UNVEILING THE CAUSAL LINK BETWEEN MONITORING STRATEGIES INSTRUCTION AND EFL READING COMPREHENSION OUTCOMES AMONG MOROCCAN ENGLISH DEPARTMENT UNIVERSITY STUDENTS: A METACOGNITIVE PERSPECTIVE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejlll.v8i2.545Keywords:
metacognition, comprehension-monitoring strategies, metacognitive experience, monitoring strategy training, self-efficacyAbstract
The current study, being part and parcel of my unpublished doctoral dissertation which is entitled “Moroccan EFL Students’ Learning of Cognitive and Metacognitive Reading Strategies: Rabat FLHS Semester One Students as a Case Study” (defended in 2015), is intended to unravel the conceived impact of comprehension-monitoring strategies instruction (self-monitoring, self-questioning, and rereading) on the first-semester English Department learners’ reading comprehension scores. It is a manifestation of the extended depth and scope of the conducted explicit training in monitoring strategies, as high-order metacognitive heuristics, in the promotion of the learners’ text-processing mode and reading performance in English (L3). With a view to achieving this stated goal, 113 first-semester university students (Control Group: N= 50; Experimental Group: N= 63) undertaking their studies in the English Department took part in this quasi-experimental study. The data were gathered through the implementation of the strategy training, a select range of ‘experimental’ reading comprehension texts (i.e., narrative, expository), and narrative and expository reading tests (pre-tests and post-tests). The research findings reveal that instruction in L3 comprehension monitoring strategies resulted in positive reading achievement gains at post-testing among the experimental group. As to the control group, it did not exhibit any developmental progress at the level of the reading scores across the pre-post-test continuum. Thus, some action-oriented recommendations and implications relative to the undertaken research study, as well as a few limitations, are plausibly brought forth.
References
Alderson, J. C. (2000). Assessing reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Amini, M., Zahabi, A., Amini, D., & Hosseini, S. S. A. (2020). A review of reading strategies and models in learning and teaching of English as a foreign language. AJELP: Asian Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 8(2), 14-26. https://doi.org/10.37134/ajelp.vol8.2.2.2020
Anderson, N. J. (2002). The role of metacognition in second/foreign language teaching and learning. ERIC Digest. ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics. https://www.cal.org/ericcll/digest/0110anderson.html
Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Cognitive monitoring in reading. In J. Flood (Ed.), Understanding reading comprehension (pp. 21-44). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 129.
Barnett, M.A. (1989). More than meets the eye: Foreign language reading theory and practice. New York: Prentice Hall.
Baumann, J. F., Seifert-Kessell, N., & Jones, L. A. (1992). Effect of think-aloud instruction on elementary students' comprehension monitoring abilities. Journal of Reading Behavior, 24(2), 143–172. https://doi:10.1080/10862969209547770
Block, E. (1986). The comprehension strategies of second language readers. TESOL Quarterly, 20(3), 463-494. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586295
Boulware-Gooden, R., Carreker, S., Thornhill, A., & Joshi, R. M. (2007). Instruction of metacognitive strategies enhances reading comprehension and vocabulary achievement of third-grade students. The Reading Teacher, 61 (1), 70-77.
Brown, A. L. (1981). Metacognition: The development of selective attention strategies for learning from texts. In M. L. Kamil (Ed.), Directions in reading: Research and instruction (pp. 501-529). Washington, D.C.: National Reading Conference.
Carnine, D. W., Silbert, J., Kame’enui, E. J., & Tarver, S. G. (2004). Direct instruction in reading (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson-Prentice Hall.
Carrell, P. L. (1983). Three components of background knowledge in reading comprehension. Language Learning, 33(2), 183-203. https://doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1983.tb00534.x.
Carrell, P. L. (1984). Schema theory and ESL reading: Classroom implications and applications. The Modern Language Journal, 68(4), 332-343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.15404781.1984.tb02509
Casanave, C. P. (1988). Comprehension monitoring in ESL reading: A neglected essential. TESOL Quarterly, 22(2), 283-302. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586937
Clay, M. M. (1991). Becoming literate: The construction of inner control. Portsmouth, NH, Heinemann
Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. New York: Longman.
Collins, A. & Smith, E. E. (1980). Teaching the process of reading comprehension. Illinois: Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc.
Conway, A. R. A., Moore, A. B., & Kane, M. J. (2009). Recent trends in the cognitive neuroscience of working memory. Cortex, 45 (2), 262-268. https://doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2008.05.006
Davies, F. (1995). Introducing reading. London: Penguin Group.
Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., & Pearson, P. D. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61 (2) 239-264.
Dowhower, S., L. (1989). Repeated reading: Research into practice. The Reading Teacher, 42 (7), 502-507.
Duffy, G. G. (2003). Explaining reading: A resource for teaching concepts, skills, and strategies. New York: Guilford Press
Dugassa, G., Olana, T., & Ali, S. (2022). Effects of explicit reading strategy instruction on grade 9 students’ achievement in reading comprehension. Educational Research International, 2022, 1-13. https://doi:10.1155/2022/7872840
Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed., pp. 205-242). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Duke, N. K., Pearson, P. D., Strachan, S. L., & Billman, A. K. (2011). Essential elements of fostering and teaching reading comprehension. In S.J. Samuels, & A.E. Farstrup (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (4th ed., pp. 51-93). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Edossa, A. K., Lockl, K., & Weinert, S. (2023). Developmental relationship between metacognitive monitoring and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 13 (1), 1-16. Canadian Center of Science and Education. https://doi:10.5539/jedp.v13n1p1.
Fan, Y. C. (2010). The effect of comprehension strategy instruction on EFL learners’ reading comprehension. Asian Social Science, 6 (8), 19-29. https://doi:10.5539/ass.v6n8p19
Flavell, J. H. (1971). First discussant’s comments: What is memory development the development of? Human Development, 14(4), 272-278. https://doi.org/10.1159/000271221
Flavell, J. H. (1981). Cognitive Monitoring. In W. P. Dickson (Ed.), Children’s oral communication skills. New York: Academic Press.
Garner, R. (1987). Metacognition and reading comprehension. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex
Giladi, A., Koslowsky, M., & Davidovitch, N. (2022). Effort as a mediator of the relationship between English learning self-efficacy and reading comprehension performance in the EFL field: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Higher Education, 11 (1), 114-125. https://doi:10.5430/ijhe.v11n1p114
Gough, P. B. (1976). One second of reading. In H. Singer & R. P. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (2nd ed., pp. 509-535). Newark, DE: International Reading Association
Huff, J. D., & Nietfeld, J. L. (2009). Using strategy instruction and confidence judgments to improve metacognitive monitoring. Metacognition and Learning, 4 (2), 161-176.
Joseph, L. M. (2005). The role of self-monitoring in literacy learning. In S.E. Israel, C.C. Block, K.L. Bouserman, & K. Kinnucan-Welsch (Eds.), Metacognition in literacy learning: Theory, assessment, instruction and professional development (pp. 199-214). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Kim, M. (2022). Exploring literal and inferential reading comprehension among L2 adolescent learners: The roles of working memory capacity, syllogistic inference, and L2 linguistic knowledge. Reading and Writing, 36 (2), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10320-3
Lin, Z. (2002). Discovering EFL learners’ perception of prior knowledge and its roles in reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 25(2), 172-190.
Magliano, J., P., Todaro, S., Millis, K., Wiemer-Hastings, K., Kim, H., J., McNamara, D., S. (2005). Changes in reading strategies as a function of reading training: A comparison of live and computerized training. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32 (2), 185-208.
Msaddek, M. (2013). The role of metacognitive thinking in text processing. In A. Zaki, M. Najbi, & A. Chaibi (Eds.), Critical Thinking Skills in English Language Education: Proceedings of the 32nd Moroccan Association of Teachers of English Annual Conference Oujda, April 9 through 12, 2012 (pp. 41-46). Oujda: Publication of the Moroccan Association of Teachers of English (MATE). Printed by Safahate Design, Béni Mellal. Dépôt légal: 2013 M0 0221. ISBN: 978-9981-9537-3-4
Msaddek, M. (2015). Moroccan EFL Students’ Learning of Cognitive and Metacognitive Reading Strategies: Rabat FLHS Semester One Students as a Case Study (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Faculty of Letters and Human Sciences, Mohamed V University, Rabat, Morocco.
Msaddek, M. (2016). The impact of metacognitive strategy training on comprehension monitoring among Moroccan EFL university learners. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 7(4), 139-154. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol7no4
Msaddek, M. (2020). The incorporation of self-questioning training in the reading comprehension course: The case of Moroccan EFL university learners. Studies in Literature and Language, 20 (3), 6-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/11754
Muche, T., Simegn, B., & Shiferie, K. (2023). Self-efficacy and metacognitive strategy use in reading comprehension: EFL learners’ perspectives. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 33(1), 219–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-023-00721-5
Nietfeld, J., & Schraw, G. (2002). The effect of knowledge and strategy training on monitoring accuracy. The Journal of Educational Research, 95 (3), 131–142. https://doi:10.1080/00220670209596583
Nist, S., & Holschuh, J. L. (2000). Comprehension strategies at the college level. In R. F. Flippo & D. C. Caverly (Eds.), Handbook of college reading and study strategy research (pp. 75-104). Longman: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Nolan, T. E. (1991). Self-questioning and prediction: Combining metacognitive strategies. Journal of Reading, 35 (2), 132-138.
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston, Massachusetts: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Paris, S. G., & Myers, M. (1981). Comprehension monitoring, memory, and study strategies of good and poor readers. Journal of Reading Behaviour, 13(1), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862968109547390
Pressley, M. (2000). What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 545–561). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rayner, K. (1978). Eye movements in reading and information processing. Psychological Bulletin, 85(3), 618-660. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.85.3.618
Reid, R., & Lienemann, T. O. (2006). Strategy instruction for students with learning disabilities. New York & London: The Guilford Press.
Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. New Jersey: Erlbaum.
Schmitt, M. C., & Newby, T. J. (1986). Metacognition: Relevance to instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 9(4), 29-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02908316
Taraban, R., Kerr, M., & Rynearson, K. (2004). Analytic and pragmatic factors in college students’ metacognitive reading strategies. Reading Psychology, 25, 67-81.
Turkeltaub, P. E., Gareau, L., Flowers, D. L., Zeffiro, T. A., & Eden, G. F. (2003). Development of neural mechanisms for reading. Nature Neuroscience, 6(7), 767–773. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1065
Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1 (1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0
Wang, C., Schwab, G., Fenn, P., & Chang, M. (2013). Self-efficacy and self-regulated learning strategies for English language learners: Comparison between Chinese and German college students. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 3(1), 173-191. https://doi.org/10.5539/jedp.v3n1p173
Williams, E. (1984). Reading in the language classroom. London: Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
Zhang, L. J. (2002). Exploring EFL reading as a metacognitive experience: Reader awareness and reading performance. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 12, 69-94.
Zhou, J. & Day, R. R. (2023). Establishing an extensive reading program in a Chinese as a foreign language context. Reading in a Foreign Language, 35(2), 222-246. https://hdl.handle.net/10125/67448
