CRITICAL LINGUISTIC INQUIRY OF ‘TWILIGHT IN DELHI’ IN THE LIGHT OF BINARY OPPOSITIONS

Authors

  • Wahid Pervez Cadet College Ormara, Balochistan, Pakistan

Keywords:

binary opposition, Delhi’s culture v/s English culture, family constructor v/s destructor, idealist v/s realist, romantic v/s unromantic and bold v/s shy

Abstract

The present paper intends to discuss binary oppositions in the characters of the novel “Twilight in Delhi”. The research focuses on representation of Delhi’s culture v/s English culture, family constructor v/s destructor, idealist v/s realist, romantic v/s unromantic and bold v/s shy. Binary opposition is the basic concept of structuralism, a theory of sociology, anthropology and linguistics. Binary opposition states that all elements of human culture can only be understood in relation to one another and how they function within a larger system or the overall environment. It explores the relationships between different groups of people, for instance: upper-class and lower-class or disabled and non-disabled. In the same fashion, the present study has analyzed the characters of the novel to present their actual status in the light of binary opposition. On the surface, these seem like mere identifying labels, but what makes them binary opposites is the notion that they cannot coexist. Binary opposition in the characters highlights the ways of living, behavior, choice, like and dislike. The study also gives post-colonial touch because the theme of the novel is set in colonial period. English ruled over India and deliberately imposed their culture. The downfall of Delhi’s culture and adoption of English one is also the part of this research.

References

Ali Ahmed, Twilight in Delhi, London, Hogarth Press, 1940.

Barry Peter, Beginning Theory “An introduction to literary theory,” London, 1999.

Abrams, M. H. A Glossary of Literary Terms: Seventh Edition. New York: Heinle & Heinle, 1999.

Arp, Thomas R. and Greg Johnson. Perrine’s Literature: Structure, Sound, and Sense. Boston: Heinle & Heinle, 2006.

Augustten, Ayunda. “Alma Winemiller’s Psychological Conflict as Seen in Tennessee Williams’ Summer and Smoke”. Thesis. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University, 2004.

Barranger, Milly S. Theater, A Way of Seeing. Fourth Edition. New York: Wadsworth, 1994.

Chevalier, Jean and Alain Gheerbrant. Translated by John Buchanan-Brown. The Penguin Dictionary of Symbols. London: Penguin Group, 1996.

Chun An, Guo. “Binary Oppositions in Paradise Lost: A Structuralist Reading Strategy”. Kaohsiung Journal Ninth. Web. September 26, 2014.

Dewi, Utari. “A Study of Character Development of Alma Winemiller and John Buchanan in William’s Summer and Smoke”. Thesis. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University, 2000.

Fogarty, S., “The literary Encyclopedia”. 2005. Web.

Gill, Richard. Mastering English Literature: Second Edition. New York: Palgrave Macmillan Ltd, 1995.

Pryor, Jerome J. “The Discovery of Dionysus in Tennessee Williams’ Summer and Smoke”. Web. September 26, 2014.

Downloads

Published

2018-10-24

Issue

Section

Articles