PUBLIC POLICIES AND TERRITORIAL DIMENSION AS DETERMINANT COMPETITIVENESS FACTORS
Апстракт
Public policies, is the principled guide to action taken by the administrative executive branches of the state with regard to a class of issues, in a manner consistent with law and institutional customs. The competitiveness is the ability of a ' company, a public institution or a territory to provide competitive goods or services as well the ability to perform and resist on a competitive market. In the analysis of competitiveness is predominating the orientation towards reducing costs, in order to provide the market best possible price; in reality it is necessary to promote a different competitiveness, with emphasis on factors that generate development, and develop public policies from the territorial dimension, aimed at achieving competitiveness and local development.
Референци
Jam Masso, A. "Public policies to promote competitiveness". Diploma Competitiveness and Globalization. Havana.National Association of Economists and Accountants of Cuba (ANEC) / Research Center of International Economics (EIPC). Conference. (2008)
United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). Five pieces of production development policy. Santiago de Chile. United Nations. (2007).
Savas, E.S. 2000. Privatization and Public Private Partnerships. New York: Chatham House. Savas, E. S. 2002. Competition and Choice in New York City Social Services. Public Administration Review 62(1): 82-91.
Esser, K.; W. Hillebrand; D. Messner and J. Meyer-Stamer. "Systemic competitiveness: a new challenge for business and politics." CEPAL. No. 59. pp. 39-52.
Gulick, L. and L. Urwick. Papers on the Science of Public Administration. New York. Institute of Public Administration. (1937).
Hamel, G. and Prahalad CK. Competing for the future. Barcelona. Ariel. (1995)
Peres, W. "Policy competitiveness." CEPAL. No. 53. pp. 49-58. (1994, August).
Porter, ME The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Free Press. New York. (1990).
Silva Lira, I. "Local economic development and territorial competitiveness in
Latin America." CEPAL. No. 85. pp.81-100. (2005, April)
Vazquez-Barquero, A. "Endogenous development and globalization." Eure. Vol. XXVI. No. 79. pp. 47-65. (2000).
Savas, E. S. 2008, July. Public employees and public-private partnerships. HR News 74 (7): 6-7, 10.
Fay, M. and M. Morrison Infrastructure in Latin America and the Caribbean: Recent Developments and Key Challenges. Washington DC The World Bank. (2005).
Guerrero Orozco, O. Introduction to public administration in Mexico. Mexico DF Editorial Harlan Kentucky. (1985)
Alburquerque, F. Local economic development and dissemination of technical progress: a response to the demands of structural adjustment. Series Notebooks ILPES No. 43. Santiago de Chile. United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). (1997b)
Banon, R. and E. Carrillo. The new public administration. Madrid. Alianza Editorial. (1997).
Mintrom, Michael. 1997. Policy entrepreneurs and the diffusion of innovation. American Journal of Political Science 41 (3): 738-770.
Mintrom, Michael and Sandra Vergari. 1996. Advocacy coalitions, policy entrepreneurs and policy change. Policy Studies Journal 24 (3): 420-434
Alburquerque, F. Methodology for local economic development. Santiago de Chile. United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). (1997a)
Benito, AB "Liberalism and legal positivism." Journal of Public Administration. Vol. 35-36. pp. 141-151. (2002-2003).
Cohen, S. "Speaking Freely". Foreign Affairs. Vol. 73. No. 4. pp. 194-197. (1994).
United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). Productive development in open economies. Santiago de Chile. United Nations. (2004).
