RISING AWARENESS AND SELFHOOD IN KATE CHOPIN’S ‘THE AWAKENING’ AND ‘THE GOLDEN NOTEBOOK’ BY DORIS LESSING
Keywords:
selfhood/subjectivity, signification process, L’ecriture feminine, The Awakening, The Golden NotebookAbstract
The postmodern idea of the self as fragmented and decentred in contrast with earlier traditions’ idea of a rational, stable and autonomous self has great implications in the positionality of the woman in patriarchal discourse. This study applied a close reading of The Awakening and The Golden Notebook based on ideas from the new French feminist’s theories of Kristeva, Cixous and Irigaray that indicate that the woman whose patriarchal discourses of Freud and Lacan placed outside the Symbolic, outside language has the resources to re-position and write herself as a subject. The paper used the ‘signification process’ by Kristeva, supported by ideas from the discourses of Irigaray and Cixous, to trace the woman’s progress through abjection into destabilising patriarchal representations of the female and rewriting herself. The female protagonists destabilised their entrenched representations, re-invented their own idea of femininity and affirmed The Awakening and The Golden Notebook as L’ecriture feminine (feminine writing).
References
Allen, G. 2000. The New Critical Idiom. London & New York: Routledge.
Beauvoir, S. d. 1979. The Second Sex. Trans. H. M. Parshley, New York: Vintage.
Cavallaro, D. 2003. French Feminist Theory: An Introduction. New York: Continuum.
Cixous, H. 1976. The laugh of the Medusa. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 1(4), 875-893.
Chopin, K. 1984. The Awakening. New York: Penguin.
Degler, C. 1974. What ought to be and what was: women's sexuality in the 19th century. The American Historical Review, 79(5), 1467-1490.
Freud, S. 1913. The Interpretation of Dreams. Trans. A. Brill. New York: The Macmillan Company.
Gilbert, S. 1983. The Second Coming of Aphrodite: Kate Chopin's Fantasy of Desire. Kenyon Review, 5(3), 42-46.
Hall, D. E. 2004. Subjectivity. New York & London: Routledge.
Irigaray, L.1985. This Sex Which Is Not one. Trans. C. Porter, & C. Burke. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
______1996. I Love to You: Sketch of a Possible Felicity in History. Trans. Martin. New York: Routledge.
Lacan, J. 1982. Feminine Sexuality. J. Mitchell & J. Rose,( Eds). Trans. J. Rose. New York: Norton.
______ 2002. Ecrits: A Selection. Trans. B. Fink. New York: Norton.
Kristeva, J. 1980. Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. L. Roudiez, (ed.), Trans, T. Gorg, A. Jardine, & L. S. Roudiez. New York: Columbia University Press.
______1982. The Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. Trans. L. S. Roudiez. New York: Columbia University Press.
______1984. Revolution in Poetic Language. Trans. M. Waller. New York: Columbia University Press.
______1986. The Kristeva Reader. T. Moi (ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.
______1986b. A Question of subjectivity. Women's Review: an interview, 12, 19-22.
______2000. The Sense and Non-sense of Revolt: The Powers and Limits of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 1. Trans. Herman. New York: Columbia University Press.
Lessing, D. 2014. The Golden Notebook. London: Fourth Estate.
Moi, T. 1985. Sexual/Textual Politics. London & New York: Routledge.
Weedon, C. 1987. Feminist Practice and Post-structuralist Theory. New York: Blackwell Publishers.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


