DATA-DRIVEN VOCABULARY SELECTION AND MASTERY: INSTRUCTIONAL PRINCIPLES AND LEARNER AUTONOMY IN THE MOROCCAN EFL CONTEXT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejals.v9i1.702Keywords:
learner autonomy, Moroccan secondary schools, teaching strategies, pedagogical technique, vocabulary acquisitionAbstract
This study examined vocabulary instruction and learning in Moroccan secondary schools. The study highlighted the challenges students face and explored strategies for addressing them. It primarily identified and analyzed barriers to effective vocabulary acquisition. The research examined both instructional practices and learner behaviors. Surveys and interviews with teachers and students in Casablanca and Rabat revealed the main obstacles: lack of motivation, time constraints, first-language interference and difficulty applying new words in context. The study also evaluated and recommended proven instructional strategies. These included direct and indirect teaching methods, as well as promoting learner autonomy through group work, vocabulary notebooks, and digital tools. By systematically investigating these objectives, the study offered guidance to EFL teachers, textbook developers, and educational leaders on improving vocabulary teaching and learning in Moroccan secondary schools.References
Agrram, A. (2021). Higher education languages of instruction in Morocco and their impact on the receptive vocabulary size of Moroccan EFL master students. Arab World English Journal, 11. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3764253
Agrram, A., Mokhtari, N., & Laaboudi, D. (2023). The lexical profile of the Moroccan national high-stakes baccalaureate reading test materials: A corpus-based approach. International Journal of Linguistics and Translation Studies, 4(3), 58–80. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlts.v4i3.347
Agrram, A., Mokhtari, N., & Laaboudi, D. (2024). Examining the concurrent contribution of receptive and productive vocabulary breadth aspects to Moroccan EFL students' speaking ability. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=4903738
Agrram, A., Mokhtari, N., & Laaboudi, D. (2024). The contribution of vocabulary breadth and depth to narrative writing ability: A partial least squares structural equation modelling approach. Australian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(3), 1996. https://doi.org/10.29140/ajal.v7n3.1996
Alisoy, H., & Sadigzade, Z. (2025). Comparative analysis of mobile applications and traditional methods in vocabulary acquisition. Educational Process: International Journal. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.17.322
Anderson, R. C., & Nagy, W. E. (1992). The vocabulary conundrum. American Educator, 16(4), 14–18. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED354489.pdf
Aydin, R., Klein, L., Miribel, A., & West, R. (2021). Broccoli: Sprinkling lightweight vocabulary learning into everyday information diets. arXiv preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2104.07941
Baghit, R., Erguig, R., & Boudlal, A. (2024a). Moroccan graduate EFL students’ perceptions of online assessment: Benefits and challenges. Journal of Applied Language and Culture Studies, 7(2), 23–40. https://revues.imist.ma/index.php?journal=JALCS
Baghit, R., Laaboudi, D., & Erguig, R. (2024b). A study of the impact of online feedback on Moroccan EFL university students’ listening proficiency. Arab World English Journal, 15(4), 150–167. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol15no4.10
Boucher, V., & Lafleur, A. (2015). Repeating aloud to another person boosts recall. University of Montreal. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/10/151006142422.htm
Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3), 354–380. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354
Cervatiuc, A. (2008). ESL vocabulary acquisition: Target and approach. The Internet TESL Journal. https://iteslj.org/Articles/Cervatiuc-VocabularyAcquisition.html
Chanasattru, S., & Tangkiengsirisin, S. (2016). Developing a high-frequency word list in social sciences. Journal of Studies in the English Language, 11. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jsel/article/view/73309
Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213–238. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587951
El Garras, H., El Hanafi, M., & Ait Hammou, H. (2025). Unveiling Moroccan EFL teachers’ perceptions of the impact of explicit vocabulary instruction. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 8(1), 66–74. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2025.8.1.9
El Garras, H., Ghaicha, A., & Oufela, Y. (2025). Enhancing EFL learners’ reading comprehension through explicit instruction of formulaic language: An experimental study. Canadian Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 5(3), 93–111. https://doi.org/10.53103/cjlls.v5i3.213
Even-Zohar, C., Lakrec, T., & Tessler, R. J. (2020). Spectral analysis of word statistics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.00742. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2012.00742
Far-hat, M., & Ouchouid, J. (2025). An intervention study on Moroccan high schoolers’ difficulty in comprehending newly encountered vocabulary. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 198–208. https://doi.org/10.32996/jeltal.2025.7.1.18
Folse, K. S. (2004). Vocabulary myths: Applying second language research to classroom teaching. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.17813
Graves, M. F. (2016). The vocabulary book: Learning and instruction (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/The_Vocabulary_Book.html?id=iBSZ8KpX358C&redir_esc=y
Güngör, B., & Önder, A. (2023). Development of the English picture vocabulary test as an assessment tool for very young EFL learners’ receptive and expressive language skills. Early Education and Development, 34(2), 572–589. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2022.2043134
Kavé, G. (2024). Vocabulary changes in adulthood: Main findings and methodological considerations. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 59(1), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12820
Liu, D. (2015). A critical review of Krashen’s input hypothesis: Three major arguments. Journal of Education and Human Development, 4(4), 139–146. http://dx.doi.org/10.15640/jehd.v4n4a16
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524759
Nation, I. S. P. (2011). Research into practice: Vocabulary. Language Teaching, 44(4), 529–539. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000267
Nation, I. S. P. (2013). Learning vocabulary in another language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139858656
National Reading Panel (US), National Institute of Child Health, & Human Development (US). (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health.
Outamgharte, B., Yeou, M., & Zyad, H. (2024). The impact of narrow reading on the receptive vocabulary knowledge of Moroccan high school students. Anatolian Journal of Education, 9(2), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2024.9210a
Outamgharte, B., Yeou, M., & Zyad, H. (2025). Electronic L1 and L2 glosses’ impact on vocabulary acquisition of Moroccan English as a foreign language learners. Australian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 2236. https://doi.org/10.29140/ajal.v8n1.2236
Oxford, R. L. (2003). Language learning styles and strategies: An overview. GALA. Retrieved from https://web.ntpu.edu.tw/~language/workshop/read2.pdf
Peng, Z. (2025). The influence and significance of theory in second language teaching application: Taking Krashen's input hypothesis as an example. Journal of Education and Educational Research, 15(2), 106–110. https://doi.org/10.54097/yzcvfq14
Rajendran, I. V. (2023). Examining the effect of explicit instruction on vocabulary learning and on receptive-productive gap: An experimental study. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 19(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.2991/jlls.2023.19.1.1
Ricketts, J., Lervåg, A., Dawson, N., Taylor, L. A., & Hulme, C. (2020). Reading and oral vocabulary development in early adolescence. Scientific Studies of Reading, 24(5), 380–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2019.1689244
Saavedra, D. R. (2015). A game plan for 12 to 20 meaningful exposures. ASCD. https://www.ascd.org/el/articles/a-game-plan-for-12-to-20-meaningful-exposures
Saif, A., & Youness, K. (2019). An investigation into vocabulary learning strategies used by Moroccan EFL high achievers: IBN Roumi High School as a case study. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 4(12), 1–6. https://demostore.ijisrt.com/an-investigation-into-vocabulary-learning-strategies-used-by-moroccan-efl-high-achievers-ibn-roumi-high-school-as-a-case-study
Saksittanupab, P. (2024). Enhancing vocabulary acquisition and retention: The role of spaced repetition in language learning. Journal of Modern Learning Development, 9(5). https://doi.org/10.14456/jomld.2024.15
Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524759
Schmitt, N., & Schmitt, D. (2020). Vocabulary in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108569057
Smith, C. (2025). Challenges in English Language Education in Japan: Policy vs. Practice. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy 6(2). https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2025.6.2.912
Storch, N. (2013). Sociocultural Theory in the L2 Classroom. The Routledge Handbook of Instructed Second Language Acquisition. https://vdoc.pub/documents/the-routledge-handbook-of-instructed-second-language-acquisition-7kbl4o80a0m0
Sulistyawati, E., Nugroho, A., & Bram, B. (2019). Morphological teaching strategies to enhance students’ vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension. JET (Journal of English Teaching) 7(2). https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v7i2.2472
Sun, W., & Park, E. (2023). EFL learners’ collocation acquisition and learning in corpus-based instruction: A systematic review. Sustainability, 15(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/su151713242
Ulriksen, L. B., Bilet-Mossige, M., Larsen, K., & Nordahl-Hansen, A. (2026). Associations between receptive and expressive vocabulary and early literacy in young students with intellectual disabilities using AAC. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2026.105239
Webb, P. M. (2008). The effects of context on incidental vocabulary learning. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20(2), 232–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.11.002
Webb, S. A. (2007). The effects of repetition on vocabulary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 46–65. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml048
Webb, S., & Nation, I. S. P. (2017). How vocabulary is learned. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.25170/ijelt.v12i1.1458
White, L. (1987). Against comprehensible input: The input hypothesis and the development of second-language competence. Applied linguistics, 8(2), 95-110. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/8.2.95
Zhang, X. (2025). Vocabulary knowledge towards L2 reading and listening performance. Reading in a Foreign Language, 37(2), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/67500
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


