THE IMPACT OF THE NUCLEAR FAMILY IN THE ESTABLISHMENT OF GENDER ROLES IN CHILDREN BETWEEN 3 AND 7 YEARS AGE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejsss.v0i0.87Parole chiave:
nuclear family, gender role, gender discriminationAbstract
The family is the foundation of society. Without it, there would be no development, prosperity and continuity of life. The influence of family affects our life including the development of gender roles in children aged 3-7 years. Family Education is the basis of any subsequent education, because personality and personal identity is formed there. Family also plays an important role in the socialization of gender roles in the ways they organize the environment for the child. This study aims to address the impact of the nuclear family, on the formation of the concept of gender roles as well as gender discrimination for boys and girls aged 3-7 years. We have used the qualitive method, through which we aim to highlight how do parents with their behavior influence the formation of gender roles, by including each other in activities of daily life and engagement in the division of housework. The purpose of this study is to explore the impact of the nuclear family in the formation of gender identity in children aged 3-7 years old in Albanian society. The study was conducted in the city of Elbasan. The findings of this study were identified from the viewpoint of couples who have children of both sexes. From data analysis, we have concluded that the nuclear family has great influence on the formation of gender roles of boys and girls aged 3-7 years. Men were seen as more focused and directed in the public area, while women in the private sphere. The impacts in the formation of gender roles were seen from the difference in colors, toys and children activities - activities for boys and activities for girls.
Article visualizations:
Riferimenti bibliografici
Akil Pano, May 27 2014, http://www.panorama.com.al/sfida-e-integrimit-te-familjes-shqiptare
Basow, S. A. (1980). Sex-Role Stereotypes: Traditions and Alternatives. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3270818
David Reed Shaffer, Teena Willoughby, Eileen Wood. (2002). Developmental Psychology: Childhood and Adolescence. USA.
Kaplan. (2000). Kaplan Gre Exam 2000 2001. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-Efficacy in Changing Societies. California: Stanford University.
M, T. J. (1974). Variability of growth and maturity in newborn infants. New York.
Martyn D. Barrett, Eithne Buchanan-Barrow. (2005). Children's Understanding of Society. UK: Psychology Press.
Shaffer, D. R. (2009). Social and Personality Development. University of Georgia: Wadsworth.
Creswell. (2012). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Lincoln: Sage Publication.
Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Richard M. Grinnell, Y. A. (2011). Social Work Research and Evaluation: Foundations of Evidence-Based Practice. England: Oxford University Press.
Malterud, R. (2001). Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Manchester: J and M.
Vincent A. Anfara, J. N. (2014). Theoretical Frameworks in Qualitative Research. Sage Publication.
Schram, T. H. (2003). Conceptualizing Qualitative Inquiry: Mindwork for Fieldwork in Education and the Social Sciences. Virginia: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
Linda Dale Bloomberg, M. V. (2005). Completing Your Qualitative Dissertation: A Road Map from Beginning to End. Sage Publications.
Ross, M. a. (2011). The Health Study Companion. British Library.
Elaine Chan, D. K. (2012). Narrative Inquirers in the Midst of Meaning-making: Interpretive Acts Teacher Educators. United Kingdom: Howard House.
Grieshaber, S. (2004). Rethinking Parent and Child Conflict. New York: Routledge Falmer.
Margaret Anzul, Margot Ely, Teri Freidman, Diane Garner, Ann McCormack-Steinmetz. (2003). Doing Qualitative Research: Circles Within Circles. Sage Publications.
