CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, MACRO ENVIRONMENT, TOP MANAGEMENT CAPABILITIES AND PERFORMANCE OF COMMERCIAL STATE CORPORATIONS IN KENYA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejefr.v10i2.2179Palabras clave:
corporate governance, macro environment, top management capabilities, performance, commercial state corporations, KenyaResumo
Purpose: This study investigates the influence of corporate governance, macro environment, and top management capabilities on the performance of commercial state corporations in Kenya. Motivated by persistent performance challenges within state-owned enterprises, the research aimed to provide a holistic understanding of internal and external factors that drive organizational success. An integrated conceptual model was developed and tested using data collected through structured questionnaires administered to top-level managers across various commercial state corporations. The study was theoretically anchored in Agency Theory, Stewardship Theory, Upper Echelons Theory, and Resource Dependency Theory. Methodology: The variables considered in this paper are corporate governance conceptualized as an independent variable and anchored on agency theory, macro environment as the moderating variable supported by steward theory, top management capabilities as the intervening variable, anchored on upper echelon theory and performance as the dependent variable. The study used a descriptive research design and a positivist worldview. A semi-structured questionnaire was administered to 47 commercial state corporations. The data was analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, notably Pearson's Product-Moment Correlation and multiple regression analysis for hypotheses. Findings: The study established that collectively and individually, corporate governance, macro environment, and top management capabilities positively and statistically influence commercial state corporations in Kenya.
JEL: G34, E02, M12, L25, L32
Citas
Adekunle, O. A., & Olowe, O. S. (2023). Inflation and firm profitability: Evidence from Nigerian listed firms. Economic Modelling, 124,
Ali, M., & Wei, L. (2019). The impact of institutional environment on corporate governance and firm performance: Evidence from Asia-Pacific. Journal of Asian Economics, 65.
Bae, John, Sang-Joon Kim, and Hannah Oh. (2018). Taming polysemous signals: The role of marketing intensity on the relationship between financial leverage and firm performance. Review of Financial Economics 33: 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rfe.2016.12.002
Bathula, H., & Singh, D. (2015). Ownership concentration, board characteristics and firm performance. Management Decision, 53(5), 911-931. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-08-2014-0519
Bhagat, S. & B. Black (2002). The Non-Correlation between Board Independence and Long-Term Company Performance, The Journal of Corporation Law, Vol 27, No 2
Bhagat, S., & Bolton, B. (2019). Corporate governance and long-term firm value: A comprehensive analysis. International Review of Finance, 20(4), 455–478. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=133808
Ehsan, S. (2019). Corporate social responsibility: measurement, and its nexus with earnings management and corporate governance, Doctoral dissertation, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Islamabad.
Gatamah, K. (2002). The corporate enterprise in Africa: Governance, citizenship and social responsibility. Corporate Ownership and Control 1(3) p. 139-144. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv1i3p13
Government Owned Entities Bill. (2014). Government of Kenya.
Gudergan, S. P., & Wilden, R. (2018). Top management capabilities, dynamic capabilities, and organizational performance: An empirical investigation. Strategic Management Review, 14(2), 95–118
Gupta, A. K. (2020). Analyzing macro-environmental factors: A comprehensive PESTEL framework. Journal of Strategic Management Insights, 8(1), 1–15.
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers. The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 9, No. 2, p. 193-206. https://doi.org/10.2307/258434
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The Balanced Scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71–79. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/1992/01/the-balanced-scorecard-measures-that-drive-performance-2
Khan, M. T., & Rasheed, A. (2021). Does macroeconomic environment moderate the governance-performance link? Evidence from emerging economies. Emerging Markets Review, 48.
Mohammed, A. M., Idris, K. A., & Suleiman, H. A. (2023). Governance quality and firm financial performance: A cross-country empirical assessment. Journal of Finance and Economic Development, 9(1), 33–51.
Otieno, J. M. (2020). Enterprise risk management, top management development, and macro-environmental influences on performance in state-owned enterprises in Kenya. Journal of Public Sector Management Research, 5(2), 88–104.
Puni, A., & Alex A. (2020). Corporate governance mechanisms and firm performance in a developing country. International Journal of Law and Management 62: 147–69. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-03-2019-0076
Salehi, M., DashtBayaz, M. L., & Moghadam, S. M. (2018). The relationship between management characteristics and firm innovation. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 67(7), 1113-1131. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-05-2017-0126
Shah, S. Z. A., Javed, H., & Iqbal, A. (2023). Corporate governance, macroeconomic conditions, and firm performance: Evidence from emerging markets. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 23(2), 348-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.08.004
Tanjung, A. R. (2019). Corporate governance mechanisms and firm performance: Evidence from emerging markets. Journal of Corporate Governance Studies, 12(3), 210–224. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-07-2018-0244
Tarawneh, M. (2006). A Comparison of Financial Performance in the Banking Sector: Some Evidence from Omani Commercial Banks. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 3, 101-112.
Van der Colff, L. (2003). Leadership lessons from the African tree. Management Decision, 41(3), 257-261. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740310468063


