INVESTIGATING THE CHALLENGES FACED BY INDIVIDUALS WITH APHASIA IN ACCESSING FAIR TRIALS WITHIN THE KENYAN JUDICIAL SYSTEM: A CASE OF MILIMANI LAW COURTS

Autori

  • Onsase Frankline Nyatemu Master’s Student, School of Education, Department of Special Needs Education, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya
  • Mathew Karia Lecturer, Dr., Department of Special Surgeries- ENT Section, School of Health Sciences, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejse.v12i5.6902

Cuvinte cheie:

alternative support mechanisms, fair trials, individuals with aphasia, judicial officers, judicial system, Speech-Language Pathology (SLP) services

Rezumat

The purpose of this study was to investigate the challenges faced by individuals with aphasia in accessing fair trials within the Kenyan judicial system, with a specific focus on Nairobi City. This research was anchored in social support theory, which provided a framework for understanding institutional responses to communication needs and adaptive strategies within legal settings. A mixed-method case study research design was employed, and participants were selected using a purposive sampling technique. The participants included individuals with aphasia, judicial officers, and carers. The research participants were either involved in focus group discussions or filling out structured questionnaires. The collected data were analysed both quantitatively and qualitatively. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, while qualitative data were analysed thematically. Findings revealed that the main barrier to accessing a fair trial was a lack of trained personnel to support aphasia patients, which translates to poor infrastructure within the legal system. A substantial proportion of respondents, including judicial officers themselves, acknowledged limited capacity to effectively communicate with individuals with aphasia. Further to this, lack of trained personnel also leads to inadequate communication aids, which also emerged as the most frequently reported challenge. Another area that was affected was the absence of alternative and augmentative communication (AAC) tools within court settings, which limited the ability of individuals with aphasia to express themselves, comprehend proceedings, and provide accurate testimony. The study concluded that the Kenyan judicial system lacks systematic mechanisms to ensure communicative participation for individuals with aphasia. The study recommended that there be a need for deliberate institutional reform, interdisciplinary collaboration, and policy-driven integration of speech-language pathology expertise within judicial processes. Kenyan courts should allocate resources for the acquisition of AAC tools such as picture boards, written keyword systems, and tablet-based communication applications. These resources should be readily available within court environments to supplement private procurement by litigants. Courts should allow structured breaks, flexible scheduling, and extended response time for individuals with aphasia to reduce fatigue and processing overload.

Biografii autori

  • Onsase Frankline Nyatemu, Master’s Student, School of Education, Department of Special Needs Education, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya

    Nyatemu Onsase Frankline is a Master’s Degree holder in Speech and Language Pathology and Bachelors Degree holder in Special needs education at the Department of Early Childhood and Special Needs Education.

  • Mathew Karia, Lecturer, Dr., Department of Special Surgeries- ENT Section, School of Health Sciences, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya

    Dr. Mathew Kinyua Karia is a Lecturer in the Department of Early Childhood & Special Needs Education (Speech & Language Pathology Program) at Kenyatta University (Nairobi, Kenya). He teaches in the area of Speech and Language Pathology. He is also a consultant in the field of Speech and Language Pathology. His research interests are in the area of Speech and Language Pathology, Hearing Impairment, Inclusive Education, Neurolinguistics, Phonetics, and Phonology. He is also working in various Kenyan hospitals as a consultant speech therapist and a volunteer speech therapist with Operation Smile Inc., a USA-based NGO and Starkey Hearing Foundation. Dr. Karia holds a Doctor of Philosophy (Phonetics/Speech & Language Pathology) from Cologne University (Germany), M.A (Linguistics/ Phonology) from Kenyatta University (Kenya), and B.Ed (Arts- English/Literature) from Kenyatta University.

Referințe

American Bar Association. (2022). I am still me: Aphasia and the search for a voice in the legal process. Retrieved from https://www.americanbar.org/groups/senior_lawyers/resources/voice-of-experience/2010-2022/i-am-still-me-aphasia-search-voice-legal-process/

Aphasia Institute. (2024). Supported conversation for adults with aphasia (SCA™). Retrieved from https://www.aphasia.com/aphasia-library/aphasia-treatments/supported-conversation-for-adults-with-aphasia-sca/

Aphasia Institute. (2022). Communication tools: Communicative access & supported conversation for adults with aphasia (SCA™). Retrieved from https://www.aphasia.ca/communication-tools-communicative-access-sca/

Auclair-Ouellet, N., Tittley, L., & Root, K. (2022). Effect of an intensive comprehensive aphasia program on language and communication in chronic aphasia. Aphasiology 36(11). https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2021.1959016

Calitri, R., Carter, M., Code, C., Lamont, R., Dean, S., & Tarrant, M. (2021). Challenges of recruiting patients into group-based stroke rehabilitation research: Reflections on clinician equipoise within the Singing for People with Aphasia (SPA) pilot trial. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.624952

CliniQuest Research Site. (2023). Navigating clinical trial management in Kenya: Challenges and triumphs. Retrieved from https://cliniquest.org/navigating-clinical-trial-management-in-kenya-challenges-and-triumphs/

Collaboration of Aphasia Trialists. (2022). The collaboration of aphasia trialists. Retrieved from https://www.aphasiatrials.org/

Frontiers in Psychology. (2021). Challenges of recruiting patients into group-based stroke rehabilitation research: Reflections on clinician equipoise within the Singing for People with Aphasia (SPA) pilot trial. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.624952

Judicial Council on Diversity and Inclusion. (2022, February 15). Cultural diversity within the judicial context: Existing court resources. Retrieved from https://jcdi.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/JCCD_Cultural_Diversity_Within_the_Judicial_Context_-_Existing_Court_Resources.pdf

National Aphasia Association. (2024). Connecting with an advocate. Retrieved from https://aphasia.org/stories/connecting-with-an-advocate/

Sherratt, S. (2022). Court access for people with aphasia: A review of case law from 1915 to 2021. Communication Research 7(6). https://doi.org/10.1044/2022_PERSP-21-00294

SpeechPathology.com. (2023). The intersection of the legal system and people with aphasia and other cognitive-communication impairments. Retrieved from https://www.speechpathology.com/slp-ceus/course/intersection-legal-system-and-people-90

United Nations. (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). United Nations. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convoptprot-e.pdf

Wilson, S. M., Entrup, J. L., Schneck, S. M., Onuscheck, C. F., Levy, D. F., Rahman, M., ... & Kirshner, H. S. (2023). Recovery from aphasia in the first year after stroke. Brain, 146(3), 1021-1039. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awac129

World Health Organization. (2021). Global report on health equity for persons with disabilities. Geneva: World Health Organization. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/teams/noncommunicable-diseases/sensory-functions-disability-and-rehabilitation/global-report-on-health-equity-for-persons-with-disabilities

Yin, R. K. (2022). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (7th ed.). SAGE Publications. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Case_Study_Research_and_Applications.html?hl=it&id=6DwmDwAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y

Descărcări

Publicat

2026-07-30

Număr

Volum 12 Nr. 5 (2026)

Secțiune

Articles

Licență

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

 

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

 

  1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

 

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).