INCLUSIVE EDUCATION: WHICH INCLUSION MODEL PROVIDES ACADEMIC GAINS FOR STUDENTS WITH MILD TO SEVERE DISABILITIES IN THE SECONDARY SETTING?

Authors

  • Duska Fields Jacksonville State University, USA
  • Joseph Akpan Jacksonville State University, USA
  • Lawrence Beard Jacksonville State University, USA
  • Charles Notar Emeriti, Jacksonville State University, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejse.v0i0.1361

Keywords:

inclusive education, inclusion model, mild to severe disabilities

Abstract

A major premise of inclusive education for students with mild-severe disabilities is to provide skills, which enable them to live, work, and participate in an integrated community of life-long learners. Inclusive education would lead these students to greater independence and opportunity to be educated together in age appropriate general education classrooms. Three inclusion models were compared to determine which model would produce higher gains, both academically and socially in a high school multi-disability classroom. All three groups were their own control groups. Students were assigned to groups based on intellectual functioning and individual needs. Each group consisted of students that were relatively higher functioning, relatively lower functioning and students with severe needs. The settings included a general education classroom with adult/paraprofessional interaction, a general education setting with peer interactions or a small group instructional classroom with peer directed instructional activities. A constant comparison methodology was used to analyze the data across three groups and role of stakeholders. Findings revealed the benefits of inclusive education for all students, but the gains varied depending on the setting/inclusion model used.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

References

Alberto, P. A., Fredrick, L. D. (2011). Integrated literacy for students with moderate and severe disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 12, 203-228.

Brown, F., & Michaels, C. A. (2006). School-wide positive behavior support initiatives and students with severe disabilities: A time for reflection. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31, 57-61.

Carter, E. W., & Hughes, C. (2006). Including high school students with severe disabilities in general education class: Perspectives of general and special educators, paraprofessionals, and administrators. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31, 174-185.

Crimmins, D., & Farrell, A. F. (2006). Individualized behavioral supports at 15 years: It’s still lonely at top. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31-45.

Downing, J. E., & Peckham-Hardin, K. D. (2007). Inclusive education: What makes it a good education for students with moderate to severe disabilities? Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 32, (1), 16-30.

Gallagher, P. A., & Lambert, R. G. (2006). Classroom quality, concentration of children with special needs, and child outcomes in Head Start. Exceptional Children, 73, 31-52.

Skrtic, T. (1991). Behind Special Education: A Critical Analysis of Professional Culture and School Organization. Denver: Love Publishing Co.

Sailor, W., & Roger, B. (2005). Rethinking Inclusion: Schoolwide Applications. Phi Delta Kappan, March, 2005, 503-510.

Stevens, B., Kozar-Kocsis, S. (2002). What are Teachers Doing to Accommodate for Special Needs Students in the Classroom?, Electronic Journal for Inclusive Education, 1 (6).

Verbeke, K. A. (2002). Identifying Accommodations for Inclusion Settings: A Strategy for Special and General Educators, Electronic Journal for Inclusive Education, 1 (6).

Downloads

Published

2018-01-08

Issue

Vol 3, No 1 (2018)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

 

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

 

  1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

 

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).