A CORPUS-BASED INVESTIGATION OF COLLOCATION, SEMANTIC PROSODY, AND SEMANTIC PREFERENCES OF A HIGH-FREQUENCY NOUN VALUE IN BRITISH ACADEMIC WRITTEN ENGLISH (BAWE)

Authors

  • K. M. Jubair Uddin Assistant Professor (English), Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Chittagong, Bangladesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejals.v9i1.679

Keywords:

collocation, semantic prosody, semantic preferences, high-frequency noun value, British Academic Written English (BAWE)

Abstract

This paper examines the collocations, semantic prosody, and semantic preferences of the high-frequency abstract noun value in British Academic Written English (BAWE) using Sketch Engine. The analysis is based on a neo-Firthian corpus-linguistic approach in which the recurring grammatical patterns across disciplines, such as adjectival modifiers, verb-noun constructions, noun compounds, and prepositional structures, are discussed. The results demonstrate that value is largely associated with quantitative and methodological meanings in STEM-based writing, where it expresses mostly neutral semantic prosody. In contrast, in the social sciences, humanities, and business discourse, value is typically evaluative, normative, and strategic and exhibits less systematic prosodic tendencies. The semantic preference analysis uncovers stable associations with domains of measurement, evaluation, ideology, and market orientation, which are reflective of disciplinary epistemologies. By combining collocation, semantic prosody, and semantic preference to analyse a single high-frequency noun, this paper contributes to corpus-based studies of academic discourse and offers a pedagogical implication for teaching discipline-specific academic writing and developing collocational competence. 

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

Author Biography

  • K. M. Jubair Uddin, Assistant Professor (English), Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Chittagong, Bangladesh
    K. M. Jubair Uddin is an Assistant Professor in the Faculty of Biological Sciences at the University of Chittagong, Bangladesh. His research centres on corpus-based approaches to second language acquisition, bilingualism, and language assessment with an emphasis on integrating theory and practice to support multilingual learners. His publications have addressed pronunciation, vocabulary development, second-language acquisition theories, language in literature, corrective feedback, language policy, and language identity. His work provides insights into the teaching and assessment of language across different disciplinary settings.

References

Ackermann, K., & Chen, Y.-H. (2013). Developing the academic collocation list (ACL) – A corpus-driven and expert-judged approach. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(4), 235–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.08.002

Bednarek, M. (2008a). Evaluation in media discourse. Retrieved from https://www.torrossa.com/it/resources/an/5204191

Bednarek, M. (2008b). Semantic preference and semantic prosody re-examined. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 4(2), 119–139. https://doi.org/10.1515/CLLT.2008.006

Begagić, M. (2013). Semantic preference and semantic prosody of the collocation make sense. Jezikoslovlje, 14(2–3), 403–416. https://hrcak.srce.hr/112198

Begagić, M. (2018). Semantic preference and semantic prosody: A theoretical overview. Journal of Education and Humanities (JEH), 1(2), 65–88. Retrieved from https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=773549

Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2016). Grammatical complexity in academic English: Linguistic change in writing. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/grammatical-complexity-in-academic-english/0986B2B0F882B68A7427909C6A8C428D

Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213–238. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587951

Durrant, P., & Schmitt, N. (2009). To what extent do native and non-native writers make use of collocations? International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 47(2), 157–177. Retrieved from https://repository.bilkent.edu.tr/items/835a37e6-b15d-493b-8ccd-67448063c12a

Flowerdew, L. (2012). Corpora and language education. Springer. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/book/10.1057/9780230355569

Gablasova, D., Brezina, V., & McEnery, T. (2017). Collocations in corpus-based language learning research: Identifying, comparing, and interpreting the evidence. Language Learning, 67(S1), 155–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12225

Hoey, M. (2012). Lexical priming: A new theory of words and language. Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9780203327630/lexical-priming-michael-hoey

Hunston, S. (2007). Semantic prosody revisited. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 12(2), 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.12.2.09hun

Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2009). Academic lexis and disciplinary practice: Corpus evidence for specificity. International Journal of English Studies, 9(2), 111–129. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ878445.pdf

Jones, C., & Waller, D. (2015). Corpus linguistics for grammar: A guide for research. Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.routledge.com/Corpus-Linguistics-for-Grammar-A-guide-for-research/Jones-Waller/p/book/9780415746410

Lin, Y.-Y., & Chung, S.-F. (2016). A corpus-based study on the semantic prosody of challenge. Taiwan Journal of TESOL, 13(2), 99–146. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1143821

Louw, B. (1993). Irony in the text or insincerity in the writer? — The diagnostic potential of semantic prosodies. In M. Baker, G. Francis, & E. Tognini-Bonelli (Eds.), Text and technology (pp. 157–176). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.64.11lou

Morley, J., & Partington, A. (2009). A few frequently asked questions about semantic—or evaluative—prosody. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.14.2.01mor

Nesi, H., & Gardner, S. (2018). The BAWE corpus and genre families classification of assessed student writing. Assessing Writing, 38, 51–55. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107529351830045X

Partington, A. (2004). “Utterly content in each other’s company”: Semantic prosody and semantic preference. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9(1), 131–156. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.9.1.07par

Sidupa, C., & Wastono, A. T. (2019). Semantic preference of verb–noun collocation: A corpus-based analysis (pp. 7–11). https://doi.org/10.2991/conaplin-18.2019.216

Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford University Press.

Sinclair, J. (1996). The search for units of meaning. Textus, 9(1), 75–106. Retrieved from https://corpus.bfsu.edu.cn/Sinclair_1996_The_Search_For_Units_Of_Meaning_Textus.pdf

Sketch Engine. (n.d.). Sketch Engine. Lexical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.sketchengine.eu

Smith, K. A., & Nordquist, D. (2012). A critical and historical investigation into semantic prosody. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 13(2), 291–312. https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.13.2.05smi

Stubbs, M. (2001). Words and phrases: Corpus studies of lexical semantics. John Wiley & Sons. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=opa8EAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR11&dq=Stubbs,+M.+(2001).+Words+and+phrases:+Corpus+studies+of+lexical+semantics.+Blackwell.&ots=kSN61xguSg&sig=I6uh_sCqcXMgNj3usZLvvImSJe0

Downloads

Published

2026-02-11

Issue

Section

Articles