THE ROLE OF SOCIAL NETWORKS IN DEVELOPING THE PRAGMATIC COMPETENCE OF ENGLISH STUDENTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejals.v5i2.375Keywords:
pragmatic competence, social networks, English students, strategiesAbstract
This study aims to investigate the access and use of social networks by students majoring in English Studies with a high-quality program in developing pragmatic competence. The quantitative research was carried out at Can Tho University (CTU), one of the most prestigious universities in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. The participants were 90 English-majored students of the Department of English Studies (courses 44 to 47) who studied Pragmatics. The questionnaire was used to measure students' use of social networks during class and self-study of students majoring in the English Language – a high-quality program for developing pragmatic competence. The findings showed that most participants use social networks to improve and develop their pragmatic abilities. The most commonly used social networks for improving pragmatics were Facebook and Youtube. They also pointed out that the most common pragmatics knowledge on social networks was about conversational implication, speech acts, and politeness. The results of this study were suggested to help English language students understand the context of utterances, convey exactly what they want to say to their listeners, and overcome the barrier of ambiguity based on the manner, position, and time of utterance.
References
Akay, O., Kalashnikova, A., Kalashnikov, I., & Golubeva, A. (2017, November). Pragmatic level of language personality in social networks. In 7th International Scientific and Practical Conference" Current issues of linguistics and didactics: The interdisciplinary approach in humanities"(CILDIAH 2017) (pp. 9-14). Atlantis Press.
Azad, M., Alipour, M., & Talebi, P. (2018). The effect of using networks on developing EFL learners’ pragmatic competence through speaking accuracy and fluency. Language Education Studies, 4 (4), 15-24. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1reod5zj2kZXScXh4hZc0eiQZ_4dvEM6E/view?usp=drivesdk
Bailey, D. R., & Almusharraf, N. M. (2021). Facebook in class: The instructor’s influence on engagement and language play in online social media forums. Computer Assisted Language Learning–Electronic Journal, 22(3), 66-85.
Barkhuus, L., & Tashiro, J. (2010). Student socialization in the age of Facebook. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 133-142.
Barsky, E., & Purdon, M. (2006). Introducing Web 2.0: Social Networking and Social Bookmarking for Health Librarians. Journal of Canadian Health Library Association, 27(3), 65–67.
Blake, R. (1998). The role of technology in second language learning. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Learning foreign and second languages: Perspectives in research and scholarship (pp. 209-237). New York: Modern Language Association.
Bohn, M., & Frank, M. C. (2019). The pervasive role of pragmatics in early language. Annual Review of Developmental Psychology, 1, 223-249.
Boroughs, B. (2010). Social networking websites and voter turnout. (Unpublished doctorial dissertation), Georgetown University, Georgetown, DC, USA.
Boyd, D., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, /3(1), article 11. Retrieved October 9, 2008, from http://jemc.indiana.edu/vol13/issuel/boyd.ellison.html.
Chen, Y. J., & Yang, S. C. (2007). Technology-enhanced language learning: A case study. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 860–879.
Crandall, E., & Basturkmen, H. (2004). Evaluating pragmatics-focused materials. ELT Journal, 58(1), 38-49.
Crystal, David (1985). A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell, 240. Print
Đào Xuân Phương Trang, Nguyễn Minh Trí (2021). Ứng dụng mạng xã hội trong đánh giá việc học ngoại ngữ https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348304629_USING_SOCIAL_NETWORKING_AS_AN_ASSESSMENT_TOOL_IN_EFL_CLASSROOM
Friedman, T. L. (2009). The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century. Distributed by Paw Prints/Baker & Taylor.
Godwin-Jones, R. (2008). Mobile computing technologies: Lighter, faster, smarter. Language Learning & Technology, 12(3), 3−9.
Hoffman, E. S. (2009). Evaluating social networking tools for distance learning. Proceedings of the 2009 Technology, Colleges, and Community (TOC) Conference. Retrieved from http://etec.hawaii.edu/proceedings/2009/hoffman.pdf
Ishihara, N., & Cohen, A. D. (2014). Teaching and learning pragmatics: Where language and culture meet. Routledge.
Jones, B., & Conceicao, S. C. O. (2008, August). Can social networking tools foster informal learning? Paper presented at the 24th Annual conference on distance teaching and learning, Madison, WI.
Jones, J. G., & Bronack, S. C. (2008). Rethinking cognition, representations, and processes in 3D online social learning environments. In Digital Literacy: Tools and methodologies for information society (pp. 176-205). IGI Global
Kabilan, M. K., Ahmad, N. Abidin, M. J. (2010). Facebook: An online environment for learning of English in institutions of higher education? The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.07.003
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business horizons, 53(1), 59-68.
Khasanah, Y. U. (2019). A Pragmatic Analysis of Efl Learners’ Social Media Interaction. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning (JETLE), 1(1), 2
Lê Thị Tuyết Hạnh, Nguyễn Lê Hoài Thu (2019). https://text.123docz.net/document/9136983-quan-niem-ve-day-hoc-tieng-anh-hieu-qua-cua-sinh-vien-truong-dai-hoc-vinh.htm.
Leech, G. N. (1989). Principles of Pragmatics. Longman Group Limited. New York.
Levinson S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Lyth, A. (2008). Monkseaton primary complete MFL language course [ Field trial ] Unpublished field study, Centre for Evaluation and Monitoring, Durham University England.
Marcus, A., & Krishnamurthi, N. (2009). Cross-cultural analysis of social network services in Japan, Korea, and the USA. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02767-3_7
Morris, C. (1938). Foundations of the theory of signs. Chicago: Oxford University Press.
Nguyễn Thị Tâm (2006): http://enews.agu.edu.vn/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1879&Itemid=117
Ruggeri, F. (2018). The Use of Social Networks for the Development of Socio-Pragmatic Competence in Italian as a Foreign Language. Round Table-Social Net (work) s in Education and Language Sciences. Heidelberg.
Ryan, J. A. (2008). The Virtual Campfire: An Ethnography of Online Social Networking. Wesleyan University.
Skyrms, B., (1984). Pragmatics and Empiricism. Yale University Press. New Heaven, Connecticut, 1st edition.
Sturgeon, C. M., & Walker, C. (2009). Faculty on Facebook: Confirm or deny?. Paper Presented at the Annual Instructional. Technology Conference. Murfreesboro, TN.
Taylor-Smith, E. & Lindner, R. (2009). Social networking tools supporting constructive involvement throughout the policy-cycle. In: Prosser, A.; Parycek, P. (eds.): EDEM 2010 - Conference on Electronic Democracy 2010.
Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 91-112.
Tú Anh (Theo FluentU, Cambridge English)(2020). https://vnexpress.net/hoc-tieng-anh-qua-mang-xa-hoi-4053937.html.
Vasquez, C., & Sharpless, D. (2009). The role of pragmatics in the master's TESOL curriculum: Findings from a nationwide survey. Tesol Quarterly, 43(1), 5-28.
Verschueren J. (1999). Understanding pragmatics. Arnold, London
Wang, Q., Chen, W. and Liang, Y. (2011). The Effects of Social Media on College Students. Johnson & Wales University, Providence, RI.
Ybarra, R., & Green, T. (2003). Using technology to help ESL/EFL students develop language skills. The Internet TESL Journal, 9(3), 1-5.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


