RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE AND SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY IN KHAZAR UNIVERSITY, AZERBAIJAN
##semicolon##
social environment##common.commaListSeparator## organizational culture##common.commaListSeparator## organizational values##common.commaListSeparator## social responsibilityAbstrakt
The purpose of the article is to determine the relationship between organizational culture and social responsibility in Khazar University, Azerbaijan. The population of the study comprises management employees, faculty staff and students as well as representatives of neighborhood associations. The results show that there is a directly proportional relationship between the moderate elements of culture and social responsibility of university under study; a situation which explains the strong positive relationship. Considering these findings, a number of strategic guidelines suggested addressed to four categories: performance, education, and social cognitive and epistemological. It was concluded that there are deficiencies in the presence of elements such as beliefs, values, rituals, language and history; aspects which contributes on reflecting the staff perception toward a moderately weak corporate culture.
##submission.citations##
Perrow, C. (1986). Complex organizations: A critical essay (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
French, J. R. P., Jr., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150-167). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2 ed.). New York: Wile
McGregor, D. M. (1960). The human side of enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hofstede, Geert, Gert Jan Hofstede and Michael Minkov.Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. 2010
Chiavenato, Idalberto (2000). Human Resource Management. 5th Edition Colombia
Shein, Edgar (1992). Organizational Culture and Leadership: A Dynamic View. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Gallo, Miguel (2000). The company, management and administration. Superior business management course. Volume 3. Place Editores, SA University of Navarra
Guédez, Victor (2006). Ethics and practice of Corporate Social Responsibility. The contribution of the company to the capital. Collection Management Issues. Editorial Planeta Venezuela Venezolana SA
Thompson, Arthur and Strickland, A. (2004). Strategic Management. Editorial Mc Graw-Hill. Mexico
Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: John Wiley.
Maslow, A. H. (1943). "A theory of human motivation". Psychological Review 50: 370–396.
Greenberg, J (1987). "A taxonomy of organizational justice theories". Academy of Management Review 12: 9–22.
Herzberg, F. (1968, January/February). One more time: How do you motivate employees? Harvard Business Review, 52-62.
Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA, England: Lexington Books/D C Heath and Com.f
Milocco, M. (2003). Green Paper. European Union
Robbins, Stephen (2004). Organizational Behavior. Prentice-Hall, Mexico
Bateman, Thomas and Snell, Scott (2001). Administration. A Competitive Advantage. 4th Edition, Mc Mexico. Graw Hill
Collins, James and Porras, Jerry (2000) . Companies that endure. Basic Principles of visionary companies.Paidós, Barcelona
Greenhaus, J. H.; Beutell, N. J. (1985). "Sources and conflict between work and family roles". Academy of Management Review 10 (1): 76–88.
