EXPLORING PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS’ EXPERIENCE WITH THE USE OF SMARTPHONES DURING THE INTERNSHIP PERIOD - CASE STUDY: CRMEF OF RABAT, MOROCCO
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejoe.v8i2.4765Nyckelord:
technology, smartphones, readiness, teaching, pre-service teachers in Morocco, concerns, Moroccan educationAbstract
This study intends to explore Moroccan English pre-service teachers’ experience with using cell phones during their internships. Nineteen instructors were picked at random from the Rabat CRMEF (Regional Center for Education and Training Professions). Interviews were conducted with all nineteen participants. The results displayed that trainees’ preconception on the complexity of using smartphones may affect their tendency on employing this mobile tool as an instructional medium. The findings also revealed that pre-service teachers are not ready to integrate smartphones in EFL classrooms due to the lack of ICT training, distractions that smartphones bring about, and schools’ policies banning the use of this gadget.Referenser
Al-Awidi, H., & Aldhafeeri, F. (2017). Teachers' Readiness to Implement Digital Curriculum in Kuwaiti Schools. Journal of Information Technology Education, 16(1).
Al-Furaih, S. A., & Al-Awidi, H. M. (2020). Teachers’ change readiness for the adoption of smartphone technology: Personal concerns and technological competency. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 25(2), 409-432.
Alghazi, S. S., Wong, S. Y., Kamsin, A., Yadegaridehkordi, E., & Shuib, L. (2020). Towards sustainable mobile learning: A brief review of the factors influencing acceptance of the use of mobile phones as learning tools. Sustainability, 12(24), 10527.
Alzubi, A. (2019). Teachers’ perceptions on using smartphones in English as a foreign language context. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 4(1), 92 104.
Barnwell, P. (2016, April 27). Should Smartphones Be Banned from Classrooms? Do Smartphones Help or Hurt Students’ Academic Achievement? - the Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2016/04/do-smartphones-have-aplace-in-the-classroom/480231/
Beland, L. P., & Murphy, R. (2016). Ill communication: Technology, distraction & student performance. Labour Economics, 41, 61-76.
Bere, A., and Rambe, P. (2019). Understanding mobile learning using a social embeddedness approach: a case of instant messaging. Int. J. Educ. Dev. Using Inf. Commun. Technol. 15, 132–153.
Brown, S. (2018). An investigation of faculty perceptions about mobile learning in higher education (Doctoral dissertation). Nova Southeastern University. Retrieved from NSUWorks, Abraham S. Fischler College of Education.
Campbell, S. (2006). Perceptions of Mobile Phones in College Classrooms: Ringing, Cheating, and Classroom Policies. Communication Education, 55(3), 280-294.
Carr, N. (2011). The shallows: What the internet is doing to our brains. WW Norton & Company, New York/London.
Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (2017). Validating a mobile learning readiness survey: Assessing teachers' dispositions toward adoption. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 33(4), 148-159.
Dehkordi, M. E. (2018). Iranian Male and Female EFL Learners â€TM Perceptions toward the Use of Mobile Assisted Language Learning. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 5(3), 56–66.
Devices in the Classroom. (n.d.). Devices in the Classroom | Derek Bok Center, Harvard University. https://bokcenter.harvard.edu/technology-and-studentdistraction
Duncan, D. K., Hoekstra, A. R., & Wilcox, B. R. (2012). Digital devices, distraction and student performance-does cell phone use reduce learning? In American astronomical society meeting abstracts# 219 (Vol. 219).
Felisoni D. D., Godoi A.S. (2018). Cell phone usage and academic performance: An experiment Computers and Education, 117, pp. 175-187.
Fu, J. S. (2013). ICT in Education: A Critical Literature Review and Its Implications. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 9(1), 112–125. https://doi.org/http://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu/viewarticle.php?id=1541
Graham, E. (2020, June 19). Using Smartphones in the Classroom | NEA. Using Smartphones in the Classroom | NEA. https://www.nea.org/professionalexcellence/student-engagement/tools-tips/using-smartphones-classroom
Hao, Y., & Lee, K. S. (2017). Inquiry of pre-service teachers’ concern about integrating Web 2.0 into instruction. European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(2), 191-209.
Harendita, M. E. (2013). Why resist? A closer look at Indonesian teachers’ resistance to ICT. International Journal of Indonesian Studies, 1(2), 79–109. Retrieved from http://artsonline.monash.edu.au/indonesian-studiesjournal/files/2013/11/3- Monica.pdf
Hsu, C. Y., Liang, J. C., Chuang, T. Y., Chai, C. S., & Tsai, C. C. (2021). Probing in-service elementary school teachers’ perceptions of TPACK for games, attitudes towards games, and actual teaching usage: a study of their structural models and teaching experiences. Educational Studies, 47(6), 734-750.
Iqbal, S., Khan, M. N., & Malik, I. R. (2017). Mobile phone usage and students’ perception towards M-learning: A case of undergraduate students in Pakistan. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 32(1). 1–16.
Kee, C. L., & Samsudin, D. Z. (2014). Mobile Devices: Toys or Learning Tools for the 21 Century Teenagers. The Turkish International Journal of language Education, Vol. 4 No.1, March 2020 pp. 38-47 46 Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(3), 107–122.
Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Shield, L. (2008). An overview of mobile assisted language learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. ReCALL, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344008000335
Manuguerra, M., & Petocz, P. (2011). Promoting student engagement by integrating new technology into tertiary education: The role of the iPad. Asian Social Science, 7(11), 61.
McAfee. (2012, June 25). The digital divide: How the online behavior of teens is getting past parents. https://docplayer.net/16377547-The-digital-divide-how-theonline-behavior-ofteens-is-getting-past-parents.html
Nikolopoulou, K., Gialamas, V., Lavidas, K., & Komis, V. (2021). Teachers’ readiness to adopt mobile learning in classrooms: A study in Greece. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 26(1), 53-77.
Ophir, E., Nass, C., & Wagner, A. D. (2009). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(37), 15583 15587.
Pickett, A. D., & Thomas, C. (2006). Turn off that phone. American School Board Journal, 193(4), 40-44.
Rosen, L. D., Lim, A., Carrier, M., & Cheever, N. A. (2011). An empirical examination of the educational impact of text message-induced task switching in the classroom: Educational implications and strategies to enhance learning. Psicologia Educativa, 29(2), 163-177.
Seifert, T. (2018, March). Smartphone implementation from lecturers, teachers, students and pupils’ perspectives. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 795-801). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Terry, G., Hayfield, N., Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology, 2, 17-37.
Tindell, D., & Bohlander, R. (2012). The use and abuse of cell phones and text messaging in the classroom: a survey of college students. College Teaching, 60(1), 1-9.
Wahyuni, S. (2019, September). Examining Pre-Service Teachers’ Use of Technology: Implications for Curriculum Development. In UNNES International Conference on ELTLT (pp. 278-284).
Wilmer, H. H., Sherman, L. E., & Chein, J. M. (2017). Smartphones and cognition: A review of research exploring the links between mobile technology habits and Cognitive functioning. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(605), 1-16.
Nedladdningar
Publicerad
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


