BEYOND ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT: UTILIZING AI-GENERATED SOCIAL NARRATIVES TO ENHANCE THE SOCIAL DIMENSION OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION

المؤلفون

  • Marina Louari Special Education Department, University of Thessaly, Greece

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejse.v12i7.7026

الكلمات المفتاحية:

artificial intelligence، inclusive education، social narratives

الملخص

Despite the rapid growth of Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications in education, mainstream research remains heavily skewed toward academic achievement, curriculum accessibility, and personalized instruction. Consequently, the social dimension of inclusion—specifically peer acceptance, social interaction, and a student's sense of belonging—has been systematically neglected. To address this critical gap, this conceptual paper proposes a multidimensional theoretical framework illustrating how AI-generated social narratives can function as a pedagogical mechanism to support the social inclusion of elementary school students with disabilities. Grounded in a synthesis of complementary theoretical perspectives, including the Need to Belong Theory, Social Identity Theory, Contact Theory, Narrative Transportation Theory, and Recognition Theory, the framework delineates three distinct yet interrelated pathways to social inclusion: (a) a direct pathway linking narrative-induced perspective-taking and empathy to peer acceptance, (b) an indirect pathway operating through the cultivation of a supportive and inclusive classroom climate, and (c) a symbolic pathway achieved through representation, visibility, and validation of diverse identities. Furthermore, the paper critically contrasts AI-generated narratives with traditional social stories, highlighting the transformative potential of generative AI in terms of real-time personalization, adaptive responsiveness, contextual immediacy, and student co-construction. Finally, a roadmap for future empirical and longitudinal research is outlined, focusing on the verification of the proposed pathways, ethical safeguards, and the role of human oversight. Ultimately, the framework shifts the evaluation of educational AI beyond learning outcomes toward fostering authentic belonging within inclusive school communities.

السيرة الشخصية للمؤلف

  • Marina Louari، Special Education Department, University of Thessaly, Greece
    The author is Doctor in Special Education and teaches in the Department of Special Education at the University of Thessaly. Her research interests focus on the multi-level inclusion of individuals with disabilities in educational, professional, and broader social contexts. She has collaborated extensively with general and special education teachers, as well as with organizations representing individuals with disabilities.

المراجع

Ainscow, M. (2020). Promoting inclusion and equity in education: Lessons from international experiences. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 6(1), 7-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2020.1729587

Allen, K. A., & Kern, P. L. (2017). School Belonging in Adolescents: Theory, Research and Practice. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5996-4_3

Allen, K. A., Kern, M. L., Vella-Brodrick, D., Hattie, J., & Waters, L. (2018). What schools need to know about fostering school belonging: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30(1), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9389-8

Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1954-07324-000

Arslan, G. (2021). School belongingness, well-being, and mental health among adolescents: exploring the role of loneliness. Australian Journal of Psychology, 73, 70 - 80. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530.2021.1904499

Au, A., Caltabiano, N. J., & Vaksman, O. (2023). The impact of sense of belonging, resilience, time management skills and academic performance on psychological well-being among university students. Cogent Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2023.2215594

Batson, C. D., Early, S., & Salvarani, G. (1997). Perspective taking: Imagining how another feels versus imagining how you would feel. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(7), 751-758. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297237008

Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497

Booth, T., & Ainscow, M. (2011). The Index for Inclusion: Developing learning and participation in schools (3rd ed.). Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education.

Bossaert, G., Colpin, H., Pijl, S. J., & Petry, K. (2013). Truly included? A literature study focusing on the social dimension of inclusion in education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17(1), 60-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2011.580464

Dalgaard, N. T., Bondebjerg, A., Viinholt, B. C. A., & Filges, T. (2022). The effects of inclusion on academic achievement, socioemotional development and wellbeing of children with special educational needs. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1291

de Boer, A., Pijl, S. J., & Minnaert, A. (2012). Students’ attitudes towards peers with disabilities: A review of the literature. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 59(4), 379-392. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2012.723944

Dumitru, C., Abdulsahib, G. M., Khalaf, O. I., & Bennour, A. (2026). Integrating artificial intelligence in supporting students with disabilities in higher education: An integrative review. Technology and Disability, 38(1), 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/10554181251355428

Florian, L. (2014). What counts as evidence of inclusive education? European Journal of Special Needs Education, 29(3), 286-294. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2014.933551

Garrote, G. (2017). Relationship between the social participation and social skills of pupils with an intellectual disability: A study in inclusive classrooms. Frontline Learning Research, 5(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v5i1.266

Goodenow, C. (1993). The psychological sense of school membership among adolescents: Scale development and educational correlates. Psychology in the Schools, 30(1), 79-90. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6807(199301)30:1

Gray, C. (2015). The New Social Story Book (15th Anniversary Edition). Future Horizons.

Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701-721. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701

Holmes, W., & Tuomi, I. (2022). State of the art and practice in AI in education. European Journal of Education, 57(4), 542-570. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12533

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332180327_Artificial_Intelligence_in_Education_Promise_and_Implications_for_Teaching_and_Learning

Honneth, A. (1995). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Polity Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/The_Struggle_for_Recognition.html?id=Gsd3PwAACAAJ&redir_esc=y

Korpershoek, H., Canrinus, E. T., Fokkens-Bruinsma, M., & de Boer, H. (2020). The relationships between school belonging and students’ motivational, social-emotional, behavioural, and academic outcomes in secondary education: A meta-analytic review. Research Papers in Education, 35(6), 641-680. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2019.1615116

Koster, M., Nakken, H., Pijl, S. J., & van Houten, E. (2009). Being part of the peer group: A literature study focusing on the social dimension of inclusion in education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 13(2), 117-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110701284680

Li, J., Yan, Y., & Zeng, X. (2025). Exploring artificial intelligence in inclusive education: A systematic review of empirical studies. Applied Sciences, 15(23), 12624. https://doi.org/10.3390/app152312624

Lindsay, S., & Edwards, A. (2012). A systematic review of disability awareness interventions for children and youth. Disability and Rehabilitation, 35(8), 623–646. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2012.702850

Louari M. (2017). Friendship formation in inclusive settings. Is bibliotherapy an effective strategy? in A. Hudelist, & F. Auernig (Eds) Proceedings of 19th European Conference on Literacy, “Literacy in the new Landscape of Communication. Research, Education and the Everyday”, p.p.32-38. Austrian Literacy Association: Graz, Austria. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.10521.42083

Mar, R. A., & Oatley, K. (2008). The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(3), 173-192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00073.x

Mazzocco, P. J., Green, M. C., Sasota, J. A., & Jones, N. W. (2010). This story is not for everyone: Transportability and narrative persuasion. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1(4), 361-368. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550610376600

Melo-López, V.-A., Basantes-Andrade, A., Gudiño-Mejía, C.-B., & Hernández-Martínez, E. (2025). The impact of artificial intelligence on inclusive education: A systematic review. Education Sciences, 15(5), 539. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15050539

More, C. M. (2008). Social stories and young children with autism spectrum disorders: A descriptive review of research. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36(2), 127-144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-008-0261-0

Nantaburom, S., & Wetcho, S. (2026). The role of artificial intelligence in special and inclusive education: A systematic literature review. Contemporary Educational Technology, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/18489

Norwich, B. (2013). Addressing Tensions and Dilemmas in Inclusive Education: Living with uncertainty. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.154

Osterman, K. F. (2000). Students’ need for belonging in the school community. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 323-367. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070003323

Paglialunga, A., & Melogno, S. (2025). The effectiveness of artificial intelligence-based interventions for students with learning disabilities: A systematic review. Brain Sciences, 15(8), 806. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15080806

Reynhout, G., & Carter, M. (2006). Social Stories™ for children with disabilities. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(4), 445-469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-006-0086-1

Sakowich M., & Hamidi, F. (2025). Generative AI for Inclusive Education: Supporting

Students with Disabilities Through Universal Design for

Learning. American Journal of STEM Education: Issues and Perspectives

Star Scholars Press, 15, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.32674/yeyaaq64

Schwab, S. (2018). Attitudes Towards Inclusive Schooling. A study on Students’, Teachers’, and Parents’ attitudes. Waxmann. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Attitudes_Towards_Inclusive_Schooling.html?id=yVZtDwAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y

Schwab, S., Lehofer, M. L., & Tanzer, N. (2021). The impact of social behavior and peers’ attitudes toward students with special educational needs on self-reported peer interactions. Frontiers in Education, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.561662

Slee, R. (2011). The Irregular School: Exclusion, schooling and inclusive education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9604.2011.01502_2.x

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Nelson-Hall. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203505984-16

Turner, R. N., Crisp, R. J., & Lambert, E. (2007). Imagining intergroup contact can improve intergroup attitudes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10(4), 427-441. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430207081533

UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report 2020: Inclusion and education: All means all. UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/en/gem-report/report/2020/inclusion

Voultsiou, E., & Moussiades, L. (2025). A systematic review of AI, VR, and LLM applications in special education: Opportunities, challenges, and future directions. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 19141-19181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13550-4

Vyrastekova, J. (2021). Social inclusion of students with special educational needs assessed by the Inclusion of Other in the Self scale. PLOS ONE, 16(4), e0250070. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250070

Walter, A. (2025). Enhancing Special Education with Generative AI: Suggestions from our Practice. Thresholds in Education, 48(2), 202-225. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1483969

Wenger, I., Schulze, C., Lundström, U., & Prellwitz, M. (2021). Children’s perceptions of playing on inclusive playgrounds: A qualitative study. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 28(2), 136-146. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2020.1810768

Wright, S. C., Aron, A., McLaughlin-Volpe, T., & Ropp, S. A. (1997). The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross-group friendships and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), 73-90. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.73

Yildirim, Y., Keshavarzi, G., & Aman, A. R. (2022). Does play-based experience provide for inclusiveness? A case study of multi-dimensional indicators. Child Indicators Research, 15(6), 2197-2214 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-022-09951-3

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(39), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

التنزيلات

منشور

2026-09-18

إصدار

مجلد 12 عدد 7 (2026)

القسم

Articles

الرخصة

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

 

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

 

  1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

 

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).