DENARRATION AND NARRATIVE PERSISTENCE IN SAMUEL BECKETT’S PROSE AND DRAMA

Authors

  • Mohamed El Kadi École Nationale des Sciences Appliquées d’Al Hoceïma (ENSAH), Abdelmalek Essaâdi University, Morocco

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejals.v9i1.695

Keywords:

Samuel Beckett, denarration, narratology, modernist prose, theatrical performance

Abstract

This article examines Samuel Beckett’s prose and drama through the concept of denarration, understood as a narrational practice that undermines the world it appears to construct. Drawing on Brian Richardson’s theorization of denarration and situating Beckett’s work within a broader modernist and postmodernist context, the article argues that Beckett’s dismantling of narrative does not signal the end of storytelling but rather exposes the minimal and performative conditions under which narrative can persist. This study shows how voice, silence, repetition, and interruption become the basic materials out of which narrative continues to emerge through a close reading of Beckett’s fiction and drama together, ranging from the early novels and poetry, such as The Trilogy, Waiting for Godot, and Krapp’s Last Tape, to the late prose works. The article reconceptualizes denarration not as narrative negation, but as a sustained poetic strategy that enables narrative persistence beyond plot, character, and verisimilitude.

Author Biography

  • Mohamed El Kadi, École Nationale des Sciences Appliquées d’Al Hoceïma (ENSAH), Abdelmalek Essaâdi University, Morocco

    Mohamed El Kadi holds a doctoral degree in English Studies and an MA in Area Studies (Colonial and Postcolonial Studies) from Mohamed First University, Oujda. He is a full-time high school teacher and a part-time instructor at ENSAH (École Normale Supérieure d’Al Hoceima). He is a member of the Space and Culture Research Group. His research interests include ELT, cultural studies, linguistics, and literature.

References

Abbott, H. Porter. 1996. Beckett Writing Beckett: The Author in the Autograph. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Beckett_Writing_Beckett.html?id=URSbDwAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y

Beckett, Samuel. 1994. Murphy. New York: Grove Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Murphy.html?id=_kYrAQAAIAAJ&redir_esc=y

——. 1994. Stories and Texts for Nothing. New York: Grove Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Stories_and_Texts_for_Nothing.html?id=_Vx6HhRVPqoC&redir_esc=y

———. 2006. The Complete Dramatic Works. London: Faber and Faber. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/The_Complete_Dramatic_Works_of_Samuel_Be.html?id=oxoCkQFh_nYC&redir_esc=y

———. 2009. Company, Ill Seen Ill Said, Worstward Ho, Stirring Still. London: Faber and Faber. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Company_Ill_Seen_Ill_Said_Worstward_Ho_S.html?id=Z7Qzw9jYKCoC&redir_esc=y

———. 2009. Watt. London: Faber and Faber.

———. 2010. Molloy. London: Faber and Faber. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Molloy.html?id=oG0T0AEACAAJ&redir_esc=y

———. 2010. Malone Dies. London: Faber and Faber. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Malone_Dies.html?id=lM5AEQAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y

———. 2010. The Unnamable. London: Faber and Faber. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/unnamable0000beck

———. 2011. Dream of Fair to Middling Women. New York: Arcade Publishing. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books?id=zH6IZlnEuYQC&printsec=frontcover&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

———. 2011. Mercier and Camier. New York: Grove Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Mercier_and_Camier.html?id=ymoVG9pvl04C&redir_esc=y

———. 1996. “The Way.” In Nohow On, 123–126. New York: Grove Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Nohow_on.html?id=mFBaAAAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y

Cohn, Dorrit. 1978. Transparent Minds: Narrative Modes for Presenting Consciousness in Fiction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Transparent_Minds.html?id=dmIQoPdb1SgC&redir_esc=y

Connor, Steven. 1988. Samuel Beckett: Repetition, Theory and Text. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/samuelbeckettrep0000conn

Gontarski, S. E. 1985. The Intent of Undoing in Samuel Beckett’s Dramatic Texts. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/The_Intent_of_Undoing_in_Samuel_Beckett.html?id=qBZaAAAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y

Malina, Debra. 2002. Breaking the Frame: Metalepsis and the Construction of the Subject. Columbus: Ohio State University Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.ug/books?id=YS063Jxa0a8C&printsec=copyright#v=onepage&q&f=false

Nabokov, Vladimir. 1989. Pale Fire. New York: Vintage International. Retrieved from https://ia601405.us.archive.org/10/items/HeliganSecretsOfTheLostGardens/NabokovVladimir-PaleFire.pdf

Richardson, Brian. 2001. “Denarration in Fiction: Erasing the Story in Beckett and Others.” Narrative 9 (2): 168–175. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/20107243

Van Hulle, Dirk. 2009. Joyce’s Know-How, Beckett’s No-How. Gainesville: University Press of Florida. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Manuscript_Genetics_Joyce_s_Know_how_Bec.html?id=3oiKtAEACAAJ&redir_esc=y

———. 2015. The Making of Samuel Beckett’s Trilogy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Retrieved from https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/making-of-samuel-becketts-malone-diesmalone-meurt-9781472523440/

Downloads

Published

2026-03-30

Issue

Section

Articles