THE MODERATING EFFECT OF OWNERSHIP CONCENTRATION ON DIVIDEND PAYMENTS AND FIRM VALUE: THE CASE FOR NAIROBI SECURITIES EXCHANGE

著者

  • Anthony Muriungi Department of Finance and Accounting, School of Business and Economics, Meru University of Science and Technology, Kenya
  • Kennedy Okiro Department of Finance and Accounting, Faculty of Business and Management Sciences, University of Nairobi, Kenya
  • Herick Ondigo Department of Finance and Accounting, Faculty of Business and Management Sciences, University of Nairobi, Kenya
  • Mary Kinoti Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Business and Management Sciences, University of Nairobi, Kenya

##doi.readerDisplayName##:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejefr.v9i1.1949

キーワード:

ownership concentration、 dividend payment、 firm value

要旨

Empirical studies exploring the relationship between dividend policy, ownership concentration, and firm value have presented mixed findings. Several studies have explored this relationship across different contexts and markets, resulting in diverse and sometimes contradictory conclusions. One of the aspects of corporate ownership and management theory that researchers have increasingly focused on is the influence of large shareholders on value-creating metrics. The objective of this paper was to examine the effect of dividend payment on firm value and the moderating effect of ownership concentration on the dividend payment and firm value relationship at the Nairobi Securities Exchange. Dividend signalling and shareholder monitoring hypotheses were the key theories supporting this study. The study utilised longitudinal data for 2008-2017, the target population was sixty-six companies trading securities at the NSE in that period. Empirical results reveal that dividend payment has a positive effect on the firm value, which supports the signalling hypothesis, and ownership concentration negatively moderated the relationship between dividend payment and firm value, this implies that firms with high ownership concentration will not be affected by the changes in the amount of dividends, alternatively, firms with dispersed ownership will be negatively affected if they reduce the amount of dividends. Regular payment of dividends ensures that dominant shareholders don’t disadvantage minority investors. Policymakers should consider stricter regulations and enforcement to ensure that large shareholders do not exploit their control at the expense of minority shareholders. Enhancing investor education and awareness can empower minority shareholders better to understand their rights and the implications of dividend policies. This study recommends that the regulatory body enforce stronger transparency measures to ensure dividends remain an effective signal of firm performance.

JEL: G14; G32; G35

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

著者略歴

  • Anthony Muriungi、 Department of Finance and Accounting, School of Business and Economics, Meru University of Science and Technology, Kenya

    Anthony Muriungi, lecturer in the School of Business and Economics at Meru University of Science and Technology Kenya, has research experience in corporate governance and international business, holds a Bachelor’s degree in Economics and Sociology from University of Nairobi (Kenya), a Master’s in Business Administration in international Business from University of Nairobi (Kenya), and is currently pursuing his Ph.D. in Business Administration at the University of Nairobi. Areas of interest are financial markets, entrepreneurship finance, and international business.

  • Kennedy Okiro、 Department of Finance and Accounting, Faculty of Business and Management Sciences, University of Nairobi, Kenya

    Dr. Kennedy Okiro, Lecturer, Department of Finance and Accounting, University of Nairobi, Areas of interest: financial markets and institutions, financial management, forensic accounting.

  • Herick Ondigo、 Department of Finance and Accounting, Faculty of Business and Management Sciences, University of Nairobi, Kenya

    Dr. Herick Ondigo, Senior Lecturer, Department of Finance and Accounting, University of Nairobi, areas of interest: capital market efficiency, corporate governance, mergers and divestitures, risk management.

  • Mary Kinoti、 Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Business and Management Sciences, University of Nairobi, Kenya

    Professor Mary W Kinoti, Associate Professor of Strategic Sales, Marketing and Branding, Faculty of Business and Management Sciences, University of Nairobi, Areas of interest: green marketing, sustainable development and marketing.

参考文献

Abdul, R. & Masdar, M. (2015). Effect of ownership structure, company size, and profitability on dividend policy in the Indonesian Stock Exchange. Australian Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences 9, no. 20, pp. 618.

Aduda, J., Ronald C. & Magutu O. (2013). An empirical test of competing corporate governance theories on the performance of firms listed at the Nairobi Securities Exchange. European Scientific Journal 9, no. 13, https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:55619027

Baron, R. & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51, no. 6, pp. 1173, DOI:10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173

Demsetz, H. & Lehn, K. (1985). The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy 93, no. 6, pp. 1155. DOI:10.1086/261354 Corpus ID: 24932776

Durbin, J. & Watson, S (1951). Testing for Serial Correlation in Least Squares Regression. II. Biometrika 38, no. 1-2, pp.159-178, 1951. https://doi.org/10.2307/2332325.

Genc, A. & Angelo, P. (2012). Ownership concentration and effects on firm performance: Evidence from Italy. European Scientific Journal 8, no. 22.

Georgeta, V. & Ştefan, C. (2014). The impact of ownership concentration on firm value. Empirical study of the Bucharest Stock Exchange-listed companies. Procedia Economics and Finance 15, pp. 271-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00500-0

Gordon, J. (1959). Dividends, earnings, and stock prices. The review of economics and statistics 99-105, 1959. https://doi.org/10.2307/1927792.

Gugler, K. & Yurtoglu, B. (2003). Corporate governance and dividend payout policy in Germany. European Economic Review 47, no. 4, pp. 731-758. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(02)00291-X.

Jensen, M. (1986). Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers. The American Economic Review 76, no. 2, 323–29. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1818789.

Jensen, M. & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3, no. 4, pp. 305-360. https://nbnresolving.org/urn:nbn:de:hebis:30-1122352

Khan, T. (2006). Company dividends and ownership structure: Evidence from UK panel data. The Economic Journal 116, no. 510, C172-C189.

Kiruri, R. (2013). The effects of ownership structure on bank profitability in Kenya. European Journal of Management Sciences and Economics 1, no. 2 pp.116-127.

Kisavi, M., Mukras, S. & Oginda, M. (2013). Ownership concentration and financial performance of listed firms in Kenya: An econometric analysis using panel data. European Scientific Journal 9, no. 28.

Lintner, J. (1956). Distribution of incomes of corporations among dividends, retained earnings, and taxes. The American Economic Review 46, no. 2, 97-113.

López-Iturriaga, Félix J. & Rodríguez-Sanz, J. (2012). Ownership structure, financial decisions, and institutional setting: an international analysis through simultaneous equations. Economics Research International, no. 465265, 1-12.https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/465265.

Luke, K. & Nathan, K. (2006). Dynamic models for dynamic theories: The ins and outs of lagged dependent variables. Political analysis 14, no. 2, 186-205. DOI:10.1093/pan/mpj006.

Maddala, G. & Rao, A. (1973). Tests for serial correlation in regression models with lagged dependent variables and serially correlated errors. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 41, no. 4, 761-774. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1914095.

Modigliani, F., & Merton M. (1961). Dividend policy, growth, and the valuation of shares. The Journal of Business 34, no. 4, pp. 411-433.

Nkobe, K., Simiyu, K. & Limo, K. (2013). Dividend policy and share price volatility in Kenya. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting 4, no. 6, pp. 115-120.

Ochieng, E. & Kinyua H. (2013). Relationship between inflation and dividend payout for companies listed at the Nairobi Securities Exchange. International Journal of Education and Research 1, no. 6, pp. 1-8, 2013. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325082780.

Ongore, V., K’Obonyo, P. & Ogutu, M. (2011). Implications of firm ownership identity and Managerial discretion on financial performance: empirical evidence from Nairobi Stock Exchange. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science 1, no.13, pp.187-195, 2011.

Shleifer, A. & Vishny R. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance 52, no. 2, pp. 737-783. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x.

Shleifer, A. & Vishny R. (1986). Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy 94, no. 3, Part 1 pp.461-488. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/261385

Thanatawee, Y. (2013). Ownership structure and dividend policy: Evidence from Thailand. International Journal of Economics and Finance 5, no. 1, pp.121-132. DOI:10.5539/ijef. v5n1p121

Hong & Nguyen, V. (2014). Managerial ownership, leverage and dividend policies: Empirical evidence from Vietnam’s listed firms. International Journal of Economics and Finance 6, no. 5, pp.274-284. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v6n5p274.

Yegon, C., Cheruiyot, J. & Sang, J. (2014). Effects of dividend policy on firm’s financial performance: Econometric analysis of listed manufacturing firms in Kenya. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting 5, no. 12, pp. 136-144.

ダウンロード

発行日

2025-05-19

巻号

巻 9 号 1 (2025)

セクション

Articles