THE PROSPECTS AND CHALLENGES OF OPEN EDUCATION AND E-LEARNING IN RELIGIOUS AND MORAL EDUCATION (R.M.E.) IN GHANA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejoe.v11i2.6758关键词:
open education, e-learning, religious and moral education, digital pedagogy摘要
The rise of open education and e-learning is reshaping global education systems, including Religious and Moral Education (RME) in Ghana. This study examines the prospects and challenges of integrating digital learning into RME using qualitative interpretive analysis of literature and context. Findings show that e-learning enhances accessibility, learner-centered instruction, collaboration, and inclusive participation across diverse learners in Ghana. However, challenges such as digital inequality, poor infrastructure, limited teacher training, and weak connectivity hinder effective implementation. The study further identifies risks, including misinformation, ethical concerns, and reduced interpersonal engagement in moral learning. It argues for culturally grounded frameworks emphasizing relationality, empathy, and shared humanity. Ultimately, the study concludes that successful integration requires ethical digital literacy, inclusive policy support, infrastructure development, and culturally responsive pedagogy. It contributes an African-centered perspective linking technology with moral education for sustainable educational transformation in Ghana. It emphasizes balancing innovation with moral responsibility in order to preserve the ethical essence of RME within digital environments. The paper also highlights the importance of teacher capacity building, equitable access to technology, and the integration of African values in digital pedagogy to ensure holistic learner development. By situating RME within a culturally responsive digital framework, the study offers practical and theoretical contributions to educational transformation in Ghana and similar contexts. Overall, it suggests that e-learning can strengthen moral education if guided by ethics, inclusion, and African philosophical values. Thus, sustainable adoption depends on infrastructure, pedagogy, and strong ethical governance in schools across the Ghanaian education system.参考
Adarkwah, M. A. (2021). “I’m not against online teaching, but what about us?” ICT in Ghana post COVID-19. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 1665–1685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10331-z
Agyemang, C., & Frempong, G. (2023). Digital inequality and access to online education in Ghana. Information Development, 39(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669211009478
Ahenkan, A., & Osei-Kojo, A. (2022). E-learning adoption challenges in developing countries. International Journal of Educational Development, 89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102537
Akyeampong, K. (2020). Teacher policy and inclusive education in Ghana. Comparative Education, 56(4), 472–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2020.1781397
Alhassan, R. (2021). Exploring digital learning readiness in Ghanaian colleges of education. Journal of Education and Learning, 10(3), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v10n3p112
Amponsah, S., & Bekoe, S. (2022). Integration of ICT in Religious and Moral Education. Journal of Curriculum Studies Research, 4(2), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.46303/jcsr.2022.7
Anderson, T. (2020). The theory and practice of online learning (3rd ed., pp. 1–484). Athabasca University Press. https://doi.org/10.15215/aupress/9781771992329.01
Annan, J., & Mensah, F. (2023). E-learning and moral education in Africa. African Educational Research Journal, 11(2), 150–162. https://doi.org/10.30918/AERJ.112.23.021
Asamoah, E., & Yeboah-Assiamah, E. (2022). Ubuntu and digital pedagogy in African education. Cogent Education, 9(1), 2050193. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2050193
Bates, A. W. (2022). Teaching in a digital age (3rd ed., pp. 1–552). BCcampus. https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0372916
Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. C. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3778083
Campbell, H. A., & Evolvi, G. (2019). Contextualizing digital religion studies. New Media & Society, 21(11–12), 2380–2397. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819837724
Cheong, P. H. (2021). Digital religion and mediated moralities. Journal of Religion, Media and Digital Culture, 10(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1163/21659214-bja10038
Christensen, C. M., Horn, M. B., & Staker, H. (2020). Blended learning in action (pp. 1–320). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119513476
Czerniewicz, L., et al. (2020). A wake-up call: Equity in higher education. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 946–967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00187-4
Daniel, J. (2020). Education and the COVID-19 pandemic. Prospects, 49(1–2), 91–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09464-3
Dede, C. (2021). The role of digital technologies in deeper learning. Educational Technology, 61(3), 14–21. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED561254.pdf
Eshun, I., & Osei-Poku, P. (2021). Curriculum transformation in Ghanaian education. International Journal of Curriculum Development, 13(2), 89–105.
Garrison, D. R. (2021). E-learning in the 21st century (3rd ed., pp. 1–216). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315667263
Guri-Rosenblit, S. (2020). Distance education in the digital age. Distance Education, 41(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1727298
Hodges, C., et al. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review, 27(1), 1–12. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
Kumi-Yeboah, A., & Smith, P. (2021). Digital divide in African education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(4), 2135–2153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09987-5
Mensah, F., & Nabie, M. J. (2022). Teacher preparedness for online instruction in Ghana. Education Sciences, 12(5), 322–336. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12050322
Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2021). Distance education: A systems view of online learning (4th ed., pp. 1–368). Wadsworth. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
Naidu, S. (2021). Building resilience in education systems. Distance Education, 42(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2021.1885096
Nyadzi, E., et al. (2024). Policy reforms and digital education in Ghana. International Journal of Educational Development, 99, 102763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2024.102763
Osei, G. M. (2021). Open educational resources in Ghana. Open Learning, 36(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2020.1839031
Selwyn, N. (2022). Education and technology: Key issues and debates (3rd ed., pp. 1–240). Bloomsbury. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-022-09971-9
Siemens, G. (2021). Connectivism: Learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology, 2(1), 3–10. Retrieved from https://static1.squarespace.com/static/6820668911e3e5617c36c48c/t/682dadc9690ec5749004d96d/1747824073835/connectivism.pdf
UNESCO. (2023). Digital learning and transformation of education in Africa (pp. 1–150). UNESCO Publishing. https://doi.org/10.54675/UNESCO.2023.9789231005306
##submission.downloads##
已出版
期次
栏目
##submission.license##
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


