INVESTIGATING PRAGMATIC TRAPS IN ADVERTISING MESSAGES OF ZAIN – IRAQ TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY

Authors

  • Basim Jubair Kadhim PhD, The Open Educational College, Al-Najaf Al-Ashraf, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejals.v6i1.423

Keywords:

pragmatic traps, coded implicature, discourse of advertising, discourse of marketing

Abstract

This paper discusses the use of pragmatic traps in advertising messages and their impact on customers, with a particular focus on the messages of Zain Telecommunication Company in Iraq. Pragmatic traps are false or misleading claims in advertising that deceive customers by distorting the reality of the product or service being offered. The research aims to investigate the extent to which Zain uses pragmatic traps in its advertisements and how these traps affect customers. The analysis of fifty advertising messages from Zain reveals a high use of persuasive language, emotional appeals, particularized and coded implicature, and violations of the maxims of quantity and quality of the cooperative principle. These findings highlight the importance of understanding the elective model of pragmatic traps in advertising and the ways in which advertisers can use language to manipulate the context and meaning of a message. As customers, it is important to be aware of these traps to make informed purchasing decisions.

 

Author Biography

  • Basim Jubair Kadhim, PhD, The Open Educational College, Al-Najaf Al-Ashraf, Iraq

    Basim Jubair Kadhim, holds a PhD & M.A. in English Language & Linguistics (Applied Pragmatics) from Babylon University, and currently, a Teaching Staff member in Open Educational College, Department of English, Iraq. Google Scholar

References

Bach, Robert. (2005). 'The Top 10 Misconceptions about Implicature'. John Benjamins.

Belk, R. W. (2013). Extended self in a digital world. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(3), 477-500.

Chen, X. (2017). Critical Pragmatic Studies on Chinese Public Discourse. Springer.

Cook, G. (2001). The discourse of advertising. Psychology Press.

Crocker, J. (2008). The role of the self in shaping beliefs and attitudes: Some implications for persuasion and attitude change. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(5), 1751-1768.

Cruse, A. (2006). A glossary of Semantics and Pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Grice, H. P. (1991). Studies in the Way of Words. London: Harvard University Press.

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In: P. Cole and J.L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, 41-58. New York: Academic Press.

Grundy, P. (2000). Doing Pragmatics. London. Hodder Headline: Group. 2nd ed.

Jubair, B. & Al-Hindawi, F. H. (2016). Irony in Electoral Political Speeches: A Pragmatic Model of Effective Strategies. Lambert Academic Publishing: Germany.

Jubair, B. K. (2023). International Education Studies and Sustainability. Toward a Comprehensive Model of the Pragmatization of Lexical Uniqueness with Reference to Iraqi Arabic. Vol. 3, No. 1, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22158/iess.v3n1p1

Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (2010). Principles of marketing. Pearson Education.

Kunz, W. (2009). Pragmatic traps in advertisements. Marketing and Semiotics, 2, 45-59.

Mick, D. G., & Fournier, S. (1998). Paradoxes of technology: Consumer cognizance, emotions, and coping strategies. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(2), 123-143.

Obermiller, C., & Spangenberg, E. R. (1998). Development of a scale to measure consumer skepticism toward advertising. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7(2), 159-186.

Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123-205.

Sassatelli, R. (2010). Consumer culture: history, theory and politics. Sage.

Szmigin, I., & Carrigan, M. (2006). The ethical consumer. Sage.

Tseng, Y. (2018). The impact of pragmatic traps on consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 872-880.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-19

Issue

Section

Articles