THE ROLE OF INFORMAL CONNECTIONS IN REALIZING RIGHTS FOR INDONESIAN CITIZENS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejsss.v9i6.1695Keywords:
informality of citizenship, informal connections, citizens' rightsAbstract
This article aims to analyze the role of informal connections as a form of community citizenship informality in Sidomulyo Hamlet RW 003 Sumberberas Village, Muncar District, Banyuwangi Regency, in an effort to realize the rights of citizens in Indonesia. The method used is library research, where activities such as reading, taking notes, processing or reviewing written references in books, journals or other research, which are connected to civic phenomena occurring in society, will be carried out. This study produces findings that citizenship is described as various formal and informal aspects of civic engagement as a depiction of citizens' interactions with the state. The context of informality, which in this study is described as the personal social connections of citizens, is one way to accelerate public virtue which is not limited to a negative perspective, but can also be directed into a more positive aspect.
Article visualizations:
References
Aliyev, H. (2015). Examining the use of informal networks by NGOs in Azerbaijan and Georgia. Journal of Civil Society, 11(3), 317–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2015.1069524
Asen, R. (2004). A discourse theory of citizenship. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 90(2), 189–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/0033563042000227436
Bandelli, A., & Konijn, E. A. (2015). Public participation and scientific citizenship in the science museum in London: Visitors’ perceptions of the museum as a broker. Visitor Studies, 18(2), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645578.2015.1079089
Berenschot, W., Hanani, R., & Sambodho, P. (2018). Brokers and citizenship: Access to health care in Indonesia. Citizenship Studies, 22(2), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2018.1445493
Berenschot, W., & van Klinken, G. (2018). Informality and citizenship: The everyday state in Indonesia. Citizenship Studies, 22(2), 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2018.1445494
Boone, K., Roets, G., & Roose, R. (2019). Social work, participation, and poverty. Journal of Social Work, 19(3), 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017318760789
Coe, C. A. (2015). ‘Civilized city’: How embedded civil society networks frame the debate on urban green space in Hanoi, Vietnam. Asian Journal of Communication, 25(6), 617–635. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2015.1023321
Cvetičanin, P., Popovikj, M., & Jovanović, M. (2019). Informality in the Western Balkans: A culture, a contextual rational choice, or both? Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 19(4), 585–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2019.1692427
Dermaut, V., Schiettecat, T., Vandevelde, S., & Roets, G. (2020a). Citizenship, disability rights and the changing relationship between formal and informal caregivers: It takes three to tango. Disability & Society, 35(2), 280–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2019.1634521
Dermaut, V., Schiettecat, T., Vandevelde, S., & Roets, G. (2020b). Citizenship, disability rights and the changing relationship between formal and informal caregivers: It takes three to tango. Disability & Society, 35(2), 280–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2019.1634521
Dewi, S. A. E. (2021). Komunikasi Publik Terkait Vaksinasi Covid 19. HEALTH CARE : Jurnal Kesehatan, 10(1), 162–167. https://doi.org/10.36763/healthcare.v10i1.119
Díez, J., Gatt, S., & Racionero, S. (2011). Placing Immigrant and Minority Family and Community Members at the School’s Centre: The role of community participation: European Journal of Education, Part I. European Journal of Education, 46(2), 184–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2011.01474.x
Estes, K. W. (2023). Whose ties still ibnd? Ethnic domination, informal social networks, and public goods provision in Kyrgyzstan. Problems of Post-Communism, 70(1), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2021.1894176
Ezell, M., & Gibson, J. W. (1990). The Impact of informal social networks on the elderly’s need for services. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 14(3–4), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1300/J083V14N03_02
Fales, S. (2018). Fungsi partai politik dalam meningkatkan partisipasi politik ditinjau dari hukum positif. AL IMARAH : Junal Pemerintahan dan Politik Islam, 3(2), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.29300/imr.v3i2.2152
Fisher, R. J. (1972). Third party consultation: A method for the study and resolution of conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 16(1), 67–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200277201600105
Iskandar, D. (2016). Keberadaan partai politik yang tidak diketahui menelusuri fungsi partai politik di Indonesia pasca Soeharto. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan, 2(1), 26–37.
Jaskiewicz, P., Uhlenbruck, K., Balkin, D. B., & Reay, T. (2013). Is nepotism good or bad? Types of nepotism and implications for knowledge management. Family Business Review, 26(2), 121–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486512470841
Kelly, J. G. (1989). Chapter 4: Identifying the informal social networks that enhance the development of social competencies. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 6(1), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1300/J293v06n01_07
Li, Y. (2016). Social mobility, social network and subjective well-being in the UK. Contemporary Social Science, 11(2–3), 222–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2016.1190860
Marshall, T. H., & Bottomore, T. (2015). Citizenship and Social Class. Pluto Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt18mvns1
Newman, J., Barnes, M., Sullivan, H., & Knops, A. (2004). Public participation and collaborative governance. Journal of Social Policy, 33(2), 203–223. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279403007499
Oyedemi, T. (2015). Internet access as citizen’s right? Citizenship in the digital age. Citizenship Studies, 19(3–4), 450–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2014.970441
Padgett, M. Y., Padgett, R. J., & Morris, K. A. (2015). Perceptions of nepotism beneficiaries: The hidden price of using a family connection to obtain a job. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(2), 283–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-014-9354-9
Polese, A. (2023). What is informality? (Mapping) “the art of bypassing the state” in Eurasian spaces - and beyond. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 64(3), 322–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2021.1992791
Rosana, E. (2015). Konflik pada kehidupan masyarakat (telaah mengenai teori dan penyelesaian konflik pada masyarakat modern). Al-Adyan: Jurnal Studi Lintas Agama, 10(2), 216–230.
Schmid, A., & Sender, A. (2021). How social capital influences performance in family firms: The moderating role of nepotism. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(18), 3973–3993. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2019.1674355
Shatkin, G., & Soemarwi, V. (2021). Risk and the dialectic of state informality: Property rights in flood-prone Jakarta. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 111(4), 1183–1199. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2020.1799744
Sofiah, R., Suhartono, S., & Hidayah, R. (2020). Analisis karakteristik sains teknologi masyarakat (STM) sebagai model pembelajaran: sebuah studi literatur. Pedagogi: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 7(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.25134/pedagogi.v7i1.2611
Supriyadi, S. (2016). Community of practitioners: Solusi alternatif berbagi pengetahuan antar pustakawan. Lentera Pustaka: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Perpustakaan, Informasi Dan Kearsipan, 2(2), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.14710/lenpust.v2i2.13476
Turner, B. S. (1997). Citizenship studies: A general theory. Citizenship Studies, 1(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621029708420644
Willem, V. D. M. (2018). Forest conflicts and the informal nature of realizing indigenous land rights in Indonesia. Citizenship Studies, 22(2), 160–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2018.1445495
Witcher, A., & Fumado, V. (2022). Informal citizen volunteering with border crossers in Greece: The informality double-bind and intimate solidarity. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 48(17), 4049–4065. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2021.1970517
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang pemilihan umum.


