SHAPING NARRATIVES: PRESUPPOSITIONS IN ONLINE NEWS DISCOURSE ON THE SYRIAN CONFLICT

Authors

  • Sayf Mohamed Cergy Paris University, Paris, France

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejals.v8i3.647

Keywords:

presupposition, discourse, media, Syria, ideology

Abstract

As an implicit assumption embedded within language, presupposition plays a critical role in shaping audience perceptions and framing narratives. In this paper, we study the use of presuppositions in online news discourse regarding the Syrian conflict in order to investigate the ideological stance reflected by the presupposed news. By employing a corpus of online news reports posted on France 24, a news website publishing in English, we use a discourse analytic approach to identify the voices expressed, the frequency and distribution of presuppositions and the presupposition triggers, and explain their resulting patterns related to ideological evaluations. The findings indicate that reporters presuppose certain outcomes and interpretations which align with the broader ideological biases. In this paper, we highlight the implicit, yet powerful ways in which news discourse can influence the audience in their coverage of social movements.

 

Author Biography

  • Sayf Mohamed, Cergy Paris University, Paris, France

    Sayf Mohamed  is a lecturer of English linguistics at the University of Cergy Paris in France, University Institute of Technology and affiliated to the AGORA research lab, with a PhD in English Linguistics (University of Lille). He is a former SUSI scholar at the Ohio University, and his research interests lie in discourse analysis, cognitive linguistics, conceptual metaphors and news representation.

    Orcid ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8387-6865

References

Allan, K., & Jaszczolt, K. M. (2012). The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/The_Cambridge_Handbook_of_Pragmatics.html?id=9sH3CwAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y

Capone, A. (2013). The pragmatics of indirect reports: Socio-philosophical Considerations. Springer. Retrieved from https://scholar.google.co.uk/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=RDOIaAEAAAAJ&citation_for_view=RDOIaAEAAAAJ:U0iAMwwPxtsC

Cotter, C. (2010). News Talk: Investigating the Language of Journalism. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811975

Domaneschi, F., Carrea, E., Penco, C., & Greco, A. (2013). The cognitive load of presupposition triggers: mandatory and optional repairs in presupposition failure. Language Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(1), 136–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2013.830185

Domaneschi, F., & Di Paola, S. (2017). The processing costs of presupposition accommodation. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 47(3), 483–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-017-9534-7

Grundy, P. (2013). Doing pragmatics. Routledge. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Doing_Pragmatics.html?id=yK4uAgAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y

International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. (2015). Elsevier. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/referencework/9780080970875/international-encyclopedia-of-the-social-and-behavioral-sciences

Kripke, S. A. (2009). Presupposition and anaphora: remarks on the formulation of the projection problem. Linguistic Inquiry, 40(3), 367–386. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2009.40.3.367

Sauerland, U. (2008). Implicated presuppositions. In De Gruyter eBooks (pp. 581–600). https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110209303.4.581

Simons, M. (2016). Issues in the semantics and pragmatics of disjunction. Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315520339

Stubbs, M. (1996). Text and corpus analysis: Computer-Assisted Studies of Language and Culture. Wiley-Blackwell. Retrieved from https://aclanthology.org/J97-3009.pdf

Van Dijk, T. A. (1995). Discourse Semantics and Ideology. Discourse & Society, 6(2), 243–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926595006002006

Downloads

Published

2025-09-29

Issue

Section

Articles