INFLUENCE OF DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DELTA STATE SKILLS TRAINING AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP PROGRAMME (STEP)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejoe.v8i3.4977Keywords:
demographic factors, evaluation, skills training and entrepreneurship programme, empowerment programmes, Delta StateAbstract
This study evaluated the influence of Demographic factors on the implementation of the Delta State Skills Training and Entrepreneurship Programme (STEP). The population of the study comprised 4,559 beneficiaries. A sample size of 1,000 beneficiaries was selected through proportionate stratified and convenience sampling techniques. The questionnaire was used to collect data. Experts’ judgement was used to validate the instrument. The test-retest method of reliability was used to determine the reliability of the instrument, with a coefficient of 0.82. Frequency and percentage were used to analyse the data. The findings of the study revealed that there is a significant difference between male and female beneficiaries of the STEP on the establishment of their own enterprises after graduating from the programme; that there is a significant difference between male and female beneficiaries of the STEP on their employment of other youths after graduating from the programme; and that there is no significant difference among beneficiaries of the STEP on the establishment of their own enterprises on the basis of their marital status after graduating from the programme. The study further showed that there is no significant difference among beneficiaries of the STEP on the employment of other youths on the basis of their marital status after graduating from the programme; that there is a significant difference among beneficiaries of the STEP on the establishment of their own enterprises on the basis of their educational qualification after graduating from the programme; and that there is no significant difference among beneficiaries of the STEP on their employment of other youths on the basis of their educational qualification after graduating from the programme. The study recommended amongst others that the program be expanded to accommodate more economically viable skills and vocations, including commerce/trade apprenticeship.References
Ackerly, B. (1995). Testing the Tools of Development: Credit Programs, Loan Involvement, and Women's Empowerment. IDS Bulletin, 26(3), 56-68.
Aguda-Oluwo, A. A., & Oni, A. (2017). Impact of self-esteem and marital status on the desire to attain economic empowerment among women in South West, Nigeria. Sociology and Social Work Review, 22-34.
Arano, K., Parker, C., & Terry, R. L. (2010). Gender-Based Risk Aversion and Retirement Asset Allocation. Economic Inquiry, 48(1), 147–155.
Badunenko, O., Barasinska, N., and Schï¿ 1 2fer, D. (2009). Risk attitude and investment decisions across European countries: Are women more conservative investors than men? Working Paper / FINESS 6.2, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research. 2
Banabo, E. & Ndiomu, K. (2011). Skills acquisition and skills acquisition education (EE): Strategy for sustainable development. Asian Journal of Business Management, 3(3), 196 –197.
Bates, T. (1995). Self-employment entry across industry groups. Journal of Business Venturing, 10, 143–156.
Blanchflower, D. G. (2000). Self-employment in OECD countries. Labour Economics, 7, 471–505.
Blau, D. (1985). Self-employment and self-selection in developing country labor markets. Southern Economic Journal, 52(4), 351–63
Blau, D. (1987). A time-series analysis of self-employment in the United States. Journal of Political Economy, 95(3), 445–467.
Blossfeld, H. P., & Drobnic, S. (2001). Careers of Couples in Contemporary Societies: From Male Breadwinner to Dual Earner Families. Oxford: University Press.
Booth, A. L., & Nolen, P. J. (2009). Gender Differences in Risk Behaviour: Does Nurture Matter? IZA Discussion Papers 4026, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
Budig, M. J. (2006). Gender, self-employment, and earnings: The interlocking structures of family and professional status. Gender and Society, 20(6), 725–753.
Buttler, D., & Sierminska, E. (2011). Risk, Sex Differences and Self-Employment.
Clain, S. H. (2000). Gender differences in full-time self-employment. Journal of Economics and Business, 52, pp. 499–513.
Cowling, M. (2000). Are entrepreneurs different across countries? Applied Economics Letters, 7, 785–789. 3, 11
Croson, R. and Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 448–474.
Devine, T. (1994a). Characteristics of self-employed women in the United States. Monthly Labor Review, March 20–34.
Devine, T. (1994b). Changes in wage-and-salary returns to skill and the recent rise in female self-employment. American Economic Review 84(2):108–113.
Devine, Theresa J. (1994). Characteristics of Self-Employed Women in the United States." Monthly Labor Review, Vol. 117, No. 3 (March), pp. 20-34.
Duncan, G. and Hoffman, S. (1985). A reconsideration of the economic consequences of marital dissolution. Demography, 22, 485–497.
Erikitola, J. O., & Omoregie, C. O. (2019). Employment Generation Programmes and Women Empowerment in Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice, 10(29), 45-50.
Evans, D., & Jovanovic, B. (1989). An estimated model of entrepreneurial choice under liquidity constraints. Journal of Political Economy 97(4):808–827.
Georgellis, Y. & Wall, H. (2005). Gender differences in self-employment. International Review of Applied Economics, 19(3):321–342. 3, 11, 12
Gupta V. K., Turban D. B., Wasti S. A., Sikdar A. (2009). The role of gender stereotypes in perceptions of entrepreneurs and intentions to become an entrepreneur. Entrep Theory Pract 33: 397–417.
Hess., G. (2004). Marriage and Consumption Insurance: What's Love Got to Do with It?, Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 112(2), pages 290- 318, April.
Kishor, S. (2000). Empowerment of Women in Egypt and links to the Survival and Health of their Infants. In H. Presser & G. sen (Eds.), Empowerment and Demographic Processes: Moving Beyond Cairo (pp. 20-24). New York: Oxford University Press.
Lombard, K. V. (2001). Female self-employment and demand for flexible, non-standard work schedules, Economic Inquiry, 39, pp. 214–237.
Mason, K., & Smith, H. (2003). Women's Empowerment and Social Context: Results from Five Asian Countries. Paper presented at the Gender and Development Group.
Moore, R. (1983a). Employer discrimination: Evidence from self-employed workers. Review of Economics and Statistics 65(3):496–501.
Moore, R. (1983b). Self-employment and the incidence of the payroll tax. National Tax Journal 36(4):491–501.
Opeala, A. G. (1996). Conflicting Gender, Kin, and Couple Dynamic of Nigerian Immigrant Families in Canada. University of Windsor, Canada.
Ovharhe, O. J., & Gbigbi, M. T. (2016). Socio-economic determinants of youth empowerment by Fadama III project in Delta State, Nigeria: Implications for agricultural transformation. International Journal of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development Studies, 3(1), 12-20.
Ozcan, S. and Reichstein, T. (2009). Transition to Entrepreneurship from the Public Sector: Predispositional and Contextual Effects. Management Science. 55(4): 604-618
Parker, S. C. (2009). The Economics of Entrepreneurship. Cambridge University Press. 3, 9
Parker, Simon C. (2008). Entrepreneurship among married couples in the United States: A simultaneous probit approach, Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 459-481, June.
Verbakel, Ellen & Paul M. de Graaf (2009). Partner Effects on Labour Market Participation and Job Level:Opposing Mechanisms. Work, Employment & Society, 23(4): 635-654.
Vijayanthi, K. (2002). Women's Empowerment Through Self-help Groups: A Participatory Approach. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 9(2), 263.
Yuengert, A. (1994). Testing hypotheses of immigrant self-employment. Journal of Human Resources 30(1):194–204.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


