THE EFFECT OF FAMILY ENVIRONMENT CONDITIONS ON THE EMERGENCE AND / OR THE CULTIVATION OF LEARNING DIFFICULITIES IN PRE-SCHOOL AND PRIMARY-SCHOOL AGED CHILDREN: GREEK KINDERGARTEN TEACHERS VIEWS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejse.v0i0.1437Keywords:
Learning Difficulties (LDs), pre–school age, family environment, emergence, cultivationAbstract
The study investigates the empirical aspects of Greek kindergarten teachers regarding the topic of the existence of the effect that the family has on the emergence and / or the cultivation of Learning Difficulties in pre – school and primary – school aged children. The research involved 23 teachers (22 women and 1 man) who, citing the possibility of early detection of Learning Difficulties (LDs) offered to them due to the daily contact with the children as part of the classroom, reported on whether the relationship between the two parents, but also between them and the child itself, may affect the appearance and / or the cultivation of Learning Difficulties in it. Furthermore, this work investigates the relevance of the provided parental stimuli and the educational level of the parents with the LDs of these children. The survey was conducted through semi-structured interviews the results of which were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. According to the findings, effective identification of children LDs is achieved by the kindergarten teachers through observation of the children's response to free and organized activities. In addition, the relations between the couple of mother and father, as well as the relationship between the parents and their child were considered by teachers worthy predictors of the effect that the institution of family has on the learning process and career of pre – school and primary school children. Finally, the stimuli that parents provide with their children were associated with the LDs that the offspring have or might develop in the future, as opposed to the educational level of both parents which teachers did not associate with the good or poor academic performance of students.
Article visualizations:
References
Al – Yagon, M. (2007). Socioemotional and behavioral adjustment among school – age children with learning disabilities. The moderating role of maternal personal resources. The journal of special education. 40(4). 205 – 217.
Casanova, P. F., Garcia – Linares, M. C., J. de la Torre, M., M. de la Villa, C. (2005). Influence of family and socio – demographic variables on students with low academic achievement. Educational psychology. 25(4). 423 – 435.
Catts, H. W., Fey, M. E. Zhang, X., Tomblin, J. B. (2001). Estimating the risk of future reading difficulties in kindergarten children: A research – based model and its clinical implementation. Language, speech, and hearing services in schools. 32(1). 38 – 50.
Conlon, E. G., Zimmer – Gembeck, M. J., Creed, P. A., Tucker, M. (2006). Family history, self – perceptions, attitudes and cognitive abilities are associated with early adolescent reading skills. Journal of research in reading. 29(1). 11 – 32.
Cortiella, C. (2011). The State of learning disabilities. New York: National center for learning disabilities.
Davis – Kean, P. E. (2005). The influence of parent education and family income on child achievement: the indirect role of parental expectations and the home environment. Journal of family psychology. 19(2). 294 – 304.
Dyson, L. L. (2003). Children with learning disabilities within the family context: a comparison with siblings in global self – concept, academic self – perception, and social competence. Learning disabilities research & practice. 18(1). 1 – 9.
Elder, T. E., & Lubotsky, D. H. (2009). Kindergarten entrance age and children's achievement impacts of state policies, family background, and peers. Journal of human resources. 44(3). 641 – 683.
Fletcher, J. M. (2012). Classification and identification of learning disabilities. In B. Wong & D. Butler (Eds.). Learning about learning disabilities (4th ed., pp. 1-25). London. UK: Elsevier.
Friend, A., DeFries, J. C., Olson, R. K. (2008). Parental education moderates genetic influences on reading disability. Psychological science. 19(11). 1124 – 1130.
Gross, S. J., Mettelman, B. B., Dye, T. D., Slagle, T. A. (2001). Impact of family structure and stability on academic outcome in preterm children at 10 years of age. The journal of pediatrics. 138(2). 169 – 175.
Heiman, T. (2002). Parents of children with disabilities: resilience, coping, and future expectations. Journal of developmental and physical disabilities. 14(2). 159 – 171.
Heiman, T., & Berger, O. (2008). Parents of children with Asperger syndrome or with learning disabilities: family environment and social support. Research in developmental disabilities. 29. 289 – 300.
Hindman, A. H., Skibbe, L. E., Miller, A., Zimmerman, M. (2010). Ecological contexts and early learning: contributions of child, family, and classroom factors during Head Start, to literacy and mathematics growth through first grade. Early childhood research quarterly. 25. 235 – 250.
Idan, O., & Margalit, M. (2014). Socioemotional self – perceptions, family climate, and hopeful thinking among students with learning disabilities and typically achieving students from the same classes. Journal of learning disabilities. 47(2). 136 – 152.
Lindstrom, L., Doren, B., Metheny, J., Johnson, P., Zane, C. (2007). Transition to employment: role of the family in career development. Exceptional children. 73(3). 348 – 366.
Marchant, G. J., Paulson, S. E., Rothlisberg, B. A. (2001). Relations of middle school students' perceptions of family and school contexts with academic achievement. Psychology in the schools. 38(6). 505 – 519.
Niklas, F., & Schneider, W. (2013). Home literacy environment and the beginning of reading and spelling. Contemporary educational psychology. 38(1). 40 – 50.
Olson, D. H. (2000). Circumplex model of marital and family systems. Journal of family therapy. 22. 144 – 167.
Petrill, S. A., Deater – Deckard, K., Thompson, L. A., DeThorne, L. S., Schatschneider C. (2006). Reading skills in early readers: genetic and shared environmental influences. Journal of learning disabilities. 39(1). 48 – 55.
Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., McNaughton – Nicholls, C., & Ormston, R. (2014). Qualitative research practice. A guide for social science students and researchers. London: SAGE Publications.
Sarsour, K., Sheridan, M., Jutte, D., Nuru – Jeter, A., Hinshaw, S., Boyce, W. T. (2010). Family socioeconomic status and child executive functions: the roles of language, home environment, and single parenthood. Journal of international neuropsychological society. 17. 120 – 132.
Snowling, M. J., Muter, V., Carroll, J. (2007). Children at family risk of dyslexia: a follow – up in early adolescence. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry. 48(6). 609 – 618.
Thorne, S. (2000). Data analysis in qualitative research. Evidence – based nursing notebook. 3. 68 – 70.
Van Bergen, E., Bishop, D., Van Zuijen, T., De Jong, P. F. (2015). How does parental reading influence children's reading? A study of cognitive mediation. Scientific studies of reading. 19(5). 325 – 339.
Van Bergen, E., Van der Leij, A., De Jong, P. F. (2014). The intergenerational multiple deficit model and the case of dyslexia. Frontiers in human neuroscience. 8(346). 1 – 13.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


