THE VALUE OF METAPHORS IN KEN WALIBORA’S KISWAHILI TEXT: ‘KIDAGAA KIMEMWOZEA’
Keywords:
metaphor, cognitive linguistics, conceptual mapping, The Great Chain of Being metaphor, Kidagaa KimemwozeaAbstract
The novelist Ken Walibora employs metaphors in his Kiswahili text Kidagaa Kimemwozea to discuss about the subject of neocolonialism in different perspectives. Due to the metaphoric language used, meaning might be elusive to the readers because metaphor is primarily a matter of thought and action which is normally situated in a specific context. This research, therefore, uses the Cognitive Linguistics framework to objectively reveal the meaning of the metaphors in the text. In the novel, the king (Mtemi Nasaha Bora) is expressed as irrational, dictatorial, oppressive and amorous. However, the protagonist (Amani) conspires with the king’s son to exploit the father’s weakness for the benefit of the common citizens. This study establishes the metaphors in the text using the Metaphor Identification Procedure Vrije Universiteit (MIPVU) and then classifies them into conceptual domains using the principle of Great Chain of Being Metaphor (GCBM). The conceptual mapping which is a tenet of the Conceptual Metaphor Theory is used to evaluate the identified metaphors. This study adopts a qualitative research approach. The paper reveals that animals, plants and objects are stratified source domains richly used to depict the characters in the novel. For a better appreciation of metaphors, the research recommends that it is salient to use the cognitive linguistics approach to understand contextual language against the cultural, historical and geographical backdrop. The paper concludes that metaphors are vital tools of communication and should be explained using the cognitive linguistics approach.
References
Baumeister, F.R., & Leary, R.M. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments asa fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529.
Boyle, A.W. (2006). Why do birds migrate? The role of food, habitat, predation and competition (Unpublished doctoral thesis), The University of Arizona, USA.
Cameron, L., & Low, G. (1999). Metaphor. Language Teaching, 32, 77-96.
Croft, W., & Cruse, D.A. (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dolvenry, S. (2013). African Lion (panther Leo) Behaviour, Monitoring, and Survival in Human Dominated Landscape (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Wincousin-Madison, USA.
Evans, V. (2007). Towards a cognitive compositional semantics. In U. Magnusson, H. Kardela and A. Glaz (Eds.), Further insights in semantics and lexicography (pp. 11– 42). Poland: University Marie Curie University Press.
Evans, V., & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive semantics: An introduction. Edinburg: Edinburg University Press.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
Gathigia, M.G. (2016). Metaphorical analysis of Murimi Wa Kahalf’s pop song: Ino Ni Momo. Proceedings of the Second International Research Conference (pp. 499-505). Chuka University, Kenya.
Geeraerts, D. (Ed). (2006). Cognitive Linguistics: Basic readings. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Gibbs, R.W. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Glucksberg, S. (2001). Understanding figurative language. From metaphor to idiom, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Grady, J.E., Oakley, T., & Coulson, S. (1999). Blending and metaphor. In G. Steen & R. Gibbs (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics (PP 1-56). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Goatly, A. (1997). The language of metaphors. London: Routledge.
Jones, A. (2006). Violence and “othering” in colonial and post-colonial Africa. Case study: Banda’s Malawi. Journal of African Cultural Studies, 18 (2), 197 -213.
Kleparski, G.A. (2008). The joys and sorrows of metaphorical consumption: Mozarellas, prostisciuttos, muttons and yum-yum girls – foodsemy with a romance accent, Zes zytynauk owe Uniwersyteturzeszowskiego, Seria Filologiczna Studiaanglicare Soviensia, 5, 45-59.
Kövecses, Z. (2002) Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture. Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Krickmann, A. (1998). On the relationship of the rhetorical, modal, logical and syntactic planes in Estonian proverbs. An Electronic Journal of Folklore, 8, 51-99.
Krzeszowski, T.P. (1997). Angels and devils in Hell: Elements of axiology in semantics. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Energeia.
Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 202-251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason. A field guide to poetic metaphor.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Langacker, R.W. (1991). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Lee, H. J. (1999). A cognitive semantics analysis of manipulative motion verbs in Korean with reference to English (Unpublished doctoral thesis), Rice University, South Korea.
López, I. (2009). Of women, bitches, chickens and vixens: animal metaphors for women in English and Spanish. Cultura, Lenguaje Representación/Culture, Language and Representation, 7 (7), 77-100.
Mugenda, A., & Mugenda, O. (2003). Research methods: quantitative and qualitative
approaches. Nairobi: Acts Press.
Nyakoe, G.N., Ongarora, D.O. & Oloo, P. (2014). An analysis of the food metaphor in EkeGusii HIV and AIDS discourse. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 4 (1), 221 -228.
Onchoke, A.S. (2018). A Cognitive Linguistics study of Ekegusii onomastics: The case of the metaphor. Linguistics and Literature Studies, 6(2), 88-98.
Palinkas, I. (2006). The Development of the senses Argumentum. Kossuth Egyetemi Kiado, Derecen, 2, 191-197.
Reis, M.D. (2000). An evaluation of bed bug (cimex lecturius L.) host, location and aggregation behaviour (Unpublished MSC thesis), Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, USA.
Rundell, M., & Fox, G. (2007). Macmillan English dictionary for advanced learners. London: Macmillan.
Singh, H.S. (2005). Status of the leopard panther pardus fusca in India. Cat News, 42, 15- 17.
Steen, G., Dorst, A.G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A.A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Tolle, E. (2005). A new Earth: Awakening to your life’s purpose. New York: Penguin Rondon House.
Ungerer, F. & Schmid, H. (1996). An introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. London: Addison Wesley Longman Ltd.
Walibora, K. (2012). Kidagaa Kimemwozea. Nairobi: Spotlight Publishers (EA) Limited.
Weaver, A.D. (2009). Exemplication in newspaper: A content analysis and case studies (Unpublished MSC thesis), Ohio University, USA.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
