THE ELIF SHAFAK MANIA IN THE GLOBAL LITERARY MARKET: THE FORTY RULES OF LOVE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejls.v6i1.625Keywords:
World Literature, Elif Shafak, market commodity, global audience, The Forty Rules of LoveAbstract
This article proposes a rereading of Shafak’s fiction in the light of the debates surrounding World Literature and the global novel. It takes stock of the findings of World Literature critics to envisage Shafak’s texts as market commodities, cognizant of the dilemmas and stakes involved when writing for a global audience. The paper further examines The Forty Rules of Love, and probes to what extent it is constructed as a consumable narrative/text designed for a Western cosmopolitan readership, while showcasing the way it flirts with global tastes to comply with the imperatives of the mainstream literary market.
Article visualizations:
References
a. Primary Sources
Shafak, Elif, 2009. The Forty Rules of Love. Penguin Books.
……………, 2006. The Bastard of Istanbul. Penguin Books.
b. Secondary Sources
Abu Lughod, Janet Lippman, 1994. The World System in The Thirteenth Century: Dead End Or Precursor?. Amer Historical Assn. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/worldsysteminthi0000abul/page/n13/mode/2up
…………….Before European Hegemony, The World System A.D. 1250-1350. 1991. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://academic.oup.com/book/54378
Adil, Alev, 2006. Western Eyes: Turkish Literature in A British Context. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/180991/Western_Eyes_Turkish_Literature_in_a_British_Context
Gérald Maclean (Ed.) Writing Turkey: Explorations in Turkish History, Politics and Cultural Identity. London: Middlesex University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S2151348100000823
Akbari, Ehsan, 2016. “Rumi, A Cosmopolitan Counter-narrative to Islamophobia”. Journal of Cultural Research in Art Education. Vol. 33. Retrieved from https://journals.librarypublishing.arizona.edu/jcrae/article/id/4896/
Akbatur, Arzu, 2011. ‘’Turkish Women Writers in English Translation’’. 161-179. DOI :10.6035/MonTI.2011.3.6. Retrieved from https://rua.ua.es/dspace/bitstream/10045/21611/1/MonTI_3_07.pdf
Altaf, Shahzad Mubashar, 2019. ‘A Derridian Critique of The Forty Rules of Love’. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Research. Volume 5, Issue 6, 31-35. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/42663839/A_Derridean_Critique_of_the_Forty_Rules_of_Love
Azal, N. Wahid, 2016. ‘Rumification by Hollywood: Whitelash and Blacklash’. Counterpunch. https://html.scribdassets.com/lxkoceq4g05cbarj/images/2eb4fa213db.pg.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1993. The Field of Cultural Production. Columbia Univ. Press. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/fieldofculturalp00bour
Canseven, Cansu, 2015. Looking through Translation: The importance of Chick Literature in Turkey via Translations and/or Rewriting. Bogazici University. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/42158547/LOOKING_THROUGH_TRANSLATION_THE_IMPORTATION_OF_CHICK_LIT_IN_TURKEY_VIA_TRANSLATIONS_AND_OR_REWRITINGS
Casanova, Pascale, 1999. The World Republic of Letters. Harvard University Press. Cambridge. Massachusetts London. England. Retrieved from https://koncontributes.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/casanova-world-republic.pdf
Dayekh, R, 2016. ‘Structure and Narrative Technique in The Forty Rules of Love’. Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Research 2(12): 1718-1724. Retrieved from https://www.damascusuniversity.edu.sy/human/downloads/files/1587634380_4.pdf
D’haen, Theo, 2012. Mapping World Literature. The Routledge Companion to World Literature. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/2306687/Mapping_World_Literature
Theo D’haen, David Damrosch and Djelal Kadir, The Routledge Companion to World Literature Ed. London: Routledge, 413-22. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003230663
El Zein, Amira, 2000. ‘Spiritual Consumption in the United States: The Rumi Phenomenon. Islam and Christian-Muslim relations (11):71-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/095964100111526
Erguvan, Mehmet, 2016. ‘Turkish Literature on the Move: Tracing the Itinerary of Ahmet Umit’. mTm Minor Translating Major-Major Translating Minor-Minor Translating Minor. Vol. 8. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/33910998/Turkish_Literature_on_the_Move_Tracing_the_Itinerary_of_Ahmet_%C3%9Cmit
Furlanetto, Elena, 2013. ‘The Rumi Phenomenon between Orientalism and Cosmopolitanism: The Case of Elif Shafak’s The Forty Rules of Love’. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13825577.2013.797210
Genette, Gérard, 1997. Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation. Cambridge Univ. Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Paratexts.html?id=AmWhQzemk2EC&redir_esc=y
Ghandeharion, and Khajavian, Fatemeh, 2019. ‘As Rumi Travels along the Silk Road in Feminist Costume: Shafak’s The Forty Rules of Love’. Acta via Serica. Vol. 4. No 1: 71-86. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338922526_As_Rumi_Travels_along_the_Silk_Road_in_Feminist_Costume_Shafak's_The_Forty_Rules_of_Love
Gun, Gumeli, 2006. ‘The Woman in the Dark Room: Contemporary Women Writers in Turkey.’ World Literature Today 60 :2. 275-279. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/40141697
Hauchard, Mélanie, Parlak, E, Kartal, 2018. ‘L’Orientalisme d’Elif Shafak dans la Bâtarde D’Istanbul’l. Rume LIDE Journal of Language and Literary Studies. 242-258. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/461463
Graham, Huggan, 2001. The Postcolonial Exotic: Marketing the Margins. Routledge. London. Retrieved from https://paas.org.pl/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Huggan_PrizingOtherness_2001.pdf
Mufti, Amir, 2010. ‘Orientalism and The Institution of World Literatures’. The University of Chicago. Critical Enquiry 36. Retrieved from https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/653408
Nihad, Mohammed, 2019. ‘Elif Shafak: The Voices of the Other’. Opcion 21. 2900-2913. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335201590_Elif_Shafak_The_Voice_of_The_Other
Paker, Saliha, 1991.’Unmuffled Voices in the Shade and Beyond: Women’s Writing in Turkish’. Textual Liberation: European Feminist Writing in the Twentieth Century. London. Routledge. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315739823-18
Pandit, Hufaiza, 2018. ‘The Mythic and The Miraculous: The Problem of Gender in The Forty Rules of Love’. Akademos. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/38737791/The_mythic_and_Miraculous_The_problem_of_gender_in_Forty_Rules_of_Love
Parks, Tim, 2010. The Dull New Global Novel. NRY daily. The New York Review of Books. Retrieved from https://www.nybooks.com/online/2010/02/09/the-dull-new-global-novel/
Poole, J, 2010. ‘Bastardized History: Elif Shafak’s Transcultural Poetics’, Transcultural Spaces: Challenges of Urbanity, Ecology and the Environment in the New Millenium Ed. Stefan. L. Brand, Winfried Fluick and Frank Mehring. 213-230. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322466330_Bastardized_History_Elif_Shafak's_Transnational_Poetics
Sedwig, Mark, 2017. ‘Eclectic Sufism in the Contemporary Arab World’. Tidsskrift for Islamforskning. https://doi.org/10.7146/tifo.v1lil.102873.
Shah, Umra Syed, 2016. ‘Resuscitating Esoteric Islam: An Islamic Feminist Study of Elif Shafak’s Forty Rules of Love’. International Journal of English Language, Literature and Humanities. Volume IV. Issue III. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/33330929/Resuscitating_Esoteric_Islam_An_Islamic_Feministic_Study_of_Elif_Shafak_s_The_Forty_Rules_of_Love
Shahzad, Qaiser and Altaf, Mubashar, 2019. ‘A Derridian Critique of The Forty Rules of Love’. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Research. Volume 5. Issue 6. 31-35. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/42663839/A_Derridean_Critique_of_the_Forty_Rules_of_Love
Walkowitz, L. Rebecca, 2015. Born-translated Novels, The Contemporary Novel in an Age of World Literature. Columbia University Press. New York Chichester. West-Sussex.
Watroba, Carolina, 2017. ‘World Literature and Literary Value: Is ‘Global’ the New‘ Lowbrow’?’. Cambridge Univ. Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/pli.2017.41.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


