APPLICATION OF THE MODEL 5E TO DESIGN A TEACHING PLAN FOR THE TOPIC “WHAT ARE THE CHARACTERISTICS OF WATER?” IN 4TH GRADE SCIENCE SUBJECT OF VIETNAM IN STEM EDUCATIONAL ORIENTATION
##doi.readerDisplayName##:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejsss.v8i4.1426キーワード:
STEM、 STEM education、 teaching plan、 the model 5E、 primary school students、 science subject要旨
STEM education is an educational model based on the interdisciplinary integration of science, technology, engineering and mathematics to solve real-life problems (Bentley et al., 2022; Kaleci & Korkmaz, 2018). When implementing STEM education in primary schools, there are many different approaches: discovery model, engineering design model, 5E, 6E, TRIAL model (Chacko et al., 2015; Kaleci & Korkmaz, 2018; Matsuura & Nakamura, 2021; Stohlmann et al., 2012). The selection of a model to apply appropriately is important, depending on the student, the actual teaching conditions, the teaching content, etc. The article analyzes the content of Science in primary school, teaching practice in Vietnam and illustrates the design of a specific teaching plan for grade 4 students on the basis of applying the model 5E to organize STEM education-oriented teaching in order to provide teachers with an approach when designing science teaching plans for primary school students.
Article visualizations:
参考文献
Aguilera, D., & Ortiz-Revilla, J. (2021). Stem vs. Steam education and student creativity: A systematic literature review. Education Sciences, 11(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070331
Atkin, J. M., & Karplus, R. (1962). Discovery or invention? The Science Teacher, 29(5), 45-51.
Bentley, B., Sieben, R., & Unsworth, P. (2022). STEM Education in Australia: Impediments and Solutions in Achieving a STEM-Ready Workforce. In Education Sciences (Vol. 12, Issue 10). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100730
Bircan, M. A., & Çalışıcı, H. (2022). The Effects of STEM Education Activities on Fourth Grade Students’ Attitudes to Stem, 21st-Century Skills and Mathematics Success. Egitim ve Bilim, 47(211), 87–119. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2022.10710
Bybee, R. W. (2014). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Personal reflections and contemporary implications. Science and Children, 51(8), 10-13.
Chacko, P., Appelbaum, S., Kim, H., Zhao, J., & Montclare, J. K. (2015). Integrating technology in stem education. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 5(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.124
Cho, B. &. (2013 (1)). The effects of creativity and flow on learning through the steam education on elementary school contexts. 한국교육공학회 학술대회발표자료집, 206- 210. Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Effects-of-Creativity-and-Flow-on-Learning-the-Cho-Lee/64a30434fc55afec1743973f755dae7ff8363095
Çiğdem Şahin, Ümmü Gülsüm Durukan, & Elif Arıkurt (2017). Effect of 5E teaching Model on Primary School Pre- Service Teachers’ learning on Some Astronomy concepts. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(2), 148–162.
Daugherty, M. K. (2013). The prospect of an “A” in STEM education. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 14(2), 10-15.
Homa, A. I. R. (2019). Robotics simulators in STEM education. Acta Scientiae, 21(5), 178–191. https://doi.org/10.17648/ACTA.SCIENTIAE.5417
Kaleci, D., & Korkmaz, Ö. (2018). STEM education research: Content analysis. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(11), 2404–2412. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.061102
María, Soledad Ramírez, M. (2017). Driving STEM Learning with Educational Technologies. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books?id=aB4UDgAAQBAJ&printsec=copyright&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Matsuura, T., & Nakamura, D. (2021). Trends in STEM/STEAM Education and Students’ Perceptions in Japan. In Asia-Pacific Science Education (Vol. 7, Issue 1, pp. 7–33). Brill Rodopi. https://doi.org/10.1163/23641177-bja10022
Ministry of Education and Training. (2018). Education Program in Science
Ministry of Education and Training. (2018a). General Education Program 2018, Master Program.
Ministry of Education and Training. (2018b). General education program in Nature and Society.
Morrison, J. (2006). TIES STEM education monograph series: Attributes of STEM education. Baltimore MD: TIES.
Pratama, R. A., Pratiwi, I. M., Saputra, M. A., & Sumargono. (2022). Integration of STEM education in history learning. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 11(1), 313–320. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i1.22064
Sochacka, N. W., Guyotte, K. W., & Walther, J. (2016). Learning together: A collaborative autoethnographic exploration of STEAM (STEM + the Arts) education. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(1), 15-42.
Stohlmann, M., Moore, T., & Roehrig, G. (2012). Considerations for Teaching Integrated STEM Education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 2(1), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314653
Tenaglia, T. (2017). STEAM curriculum: Arts education as an integral part of interdisciplinary learning. Messiah College Curriculum and Instruction Research Project, Parkway.
Thi, N., Hang, T., & Van Thiet, P. (n.d.). Integrated Teaching in Vietnam’s General Education Program-Objectives and Orientation for Primary Schools. Issue 3 Ser. III, 12, 73–77. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-1203037377
Thi, P., Hanh, H., Thi, C., & Quyen, M. (n.d.). Number 30 June/2020. http://www.vietrobot.edu.vn/mo-hinh-day-hoc-
Thu Hang, N. T., & Tu Quyen, N. (2022). Financial Education in connection to real life for primary school students in Vietnam. International Journal of Education and Social Science Research, 05(02), 208–217. https://doi.org/10.37500/ijessr.2022.5213
