KINSHIP AND POWER RELATIONSHIPS IN COON’S FLESH OF THE WILD OX AND THE RIFFIAN

Authors

  • Mohamed Saili Faculty of Letters and Human Sciences Ben M’sik, University Hassan II, Casablanca, Morocco

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejls.v3i1.311

Keywords:

Coon, Flesh of the Wild Ox, The Riffian, kinship, power, intra-kin and inter-kin relationships, exclusiveness, elasticity

Abstract

This study explores two novels titled Flesh of the Wild Ox (1932) and The Riffian (1933) written by Carleton S. Coon about the Moroccan Rif. These roughly unexplored novels are by an ethnographer and derive from an ethnography titled Tribes of the Rif (1931). Indeed, they “boast” themes usually seen as ethnographic in nature: kinship, marriage, polygyny, honour and shame, magic, subsistence pattern and inter-tribal warfare. This study is set within the convergence of literature and ethnography, striving to foreground the ethnographicity within the novels. It brings kinship into focus, notably investigating how kinship works in relation to power. It distinguishes twin kin power relationships: intra-kin and inter-kin. Intra-kin power relationships are domestic, involving individuals of a single kin group while inter-kin power relationships are transdomestic, involving individuals of different descent groups or the groups themselves. In both relationships, kinship operates inclusively as the Riffian characters strive to expand the number of individuals and groupings who, in Schweitzer’s words, can be “made into relatives” (210). The Riffians use inclusive strategies, including polygyny, exogamy and shame compulsion, so they can extend kin ties to non-kin. Those kinship strategies validate the the elasticity of kin boundaries among the Riffians.

 

Author Biography

  • Mohamed Saili, Faculty of Letters and Human Sciences Ben M’sik, University Hassan II, Casablanca, Morocco
    Mohamed Saili is an English teacher at Les Classes préparatoires aux grandes écoles (CPGE), Lycée al-Khansaa, Casablanca, Morocco. He is a doctorate student affiliated with the Moroccan American Studies Laboratory at the Faculty of Letters and Human Sciences Ben M’sik. His scholarly interests include Moroccan American Studies, literary criticism, the Moroccan novel in Arabic and the Arabic novel at large.

References

Carsten, Janet. “Kinship.” Britannica, 5 April 2012, www.britannica.com/topic/kinship. Accessed 15 December 2021.

Cesareo, Mario. “Anthropology and Literature: Of Bedfellows and Illegitimate Offspring.” Between Anthropology and Literature: Interdisciplinary Discourse, edited by Rose de Angelis, Routledge, 2003, pp. 158-74.

Chtatou, Mohamed. “Encounter with American Anthropologists in Morocco.” Hesperis Tamuda, vol. 55, no. 2, 2020, pp. 163-287.

Collier, Jane, et al. Gender and Kinship: Essays Toward a Unified Analysis. Stanford University Press, 1987.

Coon, Carleton S. A North Africa Story: The Anthropologist As OSS Agent 1941-1943. Gambit, 1980.

---. Flesh of the Wild Ox: A Riffian Chronicle of High Valleys and Long Rifles. W. Morrow, 1932.

---. The Riffian. Little Brown, 1933.

---. Tribes of the Rif. Peabody Museum Press, 1931.

Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Translated by Alan Sheridan, Vintage Books, 1995.

Foucault, Michel. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977. Translated by Colin Gordon, Vintage Books, 2015.

Foucault, Michel. The History of Sexuality. Translated by Robert Hurley, Vintage Books, 1990. Print.

Fox, Robin. Kinship and Marriage: An Anthropological Perspective. Cambridge University Press, 1983.

Holy, Ladislav. Anthropological Perspectives on Kinship. Pluto Press, 2002.

Keen, Ian. “Polygyny.” Encyclopedia of Anthropology, edited by H. James Birx, Sage Publications, 2006, pp. 1882-84.

Keesing, Roger M. Kin Groups and Social Structure. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1975.

Kingsolver, Ann. “Power.” The Routledge Encyclopedia of Social and Cultural Anthropology, edited by Alan Barnard and Jonathan Spencer, Routledge, 2010, pp. 565-68.

Lévi-Strauss, Claude. The Elementary Structures of Kinship. Translated by James Harle Bell, John Richard von Sturmer and Rodney Needham, Eyre & Spottiswoode, 1970.

Lukes, Steven. Power: A Radical View. Red Globe Press, 2021.

McCall, Daniel F. “American Anthropology and Africa.” African Studies Bulletin, vol. 10 no. 2, 1967, pp. 20-34.

Newman, Saul. “Power.” International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, edited by William A. Darity Jr., Macmillan Reference USA, 2008, pp. 412-14.

O’Farrell, Clare. Michel Foucault. Sage Publications, 2014.

Ottenheimer, Martin. “The Current Controversy in Kinship.” Czech Sociological Review, vol. 9, no. 2, 2001, pp. 201-10, http://www.jstor.org/stable/41133183.

Rapport, Nigel. Social and Cultural Anthropology: The Key Concepts. Routledge, 2014.

Rodman, Hyman. “Marital Power and the Theory of Resources in Cultural Context.” Journal of Comparative Family Studies, vol. 3, no. 1, 1972, pp. 50–69, http://www.jstor.org/stable/41600800.

Schmidt, Nancy. “Carleton Coon: A Pioneer in Anthropological Literary Genres.” Anthropology and Humanism Quarterly, vol. 10, no. 2, 1985, pp. 40-45.

Schneider, David M. A Critique of the Study of Kinship. University of Michigan Press, 1984.

Schweitzer, Peter P. Dividends of Kinship: Meanings of Uses of Social Relatedness. Routledge, 2000

Stone, Linda. New Directions in Anthropological Kinship. Rowman & Littlefield, 2001.

Velioti-Georgopoulos, Maria. “Endogamy.” Encyclopedia of Anthropology, edited by H. James Birx, Sage Publications, 2006, pp. 813-14.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-29

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2021)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).