CRITIQUE OF ANTI-ORGANIZATION THEORY BASED ON ITS PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATIONS (FUNDAMENTAL HUMANIST PARADIGM)
Parole chiave:
anti-organization theory, paradigm, functionalist paradigm, paradigm of fundamental humanism, interpretative paradigm, structural fundamentalism paradigmAbstract
The present article examines and criticizes anti-organization theory based on its philosophical foundations, which is found in the fundamental humanism paradigm; that a transient review is done on Borrel and Morgan's sociological paradigms (functionalism, interpretiveism, fundamentalist structuralism and fundamental humanism). The purpose of this article is to review the anti-organization theory and its viewpoint on organizational life and human resources and to describe the quadruple sociological paradigms. This theory acts in its own sphere of thought, and it must be said that it has a new look at the reality of organizational life and human resources. Finally, there is a review of the criticisms raised in the anti-organization theory about the organization's theory, which is in the form of a functional paradigm.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Azad Armaki. Taghi (2004), Theories of Sociology, Soroush, Tehran
Borille Gibson, Morgan. Garrot, (2014), Sociological and Sociological Theories and Organization Analysis, Translation: Nowruz. Mohammad Taghi, Publishing SAMT, Tehran
Castanda, C. (1970), The Teaching of Don Juan: A Yacqui Way of knowledge. Harmondsworth: Peguin.
Dilthey, W. (1967), Selected Writings (ed. H. P. Rickman). London: Cambridge University Press.
Ebrahim Pour. Habib (2006), The Philosophical Foundations of Organizational and Management Theories with Functional and Structuralist Approach, Management Culture, Qom, No. 13
Gibson, Bill. (2002), "An Essay on late Structuralism", Vermant University Press. www.uvm.edu
Gramesci, A. (1971), Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci (eds. Quinton Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell-Smith). London: Lawrence and Wishart.
Illich, I. (1973), Tools for Conviviality. London: Fontana/Collins.
Khaleqi. Amir Hossein (2012), An Investigation of Multidisciplinary and Sub-Paradigmatic Approaches to Organizational Studies, Development Management Process, Tehran, No 2
Laing, R.D. (1967), the Politics of Experience. New York: Ballantine.
Lukacs, G. (1971), History and Class Consciousness. London: Merlin. (First published 1923)
Marcuse, H. (1964), One Dimensional Man. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Marcuse, H. (1966), Eros and Civilization. Boston: Beacon.
Marcuse, H. (1968), Industrialisation and Capitalism in the Work of Max Weber’, negations: Essays in Critical Theory, op. cit.
Marcuse, H. (1968), Negations: Essays in Critical Theory. London: Heinemann.
Marx, K. (1975), Early Writings (trans. R. Livingstone and G. Benton). Harmondsworth: Penguin. (This contains Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts, 1844)
Mirzai Aharenjani, Hassan. (2014), The Philosophical Foundations of Organization Theory, Tehran, SAMT.
Morgan, G. (2006), Images of organization. Thousand oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage.
Parsons, T. (1951), the Social System. London: Tavistock; Glencoe, Ill: Free Press.
Ritzer, G. (2001), Explorations in Social Theory, From Metatheorizing to Rationalization. London: SAGE Publications.
Sartre, J. P. (1948), Existentialism ad Humanism (trans. P. Mairet). London: Methuen.
Tavasoli. Ghulam Abbas (2005), Sociology Theories, SAMT, Tehran
Webber, M. (1947), the Theory of Social and Economic Organization (trans. A. Henderson and T. Parsons), Glencoe, Ill: Free Press.
Zimmerman, D.H. (1970), the Practicalities of Rule Use, in J. D. Douglas, ed., Understanding Everyday Life, op. cit.
