ENGLISH-MAJORED STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF GRAMMARLY’S FEEDBACK IN PARAGRAPH WRITING

Автори

  • Luong Vo Nhat Quang Nam Can Tho University, Vietnam
  • Lam Ky Nhan Nam Can Tho University, Vietnam

ДОИ:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejoe.v11i2.6890

Клучни зборови:

Grammarly, automated writing evaluation, AI-assisted writing, paragraph writing, English-majored students

Апстракт

The growing use of artificial intelligence (AI)-powered writing assistants has transformed English writing instruction by providing learners with immediate and automated feedback. Among these tools, Grammarly has gained widespread popularity in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) contexts; however, limited research has explored English-majored students’ perceptions of its feedback in paragraph writing. This mixed-methods study investigated students’ perceptions of Grammarly’s usability, correction accuracy, impact on confidence and writing development, perceived strengths, and perceived limitations. Quantitative data were collected through a questionnaire administered to 123 English-majored students at Nam Can Tho University, while qualitative data were obtained from semi-structured interviews with ten students. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were employed to analyze the data. The findings indicated that participants held highly positive perceptions of Grammarly (overall M = 4.24). Students particularly valued its usability, immediate feedback, grammatical accuracy, and support for self-editing and autonomous learning. Interview findings further revealed that Grammarly enhanced learners’ confidence, reduced writing anxiety, and encouraged independent revision. Nevertheless, participants acknowledged that Grammarly was less effective in addressing higher-order writing concerns, including idea development, coherence, and organization, and emphasized that it could not replace teacher feedback. The study concludes that Grammarly is a valuable supplementary tool for EFL paragraph writing and is most effective when integrated with teacher guidance to support both linguistic accuracy and overall writing development.

Биографии на авторите

  • Luong Vo Nhat Quang, Nam Can Tho University, Vietnam

    Luong Vo Nhat Quang is an English lecturer at Nam Can Tho University, Vietnam. His primary research interests encompass learning media, critical thinking, creativity and innovation, as well as teaching and learning methodologies.

  • Lam Ky Nhan, Nam Can Tho University, Vietnam

    Lam Ky Nhan is a lecturer in the Faculty of Foreign Languages at Nam Can Tho University, Vietnam. He teaches undergraduate courses in English grammar, academic writing, and language assessment. His research interests include English language teaching, online language learning, teacher and learner motivation, language testing and assessment, and the integration of emerging technologies into language education. He has participated in and published research on English language education, teacher development, textbook implementation, and AI in language teaching and learning.

Референци

Alharbi, M. (2019). Saudi Arabia EFL university students’ voice on challenges and solution in learning academic writing. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(3), 576–586. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v8i3.15276

Al-Khulaidi, M., & Abdulkhalek, M. (2022). Academic writing problems in L2 settings: Realities and need for intervention. Journal of English Studies in Arabia Felix, 1(1), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.56540/jesaf.v1i1.15

Amelia, R. (2020). Students’ perception on employing self-directed feedback in writing. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature, 5(1), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v5i1.10151

Bhowmik, S. (2021). Writing instruction in an EFL context: Learning to write or writing to learn language? BELTA Journal, 5(1), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.36832/beltaj.2021.0501.03

Dewi, U. (2023). Grammarly as automated writing evaluation: Its effectiveness from EFL students’ perceptions. Lingua Cultura, 16(2), 155–161. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v16i2.8315

Fahmi, M., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2021). EFL students’ perception on the use of Grammarly and teacher feedback. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 6(1), 18–25. https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v6i1.849

Fathi, J., Rahimi, M., & Liu, G. (2022). A preliminary study on flipping an English as a foreign language collaborative writing course with video clips: Its impact on writing skills and writing motivation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 39(2), 659–675. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12772

Gozali, I., Wijaya, A. R. T., Lie, A., Cahyono, B. Y., & Suryati, N. (2024). Leveraging the potential of ChatGPT as an automated writing evaluation (AWE) tool: Students’ feedback literacy development and AWE tools integration framework. The Jalt Call Journal, 20(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v20n1.1200

Hoang, G. T. L., & Van, K. T. G. (2025). Grammarly Feedback on EFL Learners’ Writing: Feedback Precision and Student Perceptions. EIKI Journal of Effective Teaching Methods, 3(2). https://journals.eikipub.com/index.php/jetm/article/view/469

Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667251

Jelita, K., Daud, A., & Masyhur, M. (2023). The effectiveness of using Grammarly on high school students’ writing quality. International Journal of Educational Best Practices, 7(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.31258/ijebp.v7n1.p43-55

Koltovskaia, S. (2020). Student engagement with automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) provided by Grammarly: A multiple case study. Assessing Writing, 44, 100450. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100450

Lee, I. (2017). Classroom writing assessment and feedback in L2 school contexts. Springer. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-981-10-3924-9

Manchón, R. M. (2011). Writing to learn the language. Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language, 61-82. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.31.07man?locatt=mode:legacy

Mehta, S., & Al-Mahrooqi, R. (2014). Can thinking be taught? Linking critical thinking and writing in an EFL context. REL C Journal, 46(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688214555356

Myles, J. (2002). Second language writing and research: The writing process and error analysis in student texts. Tesl-ej, 6(2), 1-20.

O’Neill, R., & Russell, A. M. T. (2019). Stop! Grammar time: University students’ perceptions of the automated feedback program Grammarly. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1), 42–56. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3795

Prasetya, R. E., & Raharjo, D. H. (2023). Enhancing English language writing skills: An evaluation of the efficacy of Grammarly application. Journal of English Language Studies, 8(2), 320-338. https://doi.org/10.30870/jels.v8i2.19294

Ranalli, J., Link, S., & Chukharev-Hudilainen, E. (2017). Automated writing evaluation for formative assessment of second language writing: investigating the accuracy and usefulness of feedback as part of argument-based validation. Educational Psychology, 37(1), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2015.1136407

Reichelt, M. (2011). Foreign language writing: An overview. Foreign language writing instruction: Principles and practices, 3-21. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Foreign_Language_Writing_Instruction.html?id=wKoWEAAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y

Sengul, F., Bostancı, H., & Kurt, M. (2022). Online in-class vs. out-of-class flipped learning models in English as a foreign language writing classes. Frontiers in Psychology, 13,1009800. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1009800

Tambunan, A., Andayani, W., Sari, W., & Lubis, F. (2022). Investigating EFL students’ linguistic problems using Grammarly as automated writing evaluation feedback. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v12i1.46428

Thi, N., & Nikolov, M. (2021). How teacher and Grammarly feedback complement one another in Myanmar EFL students’ writing. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 31(6), 767–779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00625-2

Thongchalerm, S., & Jarunthawatchai, W. (2020). The impact of genre-based instruction on EFL learners’ writing development. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.1311a

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wang, Z., & Han, F. (2022). The effects of teacher feedback and automated feedback on cognitive and psychological aspects of foreign language writing: A mixed-methods research. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.909802

Yang, Y. I. (2015). An investigation of Chinese junior high school teachers’ and students’ attitudes towards EFL writing. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 5(2), 59-75. Retrieved from https://consortiacademia.org/wp-content/uploads/IJRSE/IJRSE_v5i2/1209-4335-1-PB.pdf

Преземања

Објавено

2026-07-23

Издание

Том. 11 Бр. 2 (2026)

Секција

Articles

Дозвола

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

 

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

 

  1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

 

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).