EMPLOYEE PERSPECTIVE ON COMPANY LEADERS: BETWEEN DISCIPLINE AND JOB SATISFACTION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejhrms.v4i3.894Palavras-chave:
employee performance, job satisfaction, leadership, work disciplineResumo
The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of the role of leadership and work discipline on employee performance with job satisfaction as an intervening variable at PT. Sarana Arga Gemeh Amerta Denpasar. The sample in this study were employees of PT. Sarana Arga Gemeh Amerta Denpasar as many as 112 respondents. The analysis tool used is path analysis (path analysis). The results of the analysis explain that the leadership and work discipline variables have a positive and significant effect on employee performance, in addition to directly affecting employee performance, this variable is also influenced by job satisfaction as an intervening variable where it can be explained that job satisfaction as an intervening variable that connects leadership and work discipline variables has results. partially positive significant towards employee performance. This means that job satisfaction is not fully a benchmark in determining employee performance, because the results of this study state that the role of the leader in paying attention is needed by employees and work discipline becomes employee guidance in completing a job that is the responsibility of each employee.Referências
Bass, B. M. dan Avolio, 1990, “The Implications of Transaksional and Transformational”. Team and Organization Development, 4, p.231- 273.
Bass, B. M. dan Avolio, 1997, “Does the Transactional-Transformational Leadership Paradigm Transcend Organizational and National Boundaries?”, Journal American Psychologist. 52: 130-139.
Dubrin, Andrew J., 2006, “Leadership” (Terjemahan), Edisi Ketiga, Prenada Media: Jakarta.
Gito Sudarma, Sudita, 2000, “Perilaku Keorganisasian”. Edisi Pertama BPFE, Jogjyakarta.
Hasibuan, Melayu S. P. 2008, “Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia”, Jakarta: Penerbit Bumi Aksara.
Kartono, Karti. 2008. “Pemimpin dan Kepemimpinan”. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Locke, E. A., 1997, Esensi Kepemimpinan (Terjemahan). Mitra Utama, Jakarta.
Maharani, V., E. A. Troena., and Noermijati. 2013. Organizational Citizenship Behavior Role in Mediating the Effect of Transformational Leadership, Job Satisfaction on Employee Performance: Studies in PT Bank Syariah Mandiri Malang East Java. International Journal of Business and Management. Vol 8, No 17, pp. 1-12.
Mangkunegara, A. P., 2001. “Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan”. Edisi Baru, Remaja Resda Karya Bandung
Mathis, R. L., dan J. H. Jackson. 2009. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Edisi Kesepuluh. Alih Bahasa: Diana Angelica. Jakarta: Penerbit Salemba Empat.
McNeese-Smith, Dona, 1996, “Increasing Employee Productivity, Job Satisfaction, and Organizational Commitment”. Hospital and Health Services Journal Administration. Vol.41, No.2, pp.160-175.
Robbins, Stephen P. 2001. Perilaku Organisasi, Konsep, Kontroversi, Aplikasi. Edisi Kedelapan Jilid 1. Jakarta: PT Prenhalindo
Robbins, S. P., dan Judge. 2008. Perilaku Organisasi: Organizational Behaviour, Edisi 12. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Siagian P, Sondang. 2004. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Bumi Aksara Jakarta
Sugiyono. 2014. Metode Penelitian Bisnis, Cetakan ke-15. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Su’ud, Muh, 2000, “Persepsi Sosial Tentang Kredibilitas Pemimpin”. Sinergi Kajian Bisnis dan Manajemen. Vol.3, No.1. Hal 51-65.
Thoha, M., 2001, Kepemimpinan dalam Manajemen, Suatu Pendekatan Perilaku. Rajawali Press, Jakarta.
Wardana, 2008, “Meningkatkan Kinerja Melalui Evaluasi dan Coaching”. Medical Reps.
