NEGATIVE DIALECTICS OF PROGRESS IN THE PLANET OF THE APES TRILOGY: FROM TECHNOPHILIA TO TECHNOPHOBIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejls.v7i2.742Keywords:
Planet of the Apes, technological progress, technophilia, technophobia, instrumental reason, dystopia, domination of nature.Abstract
The reboot Planet of the Apes Trilogy, Rise of the Planet of the Apes (2011), Dawn of the Planet of the Apes (2014), and War for the Planet of the Apes (2017), begins with a recognizably technophilic promise: scientific innovation will overcome biological vulnerability. Yet the attempt to cure Alzheimer’s disease produces the Simian flu, resulting in the acceleration of ape cognition and precipitating human civilisational collapse. This article argues that the trilogy stages a negative dialectic of progress in which the rational instruments designed to extend human life and our mastery over disease and nonhuman nature generate new forms of vulnerability, domination, and regression. By reading the films through the Frankfurt School critique of instrumental reason and William Leiss’s account of the domination of nature, the article aims to trace a movement from technological confidence to technological fear. It focuses on Gen-Sys, animal experimentation, the pandemic, the persistence of weaponry after social collapse, as well as the visual reclamation of San Francisco by the growing vegetation. The trilogy does not simply condemn technology, nor is that the aim of this paper; rather, the paper aims to show how the trilogy questions a model of progress in which scientific capacity is detached from any ethical responsibility and organized around total domination and control. The trilogy’s dystopian force lies mainly in demonstrating how humanity’s attempt to control nature through science and technology ultimately contributes to its own downfall.
References
Boulle, Pierre. Planet of the Apes. Translated by Xan Fielding, Del Rey, 2001.
Dawn of the Planet of the Apes. Directed by Matt Reeves, performances by Andy Serkis, Jason Clarke, Gary Oldman, and Keri Russell, 20th Century Fox, 2014. Retrieved from https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2103281/
Greene, Eric. Planet of the Apes as American Myth: Race and Politics in the Films and Television Series. McFarland, 1996. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Planet_of_the_Apes_as_American_Myth.html?hl=pt-PT&id=1L8IEQAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
Horkheimer, Max, and Theodor W. Adorno. Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments. Edited by Gunzelin Schmid Noerr, translated by Edmund Jephcott, Stanford UP, 2002. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Dialectic_of_Enlightenment.html?id=HIkwCgAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
Ingram, Penelope. “Simian Flu or Ebola Redux.” Imperiled Whiteness: How Hollywood and Media Make Race in “Postracial” America, UP of Mississippi, 2023, pp. 101–24. https://doi.org/10.14325/mississippi/9781496845498.003.0004
Kilgore, De Witt Douglas. “Planet of the Apes.” Oxford Bibliographies in Cinema and Media Studies, Oxford UP, 31 July 2019, https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199791286-0318
Leiss, William. The Domination of Nature. McGill-Queen’s UP, 1994. https://doi.org/10.2307/3102334
Rise of the Planet of the Apes. Directed by Rupert Wyatt, performances by James Franco, Andy Serkis, Freida Pinto, and John Lithgow, 20th Century Fox, 2011. Retrieved from https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1318514/
Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus. 1818. Edited by J. Paul Hunter, 2nd ed., W. W. Norton, 2012. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Frankenstein_or_The_Modern_Prometheus.html?id=2Zc3AAAAYAAJ&redir_esc=y
War for the Planet of the Apes. Directed by Matt Reeves, performances by Andy Serkis and Woody Harrelson, 20th Century Fox, 2017. Retrieved from https://www.imdb.com/title/tt3450958/
West, Thomas J., III. “Going Ape: Animacy and Affect in Rise of the Planet of the Apes (2011).” New Review of Film and Television Studies, vol. 17, no. 2, 2019, pp. 236–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/17400309.2019.1602980
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


