THE IMPACT OF SEROPOSITIVITY AND AGE ON LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP DURATION IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejprs.v6i1.262Keywords:
rheumatoid arthritis, seropositivity, rheumatoid factor, anti-CCP, follow-up duration, biomarkersAbstract
Background and objectives: To investigate the predictive effects of demographic factors, acute phase reactants (ESR and CRP), serological markers (RF and Anti-CCP), and early biologic treatment strategies at diagnosis on the long-term follow-up duration at a tertiary referral center, from a ten-year perspective (2014-2024). Materials and Methods: This single-center, retrospective cohort study included 140 adult RA patients fulfilling the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria. Baseline clinical characteristics, inflammatory, and autoimmune profiles of the patients were evaluated. The primary endpoint, long-term follow-up duration (months), was calculated based on the patients' first and last registry dates at the rheumatology outpatient clinic. The obtained data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, parametric/non-parametric comparison tests, and correlation analyses. Results: The study cohort, with a mean age of 63.18 ± 15.30 years, consisted of 66.4% female patients. Statistical analyses demonstrated that the mean follow-up duration of patients in the <65 age group (36.24 ± 42.37 months) was significantly longer compared to the ≥65 geriatric group (21.69 ± 30.82 months) (p = 0.023). Gender, geographical residence, and the use of biologic agents in the first year did not exert a significant impact on the follow-up duration. No statistical correlation was observed between baseline acute phase reactants (ESR and CRP levels) and cumulative follow-up duration. Conversely, the baseline serological profile was identified as a dramatic predictor of the follow-up period. The follow-up duration was profoundly longer in Rheumatoid Factor (RF) positive patients compared to negative ones (45.90 months vs. 10.07 months; p < 0.001) and in Anti-CCP positive patients compared to negative ones (37.12 months vs. 22.67 months; p = 0.024). While the follow-up duration remained limited to an average of 8.59 months in patients negative for both autoantibodies, this duration increased to 43.02 months in patients positive for at least one autoantibody (composite seropositivity) (p < 0.001). Conclusion: In RA patients, the fundamental factor determining the need for long-term follow-up in a specialized rheumatology unit is the underlying autoimmune and serological phenotype of the disease, rather than the initial transient acute inflammatory burden. Seropositivity (RF and/or Anti-CCP) is a robust prognostic biomarker that guides clinical practice in identifying aggressive disease forms that require high-risk and persistent specialized care in long-term disease management.References
Díaz-González F, Hernández-Hernández MV. Rheumatoid arthritis. Med Clin (Barc). 2023 Dec 22;161(12):533–42. doi:10.1016/j.medcli.2023.07.014
Conforti A, Di Cola I, Pavlych V, Ruscitti P, Berardicurti O, Ursini F, et al. Beyond the joints, the extra-articular manifestations in rheumatoid arthritis. Autoimmun Rev. 2021 Feb;20(2):102735. doi:10.1016/j.autrev.2020.102735
Smolen JS, Edwards CJ, Konzett V, Laskou F, Aletaha D, Caporali R, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2025 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2026 Jun;85(6):991–1009. doi:10.1016/j.ard.2026.01.023
Krams T, Ruyssen-Witrand A, Nigon D, Degboe Y, Tobon G, Fautrel B, et al. Effect of age at rheumatoid arthritis onset on clinical, radiographic, and functional outcomes: The ESPOIR cohort. Joint Bone Spine. 2016 Oct;83(5):511–5. doi:10.1016/j.jbspin.2015.09.010
Catrina AI, Svensson CI, Malmström V, Schett G, Klareskog L. Mechanisms leading from systemic autoimmunity to joint-specific disease in rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2017 Feb;13(2):79–86. doi:10.1038/nrrheum.2016.200
van der Helm-van Mil AHM, Verpoort KN, Breedveld FC, Toes REM, Huizinga TWJ. Antibodies to citrullinated proteins and differences in clinical progression of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2005;7(5):R949-958. doi:10.1186/ar1767
Takeuchi T, Miyasaka N, Inui T, Yano T, Yoshinari T, Abe T, et al. High titers of both rheumatoid factor and anti-CCP antibodies at baseline in patients with rheumatoid arthritis are associated with increased circulating baseline TNF level, low drug levels, and reduced clinical responses: a post hoc analysis of the RISING study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2017 Sep 2;19(1):194. doi:10.1186/s13075-017-1401-2
Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, Funovits J, Felson DT, Bingham CO, et al. 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Sep;69(9):1580–8. doi:10.1136/ard.2010.138461
Meyer O, Labarre C, Dougados M, Goupille P, Cantagrel A, Dubois A, et al. Anticitrullinated protein/peptide antibody assays in early rheumatoid arthritis for predicting five year radiographic damage. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003 Feb;62(2):120–6. doi:10.1136/ard.62.2.120
Forslind K, Ahlmén M, Eberhardt K, Hafström I, Svensson B, BARFOT Study Group. Prediction of radiological outcome in early rheumatoid arthritis in clinical practice: role of antibodies to citrullinated peptides (anti-CCP). Ann Rheum Dis. 2004 Sep;63(9):1090–5. doi:10.1136/ard.2003.014233
Kroot EJ, de Jong BA, van Leeuwen MA, Swinkels H, van den Hoogen FH, van’t Hof M, et al. The prognostic value of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody in patients with recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2000 Aug;43(8):1831–5. doi:10.1002/1529-0131(200008)43:8<1831::AID-ANR19>3.0.CO;2-6
Schett G, Gravallese E. Bone erosion in rheumatoid arthritis: mechanisms, diagnosis and treatment. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2012 Nov;8(11):656–64. doi:10.1038/nrrheum.2012.153
Gottenberg JE, Courvoisier DS, Hernandez MV, Iannone F, Lie E, Canhão H, et al. Brief Report: Association of Rheumatoid Factor and Anti-Citrullinated Protein Antibody Positivity With Better Effectiveness of Abatacept: Results From the Pan-European Registry Analysis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Jun;68(6):1346–52. doi:10.1002/art.39595
McInnes IB, Schett G. The pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2011 Dec 8;365(23):2205–19. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1004965
Brandt LLN, Schulze-Koops H, Hügle T, Nissen MJ, Kempis J von, Müeller RB. Radiographic Progression in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in Clinical Remission or Low Disease Activity: Results from a Swiss National Registry (SCQM). J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 5;13(23):7424. doi:10.3390/jcm13237424
Saptarini NM, Wibowo MS, Gusdinar T. Correlation Study of Age, Disease Duration, And Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate among The Indonesian Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2015 Nov 1;274–7.
Innala L, Berglin E, Möller B, Ljung L, Smedby T, Södergren A, et al. Age at onset determines severity and choice of treatment in early rheumatoid arthritis: a prospective study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2014 Apr 14;16(2):R94. doi:10.1186/ar4540
Bechman K, Oke A, Yates M, Norton S, Dennison E, Cope AP, et al. Is background methotrexate advantageous in extending TNF inhibitor drug survival in elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis? An analysis of the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register. Rheumatology. 2020 Sep 1;59(9):2563–71. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kez671
Neycheva S, Naseva E, Batalov Z, Karalilova R, Batalov A. First multi-center retrospective study assessed the compliance with and persistence of biological therapies in Bulgarian population with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Int. 2023 Dec;43(12):2233–43. doi:10.1007/s00296-023-05458-4
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


