UNDERSTANDING THE ROLE OF SES, ETHNICITY, AND DISCIPLINE INFRACTIONS IN STUDENTS’ STANDARDIZED TEST SCORES
Schlagwörter:
SES, ethnicity, standardized test scores, student achievementAbstract
The goal of the current study is to examine the impact of students’ social economic status, ethnicity, and discipline infractions on their standardized test scores in Indiana, the USA. Data from this study extracted from Indiana Department of Education. ISTEP is a criterion-referenced standardized test. It consists of items that assess a student’s performance with respect to particular criteria that was established by the Indiana State Board of Education. Criterion-referenced test scores help us to understand where a student stands in relation to the cut scores based Indiana Academic Standards in English/Language Arts and Mathematics. In fact, the application of ISTEP might be helpful for schools to identify their students’ strengths and weaknesses in these content areas. By doing so, they take necessary steps to plan appropriate instruction for students’ academic development. However, the Indiana Department of Education’s statistical data show that there was a statistically significant achievement gap between students. Accordingly, the current study findings point out that the effects of SES and Race varied among groups. Specifically, African-American students with low SES status had lower scores on ISTEP than their white peers did. In addition, a chi-square analysis showed that disproportionality among African American students appeared to be striking. Findings and educational implications are discussed.
Literaturhinweise
Burchinal, M., McCartney, K., Steinberg, L., Crosnoe, R., Friedman, S. L., McLoyd, V., & Pianta, Camara, W. J., & Schmidt, A. E. (1999). Group Differences in Standardized Testing and Social Stratification. Report No. 99-5. College Entrance Examination Board.
Coleman, J., Campbell, E., Hobson, C., McPartland, J., Mood, A., Weinfeld, F. D., et al. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: Department of Health, Education and Welfare. Cornbleth, C., & Waugh, D. (1995). The great speckled bird: Multicultural politics and education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Edelson, D. C., Gordin, D. N., & Pea, R. D. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design. Journal of the learning sciences, 8(3-4), 391-450.
Evans, G. W., & Rosenbaum, J. (2008). Self-regulation and the income-achievement gap. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23(4), 504-514.
Gay, G. (2004). Multicultural curriculum theory and multicultural education. In J. A. Banks & C. M. Banks (Eds.), Handbook of research in multicultural education (2nd ed., pp. 30–49). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Gordon, R., Della Piana, L., & Keleher, T. (2001). Zero tolerance: A basic racial report card. Zero tolerance: Resisting the drive for punishment in our schools, 165-175.
Grant, C. A. (2003). An education guide to diversity in the classroom. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Gregory, A., Skiba, R. J., & Noguera, P. A. (2010). The achievement gap and the discipline gap: Two sides of the same coin?. Educational Researcher, 39(1), 59-68.
Haladyna, T. M., Nolen, S. B., & Haas, N. S. (1991). Raising standardized achievement test scores and the origins of test score pollution. Educational Researcher, 20(5), 2-7.
Hedges, L. V., & Nowell, A. (1999). Changes in the black-white gap in achievement test scores. Sociology of education, 111-135.
Hess, R. D., & Shipman, V. C. (1965). Early experience and the socialization of cognitive modes in children. Child development, 869-886.
Hoff, E., Laursen, B., Tardif, T., & Bornstein, M. (2002). Socioeconomic status and parenting. Handbook of parenting Volume 2: Biology and ecology of parenting, 8(2), 231-52.
Hunter, R. C., & Bartee, R. (2003). The achievement gap: Issues of competition, class, and race. Education and Urban Society, 35(2), 151-160.
Jencks, C., & Phillips, M. (Eds.). (2011). The Black-White test score gap. Brookings Institution Press.
Ladson-Billings, G. (2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in US schools. Educational researcher, 35(7), 3-12.
Lewis, C. W., Butler, B. R., Bonner III, F. A., & Joubert, M. (2010). African American Male Discipline Patterns and School District Responses Resulting Impact on Academic Achievement: Implications for Urban Educators and Policy Makers. Journal of African American Males in Education, 1(1).
Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (1997). Enacting project-based science. The elementary school journal, 97(4), 341-358.
Meehan, B. T., Hughes, J. N., & Cavell, T. A. (2003). Teacher–student relationships as compensatory resources for aggressive children. Child development, 74(4), 1145-1157.
Pigott, R. L., & Cowen, E. L. (2000). Teacher race, child race, racial congruence, and teacher ratings of children's school adjustment. Journal of School Psychology, 38(2), 177-195.
Reardon, S. F. (2013). The widening income achievement gap. Educational Leadership, 70(8), 10-16.
Reyes, A. H. (2006). Discipline, achievement, and race. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Reynolds, AJ (1992). Comparing measures of parental involvement and their effects on academic achievement. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 7(3), 441-462.
Skiba, R. J., Horner, R. H., Chung, C. G., Rausch, M. K., May, S. L., & Tobin, T. (2011). Race is not neutral: A national investigation of African American and Latino disproportionality in school discipline. School Psychology Review, 40(1), 85.
Steele, C. M. (1999, August). Thin ice: “Stereotype threat” and Black college students. Atlantic Monthly, 284, 44–47, 50–54
Wald, J., & Losen, D. J. (2003). Defining and redirecting a school‐to‐prison pipeline. New Directions for Student Leadership, 2003(99), 9-15.
Weinstein, R. S., Madison, S. B., Kuklinski, M. R., Soule, C. R., Collins, E., Cone, J., & Mehlhorn, M. Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Implementing Higher (High or Hire) Standards. Educational Researcher, 25(8), 19-21.
Veröffentlicht
Ausgabe
Rubrik
Lizenz
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
