REFRAMING MULTIMODALITY IN CONTEMPORARY EDUCATION: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF RESEARCH PATTERNS AND PEDAGOGICAL SHIFTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejoe.v10i3.6106Palabras clave:
multimodal education, learner agency, semiotic theory, pedagogical innovationResumo
This paper explores the evolving role of multimodality in education, highlighting its shift from a focus on digital learning environments to a broader pedagogical paradigm. Multimodality, rooted in social semiotic theory, recognises meaning as constructed through diverse modes—text, image, sound, gesture—making it essential for modern teaching and learning. Technological advancements and cultural pluralism have reinforced the need for multimodal pedagogies that support learner agency, inclusivity, and critical literacy. The study draws from the multiliteracies framework to argue that traditional language-centred education must expand to accommodate complex, multimodal communication practices. It positions the learner not as a passive recipient but as an active designer of meaning, capable of selecting and combining semiotic resources to communicate and learn. Multimodal learning is particularly relevant in multilingual and multicultural settings, where expressive diversity enhances identity formation and cross-cultural understanding. Recent literature advocates for integrating multimodality into teacher education and classroom practice, particularly through project-based and collaborative digital activities. In these contexts, learners develop critical literacies by navigating and producing multimodal texts across platforms and modes. The paper also calls for the integration of adjacent concepts such as multiplicity, hybridity, and cognitive complexity into multimodality research. These dimensions can enrich understanding of how learners from diverse backgrounds construct knowledge using a mix of cultural and semiotic resources. Methodologically, the study supports mixed-methods and participatory approaches to capture the depth of multimodal interaction. Ultimately, the authors propose a reimagining of multimodality as a foundational principle in 21st-century education—one that supports equitable, creative, and reflexive learning ecosystems across disciplines and educational settings.Citas
Adami, E. (2016). Introducing multimodality. In O. García, N. Flores, & M. Spotti (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language and society (pp. 451–472). Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/27951
Aksnes, D. W., Langfeldt, L., & Wouters, P. (2019). Citations, citation indicators, and research quality: An overview of basic concepts and theories. SAGE Open, 9(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019829575
Argyriou, M., & Tapsis, N. (2023). Flexible learning environments and practices: Their contribution to teacher training (In Greek). DiSIGMA Editions.
Bernsen, N. O. (2008). Multimodality theory. In N. O. Bernsen & L. Dybkjær (Eds.), Multimodal user interfaces: From signals to interaction (pp. 5–29). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76386-8_2
Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2016). Multimodality, learning and communication: A social semiotic frame. Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.routledge.com/Multimodality-Learning-and-Communication-A-social-semiotic-frame/Bezemer-Kress/p/book/9780415709620?srsltid=AfmBOoqz1HpynusW4J0P123m91F5JfcsXjRAZWPesq9UJVhb2-QmT79P
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2015). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Learning by design. Palgrave Macmillan UK. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/book/10.1057/9781137539724
Di Cesare, D., & Rowsell, J. (2020). Teaching beyond a print mindset: Applying multimodal pedagogies within literacy teacher education. In R. E. Ferdig, & K. Kennedy (Eds.), Teaching literacy in the twenty-first century classroom. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved from https://www.scribd.com/document/843038146/Teaching-Literacy-in-the-Twenty-First-Century-Classroom-Teacher-Knowledge-Self-Efficacy-and-Minding-the-Gap-1st-ed-Edition-Tiffany-L-Gallagher
Gee, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (2nd ed.). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203814444
Grannås, J., & Stavem, S. M. (2021). Transitions through remodelling teaching and learning environments. Education Inquiry, 12(3), 266–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2021.1900794
Jewitt, C. (2008). Multimodality and literacy in school classrooms. Review of research in education, 32(1), 241-267. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07310586
Jewitt, C., Bezemer, J., & O’Halloran, K. (2016). Introducing multimodality. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315638027
Jonassen, D., & Land, S. (Eds.). (2000). Theoretical foundations of learning environments. Lawrence Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203813799
Kansal, R., Kaur, P., & Bhandari, H. (2024). Transforming learning spaces in the digitalisation era: A bibliometric exploration of emerging trends. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 20(2), 67–78. Retrieved from https://www.je-lks.org/ojs/index.php/Je-LKS_EN/article/view/1135994
Kress, G. (2009). Assessment in the perspective of a social semiotic theory of multimodal teaching and learning. In C. Wyatt-Smith & J. Cumming (Eds.), Educational assessment in the 21st century (pp. 19–41). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9964-9_2
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. Arnold. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Multimodal_Discourse.html?id=R494tAEACAAJ&redir_esc=y
Lambropoulos, N., & Kampylis, P. (2009). Fostering collaborative creativity and metacognitive awareness in e-learning frameworks: The case of Hybrid Synergy Tag Tool. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference of Greek Association of Primary Education Music Teachers (pp. 71–76). GAPMET. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/18317899/Fostering_collaborative_creativity_and_metacognitive_awareness_in_e_learning_framework_The_case_of_Hybrid_Synergy_Tag_tool
Lim, F. V. (2024). The multimodal turn in higher education. In V. Beltrán-Palanques & E. Bernad-Mechó (Eds.), Current trends in EMI and multimodality in higher education (pp. 9–25). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003205517
Lim, F. V., & Tan, M. T. (2021). Curriculum and assessment mismatch: Examining the role of images in literacy assessments. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 44(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03652078
Lim, F. V., Towndrow, P. A., & Tan, J. M. (2023). Unpacking the teachers’ multimodal pedagogies in the primary English language classroom in Singapore. RELC Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231171980
Melenets, L. I., Shcherbyna, V. M., & Kulbediuk, A. Y. (2024). Multimodal approach to training of teachers of preschool education institutions: Focus on interests and needs. Journal of International Legal Communication, 13(2), 98–107. http://dx.doi.org/10.32612/uw.27201643.2024.13.2.pp.98-107
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2
Newby, T., Lehman, J., Richardson, J., & Ertmer, P. (2009). Impact of asynchronous online discussions: A study of implementation in two large-enrolment blended courses. In Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE) (pp. 2928–2936). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228979717_Impact_of_asynchronous_online_discussions_A_study_of_implementation_in_two_large-enrollment_blended_courses
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). Academic Press. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9780121098902/handbook-of-self-regulation
Saarinen, R., Järvi, J., Raisamo, R., & Salo, J. (2005). Agent-based architecture for implementing multimodal learning environments for visually impaired children. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (ICMI '05) (pp. 54–61). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/1088463.1088476
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.). (2008). Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications. Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.routledge.com/Motivation-and-Self-Regulated-Learning-Theory-Research-and-Applications/Schunk-Zimmerman/p/book/9780805858983?srsltid=AfmBOopZpbzFJHPkbMLOX3CLc2hJyC-fajR42db6SB9oiyvm-9Y_ExHO
Snyder, I. (2001). Literacy, technology and the classroom. In D. Koutsogiannis (Ed.), Informatics and language education: The international experience (pp. 103–123). Centre for the Greek Language. [In Greek]
Spelt, E. J. H., Biemans, H. J. A., Tobi, H., Luning, P. A., & Mulder, M. (2009). Teaching and learning in interdisciplinary higher education: A systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 21(4), 365–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-009-9113-z
Descargas
Publicada
Número
Sección
Licenza
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
