IMPLEMENTATION AND EVALUATION OF REALISTIC MATHEMATICS EDUCATION ACTIVITIES WITH USING ELECTRONIC PORTFOLIO

Autori

  • Eda Nur Sezer Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Elif Bahadir Yıldız Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey

Parole chiave:

realistic mathematics education, e-portfolio, portfolio, real life math questions

Abstract

In the study, the mathematics activities prepared by taking expert opinions within the framework of Realistic Mathematics Education (RME), which contains real life examples, focuses on angles, and requires to do design or research, have been applied to the students. The study was conducted in a secondary school in Istanbul in the academic year of 2017-2018 and proceeded for a total of 8 weeks. The target group of the study consisted of 60 7th grade students. The research is designed as an intervention research which is one of the qualitative research methods. In this study, the activities prepared within the RME framework were conducted for 8 weeks using the electronic portfolio which is one of the alternative assessment and evaluation methods in the experimental group and the activity worksheets in the other group. Students’ answers were evaluated according to the specific criteria formed by taking expert opinion and subjected to qualitative analysis. Although it is seen that e-portfolio has positive effects on students’ ability to do a research, to model and to design creative products, it has been found that it did not contribute to their mathematical literacy and to their expressing their mathematical ideas clearly in the expected level.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

Riferimenti bibliografici

Akçadağ, T. (2010). “Öğretmenlerin ilköğretim programındaki yöntem teknik ölçme ve değerlendirme konularına ilişkin eğitim ihtiyaçları” [Needs of prospective teachers on the methodology, technical measurement and evaluation in the primary school curriculum]. Ahmet Yesevi University Bilig Journal, 53, 29-50.

Altun, A., & Gelbal, S. (2014). “Öğretmenlerinin kullandıkları ölçme ve değerlendirme yöntem veya araçlarının ikili karşılaştırma yöntemiyle belirlenmesi” [Determination of assessment and evaluation methods or tools used by teachers by dual comparison method]. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 5(1).

Arslan, A.S., Avcı, N., & İyibil, Ü. (2008). “Fizik öğretmen adaylarının alternatif ölçme- değerlendirme yöntemlerini algılama düzeyleri” [Physic prospective teachers’ level of perception for alternative assessment methods]. Journal of Dicle University, Ziya Gökalp Education Faculty.

Baki, A., & Birgin, O. (2002). “Matematik eğitiminde alternatif bir değerlendirme olarak bireysel gelişim dosyasi uygulaması” [Individual development file application as an alternative assessment in mathematics education]. V. National Science and Mathematics Education Congress Proceedings Book, II, 913-920.

Başol, G., Çakan, M., Kan, A., Özbek, Ö.Y., Özdmir, D., & Yaşar, M. (2013). “Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme” [Measurement and Evaluation in Education]. Ankara: Pegem Academy Publications.

Barrot, J.S. (2016). Using Facebook-based e-portfolio in ESL writing classrooms: impact and challenges. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 29(3), 286-301.

Bryant, L.H., & Chittum, J.R. (2013). ePortfolio Effectiveness: A (n Ill-Fated) Search for Empirical Support. International Journal of ePortfolio, 3(2), 189-198.

Dağ, E. (2012) Web Ortamları Kullanılarak 5. Sınıf Öğrencileri İçin Matematik Dersi Ödev Değerlendirmesi ve Bu Ortamların Öğrenci Üzerindeki Etkililiğinin Araştırılması. Education Sciences, 7(1), 466-475.

Denton, D.W., & Wicks, D. (2013). Implementing electronic portfolios through social media platforms: Steps and student perceptions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 17(1), 125-135.

Gelbal, S., & Kelecioğlu, H. (2007). “Öğretmenlerin ölçme ve değerlendirme yöntemleri hakkındaki yeterlik algıları ve karşılaştıkları sorunlar” [Competence perceptions of teachers about measurement and evaluation methods and problems they face]. Journal of Hacettepe University Faculty of Education, 33(33).

Gömleksiz, M.N., & Ayhan, K.O.Ç. (2010). Bilgisayar okuryazarlığı becerisi ediniminde e-portfolyo sürecinin öğrenen performansına ve tutumlarına Etkisi. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(2), 75-96.

Khales, B. (2016). Using Electronic Portfolio to Promote Professional Learning Community for Pre-Service Early Childhood Teachers at Alquds University. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(26), 127-136.

Lowenthal, P., White, J.W., & Cooley, K. (2011). Remake/Remodel: Using ePortfolios and a System of Gates to Improve Student Assessment and Program Evaluation. International Journal of ePortfolio, 1(1), 61-70.

Luchoomun, D., McLuckie, J., and Wessel M., (2010). Collaborative e-Learning: e- Portfolios for Assessment, Teaching and Learning. Electronic Journal of e- Learning 1 (8).

Morgil, I., Cıngör, N., Erökten, S., Yavuz, S., & Oskay, Ö.Ö. (2004). Bilgisayar destekli kimya egitiminde portfolyo çalismalari. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 3(2).

Saarinen, A., Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., & Hakkarainen, K.K. (2017). The Functions and Benefits of the ePortfolio in Craft Education at the Primary Level. Design and Technology Education: an International Journal, 21(3).

Sütçü, A.G.N.D., & Bulut, İ. (2015). “Ortaokul Matematik Öğretmenlerinin Alternatif Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Tekniklerini Kullanma Düzeylerine İlişkin Yeterlik Algılarının Değerlendirilmesi” [Assesment of Competency Perceptions of Secondary School Math Teachers about the Level of the Use of AMET]. e- International Journal of Educational Research, 6(3).

Wanchid, R., & Charoensuk, V. (2015). The effects of paper-based portfolios and weblog-based electronic portfolios on limited English proficiency students in writing for service industry course. English Language Teaching, 8(9), 131.

Yıldız, İ., & Uyanık, N. (2004). “Matematik eğitiminde ölçme-değerlendirme üzerine” [About a measurement and evaluation in mathematics education]. Kastamonu Education Journal, 97.

Dowloads

Pubblicato

2018-12-10

Fascicolo

Vol 3, No 2 (2018)

Sezione

Articles

Licenza

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

 

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

 

  1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

 

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).