LIVING INHERITANCE OF DAI TEXTILE CRAFTSMANSHIP AND FEMININE AGENCY TRANSFORMATION: AN ETHNOGRAPHIC PRACTICE IN RURAL REVITALIZATION OF MANG VILLAGE, DEHONG, CHINA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejsss.v11i1.1934Palavras-chave:
living inheritance, Dai textile craftsmanship, feminine agency transformation, rural revitalization, craft ethnographyResumo
Current research shows two oversights regarding female cultural subjectivity in rural change: it overlooks the role of intangible cultural heritage in reshaping gender roles. It fails to examine women’s governance in overcoming the “family-market” divide. This paper examines the Dai textile craftsmanship in Mang Village, Yunnan, China, employing a case study approach to develop a “cultural aggregation- subject activation” framework to elucidate the interactive dynamics between rural revitalization and women’s development. The findings of this study indicate the following: First, textile techniques reconstruct cultural space through the triad of material production, ritual performance, and pattern narration, encouraging women to evolve from “family producers” to “cultural meaning creators,” thereby reinterpreting ethnic memory through symbolic engagement. Second, women leverage traditional mutual aid networks to engage in rural governance, transforming “domestic” labor into organizational and coordination skills, thereby exhibiting distinctive community mobilization in the development of cultural spaces and the planning of folk activities, culminating in a capacity progression from “skill inheritors” to “cultural operators.” Third, the industrialization of handicrafts yields combined benefits in terms of economic empowerment, cultural continuity, and community solidarity. Women employ flexible production models to harmonize family responsibilities with public participation, which not only mitigates the effects of industrialization on rural regions but also reconciles the divide between tradition and modernity through the role of cultural intermediaries, fostering a symbiotic structure of “policy-culture” dual empowerment. This research demonstrates how rural women convert local knowledge into revitalization impetus by activating cultural subjectivity, offering theoretical and practical pathways for reconstructing an inclusive governance framework.
Article visualizations:
Referências
Fei XT, 2013. Rural China, Shanghai, China
Liang SM, 2015. Rural Construction Theory, Beijing, China
Liu ZY, Liu CJ, 2018. The Post-productivist Countryside: A Theoretical Perspective of Rural Revitalization. China Rural Survey 05: 2-13. doi: 10.20074/j.cnki.11-3586/f.2018.05.001.
Qu AX, Meng ZY, Wang MQ, et al., 2023. Spatial reconstruction of intangible cultural heritage in post-productivist countryside: A case study of Mazhuang sachet in Xuzhou, Jiangsu. Journal of Jiangsu Normal University (Natural Science Edition) 41(03): 8-13.
Wang TW, Liu ZY, Xu ZZ, 2024. "Post-Productionism": Theory, Practice, and Its Implications for China. Tropical Geography 44(7): 1263-1278. doi: 10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.20230318.
Wilson G A, 2009. Post-productivist and multifunctional agriculture. In: Kitchin R, Thrift N (Eds.). International encyclopedia of human geography. Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd, 379-386.
Zhang JY, 2025. Aggregation of Cultural Functions: The Cultural Logic of Stimulating Peasants’ Subjectivity in Rural Revitalization. China Rural Survey 02: 103-125. doi: 10.20074/j.cnki.11-3586/f.2025.02.006.
Liu SJ, 2024. Research on Rural Revitalization in China from the Perspective of Post-Productionism. Agricultural Economy 11: 43-45.
Zhang JX, Shen MR, Zhao C, 2014. Rural Renaissance: Rural China Transformation Under Productivism and Post-productivism. Urban Planning International 29(05): 1-7.


