THE EFFECTS OF PORTFOLIOS ON DEVELOPING STUDENTS’ WRITING ABILITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v9i1.5258Keywords:
attitude, portfolios, writing ability, writing achievementAbstract
This study aimed to look into the effects of portfolios in developing writing skills among students who major in tourism at a university in Ho Chi Minh City. The study was conducted on fifty third-year students. Random assignment of participants to an experimental or control group of twenty-five students each. For fulfilling the objective, a quasi-experimental research design was utilized. Both groups were given a pre-test to determine their writing performance and sub-skills of focus, elaboration, organization, vocabulary, and mechanics before the treatment. Throughout the study, the experimental group was instructed with portfolio assessment, whereas the control group was trained in the conventional method. After receiving the treatment, students in the experimental group were also required to complete a survey regarding the effectiveness of using portfolios to improve writing skills in English classes. The attitude survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, including frequencies, percentages, means, and standard deviations. Other data were gathered through semi-structured interviews with learners who are representative students at different levels. The results of student questionnaires and student interview data showed that most students had positive attitudes regarding using portfolios to improve their writing skills in English classes. They all believe portfolios could help develop their writing ability. Though the limitation is unavoidable, the study is expected to benefit teachers, students, and researchers of the related studies.
Article visualizations:
References
Apple, M. & E. Shimo (2004). Learners to teacher: portfolios, please! Perceptions of portfolio assessment in EFL classrooms. The Interface between Interlanguage, Pragmatics and Assessment: Proceedings of the 3rd Annual JALT Pan-SIG Conference: pp.53–58. Tokyo, Japan: Tokyo Keizai University
Aydin, S. (2010). EFL writers’ perceptions of portfolio keeping. Assessing Writing, 15(3), 194-203.
Aydin, S. (2014). EFL writers’ attitudes and perceptions toward F-Portfolio use. TechTrends, 58, 59-77.
Brown R. (1995). Portfolio Development and Profiling for Nurses, 2nd ed. Quay Publications, Lancaster.
Brown, H. D., & Abeywickrama, P. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.
Caner, M. (2010). Students’ views on using portfolio assessment in EFL writing courses. Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, 10 (1), 223-236.
Demirel, M., & Duman, H. (2015). The use of portfolio in English language teaching and its effects on achievement and attitude. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 2634-2640.
Genesee, F., Upshur, J. A., & Richards, J. C. (1996). Classroom-based evaluation in second language education. Cambridge University Press.
Hamp-Lyons, L., & Con, W. (2000). Assessing the portfolio principles for practice, theory, and research. Hampton Press.
Hirvela, A., & Sweetland, Y. L. (2005). Two case studies of L2 writers’ experiences across learning-directed portfolio contexts. Assessing Writing, 10(3), 192-213.
Husin, M. S., & Nurbayani, E. (2017). The Ability of Indonesian EFL Learners in Writing Academic Papers. Dinamika Ilmu, 17(2), 237-250.
Koç, T. (2013). EFL teachers' and students' perceptions towards the use of writing portfolios in the language learning process (Master's thesis, Çağ Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü).
Lam, R. (2010a). The role of self-assessment in students' writing portfolios: A classroom investigation. TESL Reporter, 43, 20-20.
Lam, R. (2013). Two portfolio systems: EFL students’ perceptions of writing ability, text improvement, and feedback. Assessing Writing, 18(2), 132-153.
Lam, R. (2016). Assessment as learning: examining a cycle of teaching, learning, and assessment of writing in the portfolio-based classroom. Studies in higher education, 41(11), 1900-1917. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2014.999317
Langan, J. (2010). Exploring Writing: Sentences and Paragraphs. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies.
Nezakatgoo, B. (2011). The Effects of Portfolio Assessment on Writing of EFL Students. English Language Teaching, 4(2), 231-241.
Nguyen, T. H. (2015). Problems affecting learning writing skills of grade 11 at Thong Linh High School. Asian Journal of Educational Research, 3 (2), 53-69.
Oshima, A., & Hogue, A. (2007). Introduction to academic writing (p. 3). Pearson/Longman.
Pintrich, P. R. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). University of Michigan.
Raimes, A. (1983). Techniques in teaching writing. Oxford University Press, 200 Madison Ave., New York.
Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (Eds.). (2002). Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice. Cambridge University Press.
Song, B., & August, B. (2002). Using portfolios to assess the writing of ESL students: A powerful alternative? Journal of Second Language Writing, 11(1), 49-72.
Spratt, M., Pulverness, A., & Williams, M. (2005). The TKT course. Cambridge University Press.
Tabatabaei, O., & Assefi, F. (2012). The Effect of Portfolio Assessment Technique on Writing Performance of EFL Learners. English Language Teaching, 5(5), 138-147.
Uçar, S., & Yazıcı, Y. (2016). The impact of portfolios on enhancing writing skills in ESP classes. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 226-233. International Education Journal, 1 (1), 22-31.
Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge University Press.
Weigle, S. C. (2007). Teaching writing teachers about assessment. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(3), 194-209.
Yang, N. D. (2003). Integrating portfolios into learning strategy-based instruction for EFL college students. IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 41(4), 293-317.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


