THE APPLICATION OF THE CONCEPT OF MANAGING AND SETTLING THE BANKRUPT DEBTOR’S ASSETS PROCESS PERFORMED BY THE CURATOR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejsss.v0i0.534Ključne reči:
assets, bankrupt debtor, curatorApstrakt
The purpose of this research is to find out the form of the application model and concept of the management and the settlement process of bankrupt assets of debtor carried out by the curator. The main result of this research is the curator's main duties and authorities in carrying out the tasks of management and bankruptcy of assets from the date the bankruptcy decision is pronounced. However, these duties and authorities are detailed by law to avoid differences in interpretation from many parties involved. This proposition is quite appropriate given the vulnerability of the curator's duty to the lawsuit from third parties, debtors, and even the creditors themselves. The conclusion of this study is that the curator must cooperate with various parties, namely bankrupt debtors, creditors, supervisory judges. This is useful for the smooth process of management and settlement of the bankrupt debtors' assets in paying their debts to creditors. The curator has several ways of managing and clearing up the bankrupt debtor's assets but the most important is cooperation or good relations with the parties involved, thus, no party feels disadvantaged by the curator.
Article visualizations:
Reference
Ediwarman. 2011. Monograf. Metode Penelitian Hukum (Panduan Penulisan Tesis dan Disertasi), Medan.
Hadi, S. M. (2008). Hukum Kepailitan (Prinsip, Norma, dan Praktik di Peradilan). Kencana Prenada Media Group. Jakarta.
Hartanto, J. A. (2015). Hukum jaminan dan kepailitan: hak kreditor separatis dalam pembagian hasil penjualan benda jaminan debitor pailit. Laksbang Justitia Surabaya.
Imaniyati, N. S., & Putra, P. A. A. (2016). Pengantar Hukum Perbankan Indonesia. Refika Aditama, Bandung
Mahadi, (2003). Falsafah Hukum: Suatu Pengantar, Alumni, Bandung.
Mahmud Marzuki, P. (2005). Penelitian hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media, 55.
Muljadi, K. (2005). Kreditor Preferens dan Kreditor Separatis Dalam Kepailitan. Pusat Pengkajian Hukum, Jakarta.
Nomor, K. P. R. I. (97). Tahun 1999 Tentang Pembentukan Pengadilan Niaga Pada Pengadilan Negeri Ujung Pandang. Pengadilan Negeri Medan, Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya, dan Pengadilan Negeri Semarang.
No, U. U. (37). Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU).
Novita, T. R & Husna, M. F (2016). Analisis Model Penyelesaian Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Menurut UU No.37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan & PKPU. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Hasil Penelitian 2016, Medan. 947-959
Pemerintah Indonesia. 2004. Undang-Undang No.37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang.
Pemerintah Indonesia. 1998. Undang-undang No.10 Tahun 1998 Tentang Perbankan.
Sinaga, S. M. (2012). Hukum Kepailitan Indonesia. PT. Tatanusa..
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.
