GAMIFIED, TECHNOLOGY-ENHANCED GEOMETRY AND SYMMETRY INSTRUCTION FOR LEARNERS WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES: A DESIGN-BASED STUDY IN A GREEK SPECIAL SCHOOL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejse.v11i5.6231Parole chiave:
special education, gamification, educational technology, geometry, intellectual disabilityAbstract
Geometry and symmetry are fundamental for navigating the world, yet many students with intellectual disabilities (ID) still struggle to fully understand these concepts. This eight-week, three-cycle design-based study explored whether a low-cost blend of gamification and readily available educational technologies could make these concepts more accessible in a Greek Special Vocational Education Laboratory (special secondary school). Six lower-secondary students with moderate ID (mean age = 14.8 years) co-designed and iteratively refined a toolkit that mixed GeoGebra-AR explorations, tablet mini-games, classroom Kahoot challenges, interactive-whiteboard puzzles, and tactile “mirror-tracing” tasks. Preliminary testing showed limited recognition of basic shapes and almost none of reflective symmetry. By the end of the intervention, median correct answers on a 20-item shape test increased from 8 to 17, while symmetry-awareness scores on a 15-item rubric climbed from 4 to 11. Observational checklists documented a steady rise in on-task engagement—from 2.5 to 3.6 on a four-point scale—echoed by “happy-face” exit tickets in almost nine out of ten sessions. Learners also began spontaneously mapping virtual forms onto classroom artefacts (e.g., “This ball is a sphere”), hinting at transfer from the digital to the physical world. Because this approach was applied in a single classroom with a few students, the results cannot be generalised. Even so, they hint that three elements—quick feedback, friendly competition, and presenting ideas in several formats—can together lift understanding for learners with intellectual disabilities. Working side-by-side with the students to shape each activity also seemed to give them a stronger sense of ownership and prompted them to think about how they learn, a step often missed but crucial for lasting progress. Future studies should focus on applying the same approach in larger groups, play with different game features, and test whether carefully structured practice helps these improvements hold and grow over time.
Article visualizations:
Riferimenti bibliografici
Almeida, C., Kalinowski, M., Uchoa, A., & Feijo, B. (2023). Negative Effects of Gamification in Education Software: Systematic Mapping and Practitioner Perceptions. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2305.08346
Alverson, C. Y., Bell, M., Parra, B., & Wei, L. (2025). Teamwork to Support Students with Disabilities: Challenges, Strategies, and Stages of Group Development Within a Design-Based Research Project. Education Sciences, 15(6), 700. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15060700
Armakolas, S., Robolas, P., Karachalios, I., Anastopoulou, P., & Gomatos, L. (2019). Constructing and implementing an OER regarding sustainability issues in vocational education. Educational Journal of the University of Patras UNESCO Chair. https://doi.org/10.26220/une.3083
Arvanitaki, M., & Zaranis, N. (2020). The use of ICT in teaching geometry in primary school. Education and Information Technologies, 25(6), 5003–5016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10210-7
Bulut, O., Gorgun, G., & Yildirim‐Erbasli, S. N. (2025). The impact of frequency and stakes of formative assessment on student achievement in higher education: A learning analytics study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 41(1), e13087. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.13087
Chrisikou, V. (2011). Διδασκαλία γεωμετρικών εννοιών και δεξιοτήτων σε μαθητές Ειδικών Επαγγελματικών Γυμνασίων: Στόχοι, μέθοδοι, διαφοροποίηση. Retrieved from http://dspace.lib.uom.gr/handle/2159/14485
Dominguez, S., & Svihla, V. (2023). A review of teacher implemented scaffolding in K-12. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), 100613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100613
Donaldson, J. P., Han, A., Yan, S., Lee, S., & Kao, S. (2024). Learning experience network analysis for design-based research. Information and Learning Sciences, 125(1/2), 22–43. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-03-2023-0026
Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2021). From mediated actions to heterogenous coalitions: Four generations of activity-theoretical studies of work and learning. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 28(1), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2020.1806328
Guberman, A., & Smith, K. (2021). Editorial: Expansive Learning in Teacher Education. Frontiers in Education, 6, 696965. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.696965
Karachalios, I. (2024). Utilizing Educational Gaming to Foster Sustainability Awareness in Corporate Settings. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 13(3), 740–744. https://doi.org/10.21275/SR24308032254
Karachalios, I., Kalavrouziotis, I., Plakitsi, K., Hatzinikita, V., Gomatos, L., & Sakellariou, P. (2023). Knowledge & Attitudes of secondary education teachers and students regarding waste management in Greece. 12–13. Patras: Unpublished. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.28733.23521
Karachalios, I., & Manesis, N. (2025). Fostering environmental awareness in primary school students: Evaluating the impact of a waste management education program. European Journal of Education Studies, 12(4). http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v12i4.5886
Karachalios, I., Plakitsi, K., Hatzinikita, V., Kalavrouziotis, I., Gomatos, L., & Sakellariou, P. (2023). Secondary education teachers’ views on issues related to wastewater and solid waste management. European Journal of Education Studies, 10(9). https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v10i9.4963
Karachalios, I., & Tantaroudas, N. (2025). Future Greek Pre-Service Teachers’ Knowledge, Attitudes and Self-Efficacy in Waste Management. British Journal of Education, 13(8), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.37745/bje.2013/vol13n82542
Kiili, C., Kiili, K., Räikkönen, E., & Coiro, J. (2025). Explicit video-based instruction enhanced students’ online credibility evaluation skills: Did storifying instruction matter? Computers & Education, 229, 105252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105252
Komatsu, K., Shinno, Y., Stylianides, A. J., & Stylianides, G. J. (2025). Development of local theories in design-based research in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-025-10398-w
Li, M., Ma, S., & Shi, Y. (2023). Examining the effectiveness of gamification as a tool promoting teaching and learning in educational settings: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1253549. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1253549
Navas-Bonilla, C. D. R., Guerra-Arango, J. A., Oviedo-Guado, D. A., & Murillo-Noriega, D. E. (2025). Inclusive education through technology: A systematic review of types, tools and characteristics. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1527851. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1527851
Polydoros, G., & Antoniou, A.-S. (2025). Empowering Students with Learning Disabilities: Examining Serious Digital Games’ Potential for Performance and Motivation in Math Education. Behavioral Sciences, 15(3), 282. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15030282
Powell, S., Barnes, M., Root, J., Hughes, E., Ketterlin-Geller, L., Nelson, G., … Peltier, C. (2025). The NCTM/CEC Position Statement on Teaching Mathematics to Students with Disabilities: What’s in It and What’s Not [Application/pdf,application/xml]. 2(0). https://doi.org/10.25894/RISE.2796
Sailer, M., & Homner, L. (2020). The Gamification of Learning: A Meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32(1), 77–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09498-w
Sunzuma, G. (2023). Technology integration in geometry teaching and learning: A systematic review (2010–2022). LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.11.3.1938
Yani, M., & Rosma, F. (2020). Improving Students’ Spatial Ability by Using Macromedia Flash on Geometry Materials. Malikussaleh Journal of Mathematics Learning (MJML), 3(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.29103/mjml.v3i1.2401
Dowloads
Pubblicato
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
