UNDERSTANDING STUDENTS WITH CONVERSION REACTION SYNDROME: A PROPOSED CHC-MHC-FWC FRAMEWORK

Authors

  • Chong Lee Wong

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejse.v0i0.1515

Keywords:

conversion reaction syndrome, Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory, model of hierarchical complexity, feelings wheel chart

Abstract

Conversion Reaction Syndrome (CRS) is used to denote individuals who exhibits psychological stress and then converts by reacting it into physical ways. Symptoms in CRS can vary in severity and may affect movement (weakness or paralysis, loss of balance, and seizures) or senses (vision problems, hearing problems, speech problems that results in slurred speech). Psychological stress in students with learning difficulties may come from parental and teachers’ expectations, peer pressure, poor academic performance, and the inability to cope with stress. With the passage of time, these stress will be induced and gradually be converted into observable behaviors, usually exhibited with the purpose of avoidance. Currently, there is no operational definition of CRS in the field of special education. In this conceptual paper, the author provides an introduction of CRS, proposes a CHC-MHC-FWC framework to understand the syndrome better, and how it affects students’ learning.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

References

American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed. Revised).Washington, DC: APA.

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.

Cattell, R.B. (1963). Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 54(1), 1.

Commons, M. L. (2007). Introduction to the model of hierarchical complexity. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 13, 1–6.

George, J.M. (1996). “Trait and State Affair,” in K.R. Murphy (ed.), Individual differences and behaviour in organisations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, p.145.

Hinton, C., Miyamoto, K., & Della‐Chiesa, B. (2008). Brain research, learning and emotions: implications for education research, policy and practice1. European Journal of Education, 43(1), 87-103.

Manzo, A.V., & Manzo, U.C. (1993). Literacy disorders: Holistic diagnosis and remediation.Missouri: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers

Maslow, A. H. (2013). Toward a psychology of being. Simon and Schuster. See N.H. Frijda. (1993) “Moods, Emotion Episodes and Emotions,” in M. Lewis and J.M. Havil and (ed.). Handbook of Emotions. NY: Guildford Press, 381-403.

Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective Events Theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior: An annual series of analytical essays and critical reviews, 18, 1-74.

World Health Organization. (1992). The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization.

Willcox, G. (1982) A tool for expanding awareness of emotions and increasing spontaneity and intimacy. Transactional Analysis Journal, 12(4), 274-276.

Zeharia, A., Mukamel, M., Carel. C., Weitz, R., Danziger Y., & Mimouni, M. (1999). Conversion reaction: management by the paediatrician. European Journal of Pediatrics, 158(2), 160-164.

Downloads

Published

2018-03-24

Issue

Section

Articles