 66: 171-183. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0742051X17305930
Maxwell B, Káplár-Kodácsy K, Hobson AJ, Hotham EH, 2024. Effective mentor training, education and development: A qualitative multilevel meta-synthesis. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education 13(4): 422–440. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-07-2023-0068
Opara V, Spangsdorf S, Ryan M, 2021. Reflecting on the use of Google Docs for online interviews: Innovation in qualitative data collection. Qualitative Research 23: 561-578. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941211045192
Pesina R, 2025. Mentoring software in education and its impact on teacher development: An integrative literature review. International Journal on Integrating Technology in Education 14(1): 29–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.12515
Rath A, 2025. Padlet: a tool for fostering collaborative learning and feedback literacy in dental education. Frontiers in Medicine 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1357068
Regan K, Weiss MP, O’Brien KM, 2025. Ecoaching as an alternative to traditional supervision: Practices and perspectives from university supervisors. Teacher Education and Special Education 48(2): 122–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/08884064241311630
Salmon G, 2000. Computer mediated conferencing for management learning at the Open University. Management Learning 31(4): 491-502. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1350507600314005
Single PB, Muller CB, 1999. Electronic mentoring: Issues to advance research and practice. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED439683
Syahputra R, Usman O, 2025. University students' intentions to use Slack: An integrated approach of TAM and SDT. International Student Conference on Business, Education, Economics, Accounting, and Management (ISC-BEAM). https://doi.org/10.21009/ISC-BEAM.013.159
Trust T, Krutka DG, Carpenter JP, 2016. “Together we are better”: Professional learning networks for teachers. Computers & Education 102: 15-34. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036013151630135X
UNESCO, 2017. Unpacking sustainable development goal 4: Education 2030 guide. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000246300 . Accessed 25 August 2025
Wenger E, 1998. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1023947624004
دانلودها
چاپ شده
شماره
نوع مقاله
مجوز
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


