CONSEGUENZE DELL'ATTUAZIONE DI E-LEARNING 2.0 NEL SISTEMA EDUCATIVO MODERNO (CONSEQUENCES OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF E-LEARNING 2.0 IN MODERN EDUCATION SYSTEM)

Autoři

  • Oleksandra Mladenova Ph.D Researcher, Faculty of Preschool and Primary Education, Mаzyr State Pedagogic University, Belarus

Klíčová slova:

Web 2.0, implementazione di E-learning 2.0, istruzione moderna, ambiente educativo /Web 2.0, implementation of E-learning 2.0, modern education, educational environment

Abstrakt

Aver la possibilità di creare pubblicare e facilmente contenuti digitali è la chiave per il Web 2.0. Tuttavia, il contenuto digitale deve avere determinate caratteristiche per essere veramente Web 2.0. Ci sono probabilmente di più, ma le cinque piu importante caracteristiche sono “searchable, editable, linkable, feedable and taggable” or ricercabili, modificabili, collegabile, alimentabile, e oggetto di tag. Il presente articolo esplora il concetto di E-learning 2.0, le implicazioni di attuazione e implementazione di E-learning 2.0 nell'istruzione, in termini di sfide, opportunità, e la prontezza degli studenti per l'educativo.

 

Having the ability to create and easily publish digital content is the key to Web 2.0. However, the digital content must have certain characteristics in order to be truly Web 2.0. There are probably more, but the five most important characteristics are "searchable, editable, linkable, feedable and taggable". This research article explores the concept of E-learning 2.0, the implications of implementation and execution of E-learning 2.0 in education, in terms of challenges, opportunities, and the readiness of students for education.

 

Reference

Perelman, Lewis J. (1992): School's out. A radical new formula for the revitalization of America's educational system. New York: Aron Books

Hauttekeete, L., Méchant, P., Veevaete, P. y De Wever, B. (2007). Multimedia workshops. ISMW '07. Ninth IEEE

International Symposium on 10–12 Dec. 2007, pp. 511 – 516.

10.1109/ISM.Workshops.2007.91. IEEEXplore database). [Accessed: October 10, 2008].

Lincoln, Y. & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Mcloughlin, C. & Lee, M. (2008). Mapping the digital terrain: New media and social software as catalysts for pedagogical change [Online Article]. Proceedings Ascilite Melbourne 2008.

Perelman, Lewis J.(1993): School's Out. The hyperlearning revolution will replace public education

Field, John (2006): Lifelong Learning and the New Educational Order Trentham Books

Granovetter, M. (1973): The strength of weak ties. In: Am J. of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380

Ivan Illich (1971a): A haladás ritualizálása. (A Deschooling Society. Ritualization of Progress. New York, Harper & Row Publishers Inc., pp. 34-51

O'Hear, S. (2006). E–learning 2.0: How Web technologies are shaping education.

Reig, H. (2008). E–learning 2.0, bases, principios y tendencias. Available in: http://www.educaweb.com/noticia/2008/03/21/elearning-2-0-bases-principios-tendencias-211238.html

Siemens, G. (2004). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age online Document

Borau, K., Luo, H., Shen, L., Shen, R., Tan, X. y Ullrich, C. (2008). Why Web 2.0 is good for learning and for research: Principles and prototypes [online article]. In: Proceedings of the 17th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW2008). ACM Digital Library.

Brown, T. (2006). Beyond constructivism: Navigationism in the knowledge era [online article]. On the Horizon, 4(3), 108-120. Emerald Group database.

Creswell, J. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Creswell, J. (2008). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Ebner, M. (2007). E–learning 2.0 = e–learning 1.0 + Web 2.0? The Second International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security, 1235–1239 (ARES'07).

Publikováno

2016-04-13

Číslo

Sekce

Articles