ENHANCING THE READING SKILLS OF BSED-ENGLISH COLLEGE STUDENTS THROUGH INTERACTIVE READING STRATEGY

Authors

  • Niño B. Dela Salde College Instructor, Davao Central College, Davao, Philippines
  • Quennie E. Monte College Instructor, Southeastern College of Padada, Inc., Davao, Philippines
  • Lemuel J. Segara College Instructor, St. John Paul II College of Davao, Davao, Philippines
  • Edroslyn J. Fernandez Vice President for Academic Affairs, City College of Davao, Davao, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejlll.v9i2.616

Keywords:

interactive reading strategies, reading comprehension, mixed methods, student engagement, BSED students

Abstract

This mixed-methods study examined the effectiveness of interactive reading strategies in enhancing the reading comprehension of Bachelor of Secondary Education (BSED) English students. A quasi-experimental approach was used to compare pre-test and post-test scores between an experimental group taught using interactive strategies and a control group taught through traditional methods. Quantitative results showed that the experimental group achieved a significantly higher mean gain, indicating the effectiveness of interactive strategies. The qualitative phase further enriched these findings, revealing that students experienced increased engagement, motivation, and improved understanding through collaborative and student-centered reading activities. The integration of both data sets highlights the value of interactive reading strategies in fostering comprehension and positive learning experiences. These results support the adoption of innovative, evidence-based practices in language instruction.

Author Biographies

  • Niño B. Dela Salde, College Instructor, Davao Central College, Davao, Philippines

    Mr. Niño B. Dela Salde is a licensed professional teacher and a graduate of the University of Mindanao. He is currently a college instructor at Davao Central College, where he handles a range of language-related and general education subjects. With a strong foundation in English education, he integrates innovative teaching approaches in his classes, particularly in the areas of grammar, writing, and educational research. His dedication to student development is evident through his dynamic classroom strategies and focus on 21st-century learning skills.

  • Quennie E. Monte, College Instructor, Southeastern College of Padada, Inc., Davao, Philippines

    Ms. Quennie E. Monte is a licensed professional teacher and educator based in Davao, currently associated with Southeastern College of Padada, Inc. She integrates motivational strategies and anxiety-awareness into her language teaching approach. Her work reflects a commitment to evidence-based instruction designed to enhance both learner confidence and proficiency.

  • Lemuel J. Segara, College Instructor, St. John Paul II College of Davao, Davao, Philippines

    Mr. Lemuel J. Segara is a licensed professional teacher and seasoned college instructor based in Davao City, Philippines. He currently teaches grammar, verb tenses, and language-related subjects alongside general education courses at St. John Paul College of Davao. With a robust focus on practical language instruction, he employs interdisciplinary methodologies in his teaching.

  • Edroslyn J. Fernandez, Vice President for Academic Affairs, City College of Davao, Davao, Philippines

    Dr. Edroslyn J. Fernandez is a distinguished Philippine educator and researcher with a solid academic background and a significant portfolio of publications in discourse analysis, educational leadership, faculty development, and language studies. She occupies key academic leadership positions in multiple Davao-based higher‑education institutions and is recognized not only for her administrative roles but also for her active scholarly contributions.

References

Alexander, P. A. (2018). The development of conceptual understanding and the role of the ZPD in learning. Educational Psychologist, 53(3), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2018.1469411

Bernardo, A. B. I. (2019). Literacy development in Philippine education: Challenges and strategies. Philippine Journal of Education, 97(2), 14–25.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Research-Methods-in-Education/Cohen-Manion-Morrison/p/book/9781138209886

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. Retrieved from https://www.ucg.ac.me/skladiste/blog_609332/objava_105202/fajlovi/Creswell.pdf

Daniels, H. (2001). Vygotsky and pedagogy. Routledge. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203469576

Daniels, H. (2018). Vygotsky and pedagogy: A social constructivist approach to teaching. Routledge.

Denscombe, M. (2014). The good research guide: For small-scale social research projects (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338804805_The_Good_Research_Guide_For_small-scale_social_research_projects_Fifth_Edition

Department of Education (DepEd). (2019). Philippines' performance in PISA 2018. Department of Education, Philippines. Retrieved from https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/PISA-2018-Philippine-National-Report.pdf

Duke, N. K., & Cartwright, K. B. (2021). The science of reading comprehension instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(S1), S99–S115. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.411

Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. Retrieved from http://repo.darmajaya.ac.id/5678/1/Discovering%20Statistics%20Using%20IBM%20SPSS%20Statistics%20(%20PDFDrive%20).pdf

Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2020). Engaging readers: Strategies for comprehension and fluency. Guilford Press. Retrieved from https://www.ascd.org/el/articles/the-skill-will-and-thrill-of-reading-comprehension

Guthrie, J. T., & Klauda, S. L. (2020). Engagement and motivation in reading: Research and implications. Educational Psychology Review, 32(3), 545–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09505-3

Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 403–422). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2000-07600-009

Hammond, J., & Gibbons, P. (2020). Scaffolding literacy in an educational setting: The role of the ZPD. Journal of Literacy Research, 52(4), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X20953803

Hwang, G. J., & Lai, C. L. (2021). Trends and research issues of mobile-assisted language learning. Educational Technology & Society, 24(2), 91–103.

Kendeou, P., van den Broek, P., White, M. J., & Lynch, J. S. (2009). Predicting reading comprehension in early elementary school: The independent contributions of oral language and decoding skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 765–778. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015956

Kim, Y. S. G., Petscher, Y., Schatschneider, C., & Foorman, B. R. (2021). The importance of motivation and engagement in reading development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(6), 1085–1101. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000631

Kvale, S. (2007). Doing interviews. SAGE Publications. Retrieved from https://methods.sagepub.com/book/mono/doing-interviews/toc

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons. Retrieved from https://download.e-bookshelf.de/download/0003/7195/84/L-G-0003719584-0007575839.pdf

Murphy, P. K., Rowe, M. L., & Harris, K. R. (2021). The role of discussion-based instruction in fostering comprehension. Journal of Literacy Research, 53(1), 28–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X20973834

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2019). PISA 2018 results: Combined executive summaries. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/Combined_Executive_Summaries_PISA_2018.pdf

Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117–175. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1

Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step-by-step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (7th ed.). Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781003117452/spss-survival-manual-julie-pallant

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. Retrieved from https://aulasvirtuales.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/qualitative-research-evaluation-methods-by-michael-patton.pdf

Shanahan, T. (2020). How reading comprehension develops. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), S219–S230. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.340

Downloads

Published

2025-06-17

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025)

Section

Articles