STUDY OF THE ROLE OF THE CONSULTING ENGINEER IN THE RISK MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS BASED ON FIDIC CONTRACTS

Autores/as

  • Aliaksandr Razgonau First Deputy Chairman of the NGO, Belarussian Association of Consulting Engineers, Minsk, Belarus orcid.org/0009-0008-0408-6581

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejefr.v10i3.2226

Palabras clave:

FIDIC, consulting engineer, risk management, construction projects, contract administration, dispute prevention

Resumo

The article examines the significance of the consulting engineer within the risk management system in the implementation of construction projects based on FIDIC contracts. It is established that within a risk-oriented management model, this participant performs not only the tasks of technical supervision and contract administration, but also contributes to the prevention of adverse events, the allocation of responsibilities between the parties, and the procedural resolution of emerging disagreements. Using examples of infrastructure projects, it is shown that the effectiveness of such participation depends both on the chosen contractual framework and on the degree of formalization of project procedures. The paper analyzes the powers of the consulting engineer and highlights the importance of their involvement in coordinating changes, documenting contract-relevant circumstances, and reducing the likelihood of disputes.

JEL: K12, L74, D81

Biografía do autor/a

  • Aliaksandr Razgonau, First Deputy Chairman of the NGO, Belarussian Association of Consulting Engineers, Minsk, Belarus orcid.org/0009-0008-0408-6581

    Razgonau Aliaksandr, First Deputy Chairman of the NGO, Belarussian Association of Consulting Engineers, Minsk, Belarus.

    ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0408-6581

    Email: a.razgonov@internet.ru

Citas

Cheng G, Luo D, 2025. Dynamic adaptive mechanism for construction investment decision-making under multi-factor interactions: risk-oriented modelling framework with pathways to digital twin. Digital Twin. https://doi.org/10.1080/27525783.2025.2570262

KPMG, 2026. The paradox of progress. https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmgsites/dk/pdf/dk-2026/march/dk-global-construction-survey-2025-2026.pdf.coredownload.inline.pdf. Accessed 6 March 2026

AGC, 2025. 2025 Workforce Survey Analysis. https://www.agc.org/sites/default/files/users/user21902/2025%20Workforce%20Survey%20Analysis%20%283%29.pdf. Accessed 6 March 2026

Arcadis, 2025. Arcadis Construction Disputes Report 2025 – Construction Disputes in Motion: Speed, Agility and Adapting to Change. https://www.arcadis.com/en/expertise/contract-solutions. Accessed 7 March 2026.

Ojo DA, 2025. A data-driven framework for project risk monitoring using decision intelligence and predictive analytics. Journal of Management and Development Research 2(2): 125-136. https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7432-3792

Abdelalim A, Hassanen M, ElSamadony A, 2024. Risk allocation and sharing in mega industrial projects from the perspective of the New Yellow Book-FIDIC-2017 to approach a balanced construction contract. Trans. Mach. Learn. Artif. Intell. 12: 54-102.

Cho H, Jung W, Park CY, 2025. Knowledge-driven claim governance: A checklist of entitlements and procedures in FIDIC and national standard contracts. Buildings 15(21): 3955. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15213955

Nwogu PC, Emedosi A, 2024. FIDIC form of contract: A study review. British Journal of Environmental Sciences 12(2): 43-48. https://doi.org/10.37745/bjes.2013/vol12n24348

Naidenova M, 2025. Automated procurement system in construction based on ERP (1C), EDI, and BIM: architecture, integration principles, and managerial impact. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture Engineering 6(2B): 85-90. doi: 10.22271/27078361.2025.v6.i2b.80

Volpe Center, 2025. Understanding Construction Change Orders. https://www.volpe.dot.gov/sites/volpe.dot.gov/files/2025-01/Understanding%20

Construction%20Change%20Orders%20Report%20v01-16-2025_508%20compliant%

final.pdf. Accessed 9 March 2026.

Alheilat OM, Alomran NM, 2024. Contemporary methods of resolving disputes arising from FIDIC construction contracts between the employer and contractor. Krytyka Prawa: 258. Retrieved from https://repozytorium.kozminski.edu.pl/server/api/core/bitstreams/11852a9f-2cf2-4099-9e0b-8366980a8b3e/content

Younis REA, Abdelkhalek H, Abdelalim AM, 2023. Project risk management during construction stage according to international contract (FIDIC). Int. J. Civ. Struct. Eng. Res. 10: 76-93.

EBRD, 2026. Belarus: Minsk Vodokanal Project. https://ecepp.ebrd.com/delta/viewNotice.html?displayNoticeId=11405147. Accessed 10 March 2026

European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, 2026. Regional Bridges and M3 Road Rehabilitation. https://www.ebrd.com/home/work-with-us/projects/psd/51090.html. Accessed 10 March 2026

WSDOT, 2026. Cost risk assessment. https://wsdot.wa.gov/engineering-standards/project-management-training/project-management/cost-risk-assessment. Accessed 10 March 2026

SANDAG, 2026. Mid-Coast Trolley. https://www.sandag.org/projects-and-programs/transit/transit-projects/mid-coast-trolley. Accessed 10 March 2026.

Lapidus A, Topchiy D, Kuzmina T, Shevchenko IA, 2023. New direction of professional activity of consulting engineers in the construction industry. Buildings 13(7): 1674. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071674

Alhasan TK, 2026. Engineer’s determination under FIDIC Red Book 2017: Navigating ethical tensions between neutrality and loyalty. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction 18(2). https://doi.org/10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-1456

Descargas

Publicada

2026-05-28

Número

Sección

Articles