CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF HOUSING COOPERATIVES IN KENYA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejefr.v0i0.185Schlagwörter:
corporate governance, financial performance, housing cooperatives, KenyaAbstract
Housing cooperatives were introduced in Kenya in the early 1980s and currently there are 650 registered housing cooperatives which are affiliated to the National Cooperative Housing Union (NACHU). Official statistics obtained from the Ministry of Co-operative Development as at 2010 show 424 housing co-operatives as having been registered, 79 out of these being dormant, 16 having been liquidated and 329 active. This clearly indicates that some housing cooperatives have not achieved the objectives for which they were formed. This begs the question on Corporate Governance Practices have any effect on the financial performance of housing cooperatives in Kenya. A sample size of 59 housing cooperatives was used from a target population of 650 housing cooperatives. Random sampling technique was used to obtain the sample size and was derived using the Fischer formula: . Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient for accountability and financial performance was r = 0.366**, with probability value (p = 0.000) that is less than α = 0.01 level of significance showing a moderate effect of accountability on financial performance at the one percent level of significance. Adjusted R square value was 0.118 implying that financial performance is dependent on accountability by 11.8%. Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient for auditing committees and financial performance was r = 0.351**, with a probability value (p = 0.000) that is less than α = 0.01 level of significance showing a significant effect of auditing committees on financial performance at the one percent level of significance. Therefore, findings revealed that auditing committees significantly affects financial performance. Adjusted R square was 0.107 implying that auditing committees predicts financial performance by 10.7%.Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient for separation of ownership and financial performance was r = 0.289*, with probability value (p = 0.000) that is less than α = 0.05 level of significance showing a significant effect of separation of ownership on financial performance at the five percent level of significance. Therefore, it was found out that separation of ownership significantly affects financial performance. Adjusted R square value was 0. 066. This implied that financial performance is dependent on separation of ownership. Separation of ownership predicts financial performance by 6.6 %.Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient for moderating variables and financial performance was r = 0.310*,with probability value (p = 0.000) that is less than α = 0.05 level of significance showing a significant effect between moderating variables and financial performance at the five percent level of significance. Therefore, it was found out that moderating variables significantly affects financial performance. Adjusted R square value was 0.079 implying that moderating variables predicts financial performance implying that financial performance is dependent on moderating variables by 7.9%.
JEL: G30, G38, H11, O18
Article visualizations:
Literaturhinweise
Allen (2009) Allen, Franklin, Gale, Douglas, 2004, Competition and financial stability, Journal of Money, Credit, Banking, Vol. 36, 433–480.
Allen, E. & Maghimbi, S. (2009) African cooperatives and the financial crisis; Coop Africa Working Paper No.3
AMFIU Report (2008): Microfinance Tomorrow: Refocusing the vision for the Industry in Uganda; An Analytical booklet for the proceedings of the 2008 AMFIU Pre-AGM Workshop.
Central Bank of Kenya (2002). Quarterly Economic Report: Commercial Banking Activities. June 2002 Vol.02/2002.
Chiang, Hsiang-tsai. (2005). Empirical study of corporate governance and corporate performance. The Journal of Law and Economics, 31, (1) 122-140.
Cohen, J., Krishnamurthy G. and Wright, A. M. (2004), “Corporate governance mosaic and financial reporting”, Journal of Accounting Literature, Vol. 23, pp. 87-152.
Dominic O. O., Florence M. (2015), ’Effect of corporate governance practices on the financial performance of public limited companies in Kenya’, International journal of management and commerce innovations, Vol. 3, issue 1 pp. 122-132
Fama, E., 1980, “Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm", Journal of Political Economy 88, 288-307.
Fama, E. F., Jensen, M. C. 1983. Agency Problems and Residual Claims. Journal of Law & Economics, 26: 327-350.
Jensen, M. (1993), The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit and the Failure of Internal Control Systems, The Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831–880.
Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (2010) Report on financial performance of companies in Kenya.
Kenya Yearbook, 2013/14.
Linyiru. B. M. (2006) Survey of corporate governance practices in banks in Kenya. Unpublished MBA project. School of Business, University of Nairobi.
National Housing Policy for Kenya 2004 Sessional paper no.3.
OECD REPORT (2008) on Tax and Economic Growth in OECD Countries. Washington DC
Rogers, M. (2006). Corporate Governance and financial performance of selected commercial banks in Uganda. Marketers University Business School. Faculty of Commerce. East Africa: Kampala, Uganda
The constitution of Kenya (2010), Government printing press.
The Government of Kenya (2004), Cooperative Development Policy, Government printing press.
UN Habitat (2010) The Organization, Management and Finance of Housing Co-operatives in Kenya. Washington D.C. United Nations Human Settlements Programme.
Warner, J., R. Watts and K.H. Wruck, 1988, "Stock Prices and Top Management Changes", Journal of Financial Economics 20, 461-492.
World Council of Credit Unions (WOCCU), Report 2002.Washington DC
World Council of Credit Unions (WOCCU), Statistics report 2005. Washington DC
Zeitun, R. & Tian G. G. (2007) “Capital structure and corporate Performance: Evidence from Jordan “Australasian Accounting Business and Finance Journal, Vol. 1 Issue 4, Article 3.
