THE DYNAMIC INTERPLAY OF PHONOLOGY AND SEMANTICS IN MEDIA AND COMMUNICATION: AN INTERDISCIPLINARY EXPLORATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejals.v6i2.479Keywords:
phonology, media, effective communication, semanticsAbstract
Phonology, semantics, and pragmatics are the three aspects of language fundamental to know how language works and how people process and use it. By examining the interaction between the memory hypothesis and linguistics in speech and semantic organization, this study seeks to better understand how individuals use language to express themselves. This study delves into finding out the association between phonology and semantics by developing a multi-faceted correspondence organization and applying ideas from computer network science and chart hypothesis. A correspondence framework of the International Phonetic Alphabet and semantic network examination in R was used to investigate the information once obtained through a web-based information gathering drive. As per the discoveries, the dynamic and ensnared association between phonology and semantics affects the correspondence that happens in the media. The aftereffects of this study offer new points of view on the idea of language and the job it plays in human communication. Understanding how semantics and phonics interact in different situations is essential for modern communication, this study is an effort to analyze the relation between words' meanings and sounds. By studying words usage in different mediums, we want to learn how these important elements affect platform interactions. Thus, the present study explains how semantics and phonology shape media and how this link can improve communication. The review suggests a multi-faceted framework that divides the linguistic framework into various layers with different hub relationships. This advanced four-layer contact network is designed to identify and analyze language confusion with precision and accuracy. It incorporates free associations, word associations, and three semantic layers to measure articulation, semantics, punctuation, and jargon. Using a comprehensive inside-and-out technique, this evaluation examines phonology and semantics through multi-faceted network analysis, allowing for effective assessment of language understanding and improvement.
References
Alamri, A. (2017). Phonological, Semantic and Root Activation in Spoken Word Recognition in Arabic: Evidence from Eye Movements (Doctoral dissertation, Université d'Ottawa/University of Ottawa). https://ruor.uottawa.ca/handle/10393/36053
Alamri, A. A., & Zamuner, T. S. (2015). Phonological, semantic, and root activation in spoken word recognition in Arabic: An eye-tracking study. In Proceedings of the annual conference of the Canadian Linguistics Association (pp. 1–15).
Avila Varela, D. S. (2022). Phonological and Semantic Overlap Between Words: Effects on Recognition of Familiar and Recently Acquired Words in Early Childhood. https://ediss.uni-goettingen.de/handle/11858/13990
Diaz, M. T., Johnson, M. A., Burke, D. M., Truong, T. K., & Madden, D. J. (2017). Age-related differences in the influence of task-irrelevant information on the neural bases of phonological and semantic processes. bioRxiv, 136606. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/136606v1.abstract
Dickens, J. V., Fama, M. E., DeMarco, A. T., Lacey, E. H., Friedman, R. B., & Turkeltaub, P. E. (2019). Localization of phonological and semantic contributions to reading. Journal of Neuroscience, 39(27), 5361-5368. https://www.jneurosci.org/content/39/27/5361.abstract
Edler, D., Bohlin, L., & Rosvall, M. (2017). Mapping higher-order network flows in memory and multilayer networks with infomap. Algorithms, 10(4), 112. https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4893/10/4/112
Elsisy, A., Mandviwalla, A., Szymanski, B. K., & Sharkey, T. (2022). A network generator for covert network structures. Information Sciences, pp. 584, 387–398. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020025521010884
Enarvi, S., Smit, P., Virpioja, S., & Kurimo, M. (2017). Automatic speech recognition with extensive conversational Finnish and Estonian vocabularies. IEEE/ACM Transactions on audio, speech, and language processing, 25(11), 2085-2097. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8015196
Fawcett, J. M., Bodner, G. E., Paulewicz, B., Rose, J., & Wakeham-Lewis, R. (2022). Production can enhance semantic encoding: Evidence from forced-choice recognition with homophone versus synonym lures. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29(6), 2256-2263. https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13423-022-02140-x
Fourtassi, A., Bian, Y., & Frank, M. C. (2020). The growth of children's semantic and phonological networks: Insight from 10 languages. Cognitive Science, 44(7), e12847. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/cogs.12847
Gafni, C., & Tsur, R. (2021). Studying emotive effects in poetry by quantifying open-ended impressions. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 39(2), 216-242. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0276237420984718
Ha, H., Han, H., Mun, S., Bae, S., Lee, J., & Lee, K. (2019). An improved multilevel semantic network visualization study for analyzing sentiment words of movie review data. Applied Sciences, 9(12), 2419. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/9/12/2419
Han, G., Liu, L., Zhang, W., & Chan, S. (2018). A hierarchical jammed-area mapping service for ubiquitous communication in smart communities. IEEE Communications Magazine, 56(1), 92–98. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8255745
Kent, C., & Rafaeli, S. (2016, January). How interactive is a semantic network? Concept maps and discourse in knowledge communities. In 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (pp. 2095-2104). IEEE. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7427446
Lei, C. M. (2018). Hemispheric Lateralization for Language Examined with Chinese Characters (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh). http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/33398/
Levy, O., Kenett, Y. N., Oxenberg, O., Castro, N., De Deyne, S., Vitevitch, M. S., & Havlin, S. (2021). Unveiling the nature of the interaction between semantics and phonology in lexical access based on multilayer networks. Scientific reports, 11(1), 14479. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-93925-y
Marini, A., Zettin, M., & Galetto, V. (2014). Cognitive correlates of narrative impairment in moderate traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychologia, 64, 282-288. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0028393214003479
Sandgren, O., Andersson, K., Lyberg Åhlander, V., Rosqvist, I., Hansson, K., & Sahlén, B. (2023). A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of teacher continued professional development on student language outcomes. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 58(3), 879-891. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1460-6984.12829
Sarubbo, S., De Benedictis, A., Merler, S., Mandonnet, E., Barbareschi, M., Dallabona, M., ... & Duffau, H. (2016). Blunt dissection and direct electrical stimulation reveal structural and functional integration between dorsal and ventral language streams. Human brain mapping, 37(11), 3858-3872. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/hbm.23281
Sezer, O. B., Dogdu, E., Ozbayoglu, M., & Onal, A. (2016, December). An extended IoT framework with semantics, big data, and analytics. In 2016 IEEE international conference on big data (big data) (pp. 1849-1856). IEEE. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7840803
Stella, M., Citraro, S., Rossetti, G., Marinazzo, D., Kenett, Y. N., & Vitevitch, M. S. (2022). Cognitive modeling with multilayer networks: Insights, advancements, and future challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.00500. https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.00500
Wild, T., Braun, V., & Viswanathan, H. (2021). Joint design of communication and sensing for beyond 5G and 6G systems. IEEE Access, p. 9, 30845–30857. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9354629
Wu, S., & Ma, Z. (2017). Native-Language Phonological Interference in Early Hakka–Mandarin Bilinguals’ Visual Recognition of Chinese Two-Character Compounds: Evidence from the Semantic-Relatedness Decision Task. Journal of psycholinguistic research, 46, 57-75. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10936-016-9420-8
Zaharchuk, H. A., & Karuza, E. A. (2021). Multilayer networks: An untapped tool for understanding bilingual neurocognition. Brain and Language, 220, 104977. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0093934X21000717
Zemla, J. C., Cao, K., Mueller, K. D., & Austerweil, J. L. (2020). SNAFU: The semantic network and fluency utility. Behavior research methods, 52, 1681-1699. https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13428-019-01343-w
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


