VIETNAMESE EFL INSTRUCTORS’ PERCEPTIONS OF CASE-BASED LEARNING IN A COMMUNICATION COURSE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejals.v6i1.429Keywords:
case-based learning, critical thinking, communication course, EFL studentsAbstract
This article presents a qualitative research study that aims to evaluate the use of the case-based learning (CBL) method in an English communication course at a Vietnamese university from the perspective of instructors. The study collected data from three instructors who tried the CBL method in a communication course. The findings show that the instructors perceived CBL as an effective pedagogical method that enhances involvement, critical thinking, problem-solving, and communication skills among students. The instructors also reported that CBL contributed to the development of the students' confidence and motivation in communicating with others in English as well as their intercultural competence. However, the study highlights several challenges in using this method, including the amount of time and effort required to create appropriate scenarios, potential limitations in students' language proficiency, and the need for ongoing support for instructors to facilitate this method effectively. The study suggests that CBL is an effective approach to teaching English communication courses and recommends further support and resources for instructors to implement this approach successfully.
References
Beck, J. (2007). An exploration of the relationship between case study methodology and learning style preference. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(3), 423–430.
Carlson, J. & Schodt, D. (1995) Economic instruction beyond the lecture: Case teaching and learning of economic theory. Journal of Economic Education, 26(1), 17–29.
Doran, J., Healy, M., McCutcheon, M., & O'Callaghan, S. (2011). Adapting case-based teaching to large class settings: An action research approach. Accounting Education, 20(3), 245-263.
Erskine, J., Leenders, M., & Mauffette-Leenders, L. (1998). Teaching with cases. London/Ont., Canada: Richard Ivey School of Business/The University of Western Ontario.
Esteban, A. A., Canado, M. J. P. (2004). Making the case method work in teaching Business English: A case study. English for Specific Purposes, 23(2), 137–161.
Harrington, H. L. & Garrison, J. W. (1992). Cases as shared inquiry: A dialogical model of teacher preparation. American Educational Research Journal, 29(4), 715–735.
Heitzmann, R. (2008). Case study instruction in teacher education: Opportunity to develop students' critical thinking, school smarts and decision making. Education, 128(4), 523-542
Hemphill, M. A., R Richards, K. A., Gaudreault, K. L., & Templin, T. J. (2015). Pre-service teacher perspectives of case-based learning in physical education teacher education. European Physical Education Review, 21(4), 432–450. doi:10.1177/1356336x15579402
Jackson, J. (2004). Case-based teaching in a bilingual context: Perceptions of business faculty in Hong Kong. English for Specific Purposes, 23(3), 213-232.
Jennings, D. (1996). Strategic management and the case method. Journal of Management Development, 15(9), 4–12.
Jiménez Raya, M. & Vieira, F. (2015). Enhancing autonomy in language education: A case-based approach to teacher and learner development. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kelch, K. & Malupa-Kim, M. (2014). Implementing case studies in language teacher education and professional development. ORTESOL Journal, 31, 10-18.
Kleinfeld, J. (1992) Learning to talk like a teacher. In: Shulman JH (ed.) Case Methods in Teacher Education (pp.33–49). New York: Teachers College Press.
Lee, S.-H., Lee, J., Liu, X., Bonk, C. J., & Magjuka, R. J. (2009). A review of case-based learning practices in an online MBA program: A program-level case study. Educational Technology & Society, 12 (3), 178–190.
Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. New York: Sage.
Marcus, G., Taylor, R., & Ellis, R. A. (2004). Implications for the design of online case based learning activities based on the student blended learning experience. In R. Atkinson, C. McBeath, D. Jonas-Dwyer, & R. Phillips (Eds.), Beyond the comfort zone: Proceedings of the 21st ASCILITE Conference (pp. 557–586). Perth, Western Australia.
Merseth, K. K. (1999). A rationale for case-based pedagogy in teacher education [foreword]. In M. A. Lundeberg, B. B. Levin, & H. L. Harrington (Eds.), Who learns what from cases and how? The research base for teaching and learning with cases (pp. ix- xv). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Newson, T. A., & Delatte, N. J. (2011). Case methods in civil engineering teaching. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 38, 1016-1030.
Richards, A. K., Hemphill, M. A., Templin, T. J., & Eubank, A. M. (2012). Student-authored case studies as a learning tool in physical education teacher education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 47-52.
Rovegno, I. & Dolly, J. (2006) Constructivist perspectives on learning. In: Kirk D, Macdonald D and O’Sullivan M (eds) The Handbook of Physical Education (pp.242–261). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Snyder, P., & McWilliam, P. J. (1999). Evaluating the efficacy of case method instruction findings from preservice training in family-centered care. Journal of Early Intervention, 22(2), 114-125.
Veal, M. L. & Taylor, M. (1995) A case for teaching about assessment. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance 66(1), 54–59.
Williams, M. (2004). Exploring the effects of a multimedia case-based learning environment in pre-service science teacher education in Jamaica. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Twente, The Netherlands.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


