CRITICAL LINGUISTIC INQUIRY OF ‘TWILIGHT IN DELHI’ IN THE LIGHT OF BINARY OPPOSITIONS
Keywords:
binary opposition, Delhi’s culture v/s English culture, family constructor v/s destructor, idealist v/s realist, romantic v/s unromantic and bold v/s shyAbstract
The present paper intends to discuss binary oppositions in the characters of the novel “Twilight in Delhi”. The research focuses on representation of Delhi’s culture v/s English culture, family constructor v/s destructor, idealist v/s realist, romantic v/s unromantic and bold v/s shy. Binary opposition is the basic concept of structuralism, a theory of sociology, anthropology and linguistics. Binary opposition states that all elements of human culture can only be understood in relation to one another and how they function within a larger system or the overall environment. It explores the relationships between different groups of people, for instance: upper-class and lower-class or disabled and non-disabled. In the same fashion, the present study has analyzed the characters of the novel to present their actual status in the light of binary opposition. On the surface, these seem like mere identifying labels, but what makes them binary opposites is the notion that they cannot coexist. Binary opposition in the characters highlights the ways of living, behavior, choice, like and dislike. The study also gives post-colonial touch because the theme of the novel is set in colonial period. English ruled over India and deliberately imposed their culture. The downfall of Delhi’s culture and adoption of English one is also the part of this research.
References
Ali Ahmed, Twilight in Delhi, London, Hogarth Press, 1940.
Barry Peter, Beginning Theory “An introduction to literary theory,” London, 1999.
Abrams, M. H. A Glossary of Literary Terms: Seventh Edition. New York: Heinle & Heinle, 1999.
Arp, Thomas R. and Greg Johnson. Perrine’s Literature: Structure, Sound, and Sense. Boston: Heinle & Heinle, 2006.
Augustten, Ayunda. “Alma Winemiller’s Psychological Conflict as Seen in Tennessee Williams’ Summer and Smoke”. Thesis. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University, 2004.
Barranger, Milly S. Theater, A Way of Seeing. Fourth Edition. New York: Wadsworth, 1994.
Chevalier, Jean and Alain Gheerbrant. Translated by John Buchanan-Brown. The Penguin Dictionary of Symbols. London: Penguin Group, 1996.
Chun An, Guo. “Binary Oppositions in Paradise Lost: A Structuralist Reading Strategy”. Kaohsiung Journal Ninth. Web. September 26, 2014.
Dewi, Utari. “A Study of Character Development of Alma Winemiller and John Buchanan in William’s Summer and Smoke”. Thesis. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University, 2000.
Fogarty, S., “The literary Encyclopedia”. 2005. Web.
Gill, Richard. Mastering English Literature: Second Edition. New York: Palgrave Macmillan Ltd, 1995.
Pryor, Jerome J. “The Discovery of Dionysus in Tennessee Williams’ Summer and Smoke”. Web. September 26, 2014.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


