INVESTIGATING THE BARRIERS TO USING ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN GREEK SPECIAL EDUCATION CLASSROOMS: EFL TEACHERS’ PERSPECTIVES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejse.v10i1.5151Nøgleord:
special education, assistive technology, English as a Foreign Language, barriers, teachers’ perceptionsResumé
Empirical findings from different special education contexts worldwide suggest that special education teachers use technologies less than their general education counterparts. The reasons however special educators utilize technology less, remain blurred. This qualitative interview-based study aims to fill this gap and investigate why EFL teachers tend to avoid or neglect assistive technologies in state special education schools in Greece. Thematic analysis was employed to explore the teacher, school, and student-related barriers based on the perceptions of six EFL teachers in special education settings. Findings indicate that the lack of resources, training, technology leadership, time, EFL teachers’ emotional struggles and marginalization as well as students’ poor digital skills and disadvantaged backgrounds constitute the main barriers to using technology in special education classrooms. Additionally, data analysis revealed that EFL teachers are fully aware of the value of using assistive technologies for learning and teaching. The article concludes by putting forward several macro and micro-level recommendations for facilitating assistive technology use in special education schools in Greece.
Article visualizations:
Referencer
Al-Dababneh, K. A., & Al-Zboon, E. K. (2022). Using assistive technologies in the curriculum of children with specific learning disabilities served in inclusion settings: teachers’ beliefs and professionalism. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 17(1), 23-33.
Aldabas, R. (2021). Barriers and facilitators of using augmentative and alternative communication with students with multiple disabilities in inclusive education: Special education teachers’ perspectives. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 25(9), 1010-1026.
Anderson, S. E., & Putman, R. S. (2020). Special education teachers’ experience, confidence, beliefs, and knowledge about integrating technology. Journal of Special Education Technology, 35(1), 37-50.
Arpacık, Ö., Kurşun, E., & Göktaş, Y. (2023). Design considerations of interactive multimedia learning materials for students with special needs. Study of cases. Education and Information Technologies, 1-25.
Atanga, C., Jones, B. A., Krueger, L. E., & Lu, S. (2020). Teachers of students with learning disabilities: Assistive technology knowledge, perceptions, interests, and barriers. Journal of Special Education Technology, 35(4), 236-248.
Baragash, R. S., Al-Samarraie, H., Alzahrani, A. I., & Alfarraj, O. (2020). Augmented reality in special education: A meta-analysis of single-subject design studies. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 35(3), 382-397.
Blackhurst, A. E. (2005). Perspectives on applications of technology in the field of learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28(2), 175-178.
Brownell, M. T., Jones, N. D., Sohn, H., & Stark, K. (2020). Improving teaching quality for students with disabilities: Establishing a warrant for teacher education practice. Teacher Education and Special Education, 43(1), 28-44.
Buckingham, D. (2015). Defining digital literacy-What do young people need to know about digital media?. Nordic journal of digital literacy, 10, 21-35.
Cacciatore, G. (2018). Video prompting delivered via augmented reality to teach transition-related math skills to adults with intellectual disabilities. Brigham Young University.
Ciampa, K. (2017). Building bridges between technology and content literacy in special education: Lessons learned from special educators’ use of integrated technology and perceived benefits for students. Literacy Research and Instruction, 56(2), 85-113.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
Ghanouni, P., Jarus, T., Zwicker, J. G., & Lucyshyn, J. (2020). The use of technologies among individuals with autism spectrum disorders: Barriers and challenges. Journal of Special Education Technology, 35(4), 286-294.
Kang, Y. S., & Chang, Y. J. (2019). Sharing the voice and experience of our community members with significant disabilities in the development of rehabilitation games. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 32, 1-12.
Kaya-Kasikci, S., Zayim-Kurtay, M., & Kondakci, Y. (2023). The role of leadership in developing a climate of technology integration in public schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 132, 104234.
Keane, T., Boden, M., Chalmers, C., & Williams, M. (2020). Effective principal leadership influencing technology innovation in the classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 25(6), 5321-5338.
Kellems, R. O., Eichelberger, C., Cacciatore, G., Jensen, M., Frazier, B., Simons, K., & Zaru, M. (2020). Using video-based instruction via augmented reality to teach mathematics to middle school students with learning disabilities. Journal of learning disabilities, 53(4), 277-291.
Lamond, B., Mo, S., & Cunningham, T. (2023). Teachers' perceived usefulness of assistive technology in Ontario classrooms. Journal of Enabling Technologies, 17(1), 23-40.
Maor, D., Currie, J., & Drewry, R. (2016). The effectiveness of assistive technologies for children with special needs: A review of research-based studies. Technology and Students with Special Educational Needs, 5-20.
O’Sullivan, K., McGrane, A., Long, S., Marshall, K., & Maclachlan, M. (2023). Using a systems thinking approach to understand teachers’ perceptions and use of assistive technology in the Republic of Ireland. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 18(5), 502-510.
Orosco, M. J., & O’Connor, R. (2014). Culturally responsive instruction for English language learners with learning disabilities. Journal of learning disabilities, 47(6), 515-531.
Seidlhofer, B., (2020). Researching ELF communication: Focus on high-stakes encounters. In ELF Research Methods and Approaches to Data and Analyses. 29-37. Routledge.
Seiradakis, E. V. (2024). Migrant mothers of ASD children with language deficits in Greek kindergarten classrooms: Barriers and facilitators of school involvement through an intersectional lens. In Childhood Developmental Language Disorders: Role of Inclusion, Families, and Professionals (pp. 134-148). IGI Global.
Shaheen, N. L., & Lohnes Watulak, S. (2019). Bringing disability into the discussion: Examining technology accessibility as an equity concern in the field of instructional technology. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 51(2), 187-201.
Siyam, N. (2019). Factors impacting special education teachers’ acceptance and actual use of technology. Education and Information Technologies, 24(3), 2035-2057.
Starks, A. C., & Reich, S. M. (2023). “What about special ed?“: Barriers and enablers for teaching with technology in special education. Computers & Education, 193, 104665.
Tesolin, A., & Tsinakos, A. (2018). Opening real doors: Strategies for using mobile augmented reality to create inclusive distance education for learners with different abilities. In Mobile and ubiquitous learning: An international handbook, 59-80.
Tondeur, J., Van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational technology research and development, 65, 555-575.
Traianou, A. (2023). The intricacies of conditionality: education policy review in Greece 2015–2018. Journal of Education Policy, 38(2), 342-362.
Yılmaz, A., & Söğüt, S. (2022). Language education for social justice: Reproductions or disruptions through technology. Computers & Education, 187, 104535.
Downloads
Publiceret
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


